LOLZ (NSFW)

All the news from the peanut gallery and where all the nasty trash talk fails miserably.
It can get NSFW-ish here: you have been warned!

Moderator: Animal

Post Reply
User avatar
megman
Nanook of the North
Posts: 5702
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:37 pm
Location: Halfway between the Equator and the North Pole

LOLZ (NSFW)

#1

Post by megman »

Image
MY PEOPLE SKILLS ARE JUST FINE. IT"S MY TOLERANCE FOR IDIOTS THAT NEEDS WORK
User avatar
Stapes
World's Only Blue Collar Guy
Posts: 12853
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:50 pm
Location: Port St Lucie former Dirty Jerzey

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#2

Post by Stapes »

Image
I blame Biker.
User avatar
FreakShowFanatic
12 Monkeys and More!
Posts: 6001
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:17 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#3

Post by FreakShowFanatic »

Image
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#4

Post by necronomous »

FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:26 am Image
Why is this funny?
Antknot
Not UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 6741
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#5

Post by Antknot »

Glad someone asked. So I don't look like I don't get it. (I don't.)
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#6

Post by CaptQuint »

Image
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
megman
Nanook of the North
Posts: 5702
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:37 pm
Location: Halfway between the Equator and the North Pole

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#7

Post by megman »

Image
MY PEOPLE SKILLS ARE JUST FINE. IT"S MY TOLERANCE FOR IDIOTS THAT NEEDS WORK
User avatar
megman
Nanook of the North
Posts: 5702
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:37 pm
Location: Halfway between the Equator and the North Pole

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#8

Post by megman »

Image
MY PEOPLE SKILLS ARE JUST FINE. IT"S MY TOLERANCE FOR IDIOTS THAT NEEDS WORK
User avatar
HighNDry
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 2720
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:25 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#9

Post by HighNDry »

necronomous wrote: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:47 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:26 am Image
Why is this funny?
Is the blonde a dude?
Rice is great if you're really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.
-Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#10

Post by CaptQuint »

Image
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#11

Post by necronomous »

captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:10 am Image
That's not funny. It's a fucking horrible idea. Why would you want inefficient and overpriced gas?
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#12

Post by CaptQuint »

necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:53 pm
captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:10 am Image
That's not funny. It's a fucking horrible idea. Why would you want inefficient and overpriced gas?
You don't think unregulated monopolies overcharge?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#13

Post by necronomous »

captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:00 pm
necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:53 pm
captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:10 am Image
That's not funny. It's a fucking horrible idea. Why would you want inefficient and overpriced gas?
You don't think unregulated monopolies overcharge?
But they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#14

Post by CaptQuint »

necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:50 pm
captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:00 pm
necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:53 pm

That's not funny. It's a fucking horrible idea. Why would you want inefficient and overpriced gas?
You don't think unregulated monopolies overcharge?
But they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.
So price gouging is fine as long as it is not inefficient, got it
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#15

Post by AnalHamster »

If you go with evidence rather than your gut neither model is intrinsically more efficient. Both have potential flaws that regulation can avoid. A private company with a monopoly will price gouge if it isn't prevented from doing so, because the normal check to that, competition, is not there. On the other hand it tends to lead to higher infrastructure investment.

Edumacate yoselves if interested.
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/li ... ciency.pdf
User avatar
beagleboy
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 2120
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:23 pm
Location: Free born

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#16

Post by beagleboy »

The LOLZ thread isn't very LOLZ.
User avatar
QillerDaemon
Crazy Old Cat Lady
Posts: 4019
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:35 pm
Location: Beautiful downtown OrloVista FL
Interests: キラーデモン
Occupation: Router/Switch Jockey.

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#17

Post by QillerDaemon »

necronomous wrote: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:47 pm Why is this funny?
Manly handshake? IDK...
If you can't be a good example, you can still serve as a horrible warning.
“All mushrooms are edible. Some even more than once!”
これを グーグル 翻訳に登録してくれておめでとう、バカ。
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#18

Post by necronomous »

captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:57 pm
necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:50 pm
captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:00 pm

You don't think unregulated monopolies overcharge?
But they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.
So price gouging is fine as long as it is not inefficient, got it
Nice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#19

Post by necronomous »

analhamster wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:19 pm If you go with evidence rather than your gut neither model is intrinsically more efficient. Both have potential flaws that regulation can avoid. A private company with a monopoly will price gouge if it isn't prevented from doing so, because the normal check to that, competition, is not there. On the other hand it tends to lead to higher infrastructure investment.

Edumacate yoselves if interested.
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/li ... ciency.pdf
I'd prefer competition, no monopolies, including the government monopoly, and shitty taxes.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#20

Post by necronomous »

QillerDaemon wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:51 pm
necronomous wrote: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:47 pm Why is this funny?
Manly handshake? IDK...
Maybe?
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#21

Post by necronomous »

beagleboy wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:39 pm The LOLZ thread isn't very LOLZ.
Maybe its ironically funny?
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#22

Post by CaptQuint »

necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:06 pm
captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:57 pm
necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:50 pm

But they arent inefficient nor do they run up the tax bill.
So price gouging is fine as long as it is not inefficient, got it
Nice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.
Did you skip the last part?

Image
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7948
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#23

Post by necronomous »

captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:09 pm
necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:06 pm
captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:57 pm

So price gouging is fine as long as it is not inefficient, got it
Nice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.
Did you skip the last part?

Image
Cause that's what the government is known for. Amirite!!
User avatar
CaptQuint
Biker's Biatch
Posts: 30361
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:18 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#24

Post by CaptQuint »

necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:10 pm
captquint wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:09 pm
necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:06 pm
Nice leap in logic. However, I'd rather the private company gouge me and it run well than the government gouge me and it run like shit and then tax me to get it to run like shit.
Did you skip the last part?

Image
Cause that's what the government is known for. Amirite!!
If you feel that it is being run incorrectly you can vote in Opposition or run for the position yourself. Or I can stand in front of the company with a sign. One seems more effective than the other.
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
User avatar
AnalHamster
Doctor Chaser
Posts: 6471
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm

Re: LOLZ (NSFW)

#25

Post by AnalHamster »

necronomous wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:08 pm
analhamster wrote: Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:19 pm If you go with evidence rather than your gut neither model is intrinsically more efficient. Both have potential flaws that regulation can avoid. A private company with a monopoly will price gouge if it isn't prevented from doing so, because the normal check to that, competition, is not there. On the other hand it tends to lead to higher infrastructure investment.

Edumacate yoselves if interested.
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/li ... ciency.pdf
I'd prefer competition, no monopolies, including the government monopoly, and shitty taxes.
There's only one set of infrastructure. It's an inherent monopoly that can only be mitigated by government regulation. This is why it's one of the areas where public and private actually achieve about the same efficiency results. When private companies get involved they are bound by the kinds of rules that restrain public companies from fucking over their customers.
Post Reply