Re: This will appeal to sane voters
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:36 pm
Hey, looks like they got their protest national attention!
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
How do you know what they want? We reached the point that detaining large amounts of brown people in squalor is a popular thingVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 5:24 pm Not the kind of attention they want. I hope we haven’t reached a point where pissing in the American flag is a popular thing.
We detain them, as is necessary. The conditions, I don't know about, but after a point it just comes down to money and manpower. They are overwhelming the system, perhaps intentionally. The solution is NOT to give up our sovereignty. Also, find the root causes (as in people/orgs, as opposed to poverty, etc.) and stop them. They will continue as long as they think they have leverage with our media and internal political fighting.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 5:41 pmHow do you know what they want? We reached the point that detaining large amounts of brown people in squalor is a popular thingVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 5:24 pm Not the kind of attention they want. I hope we haven’t reached a point where pissing in the American flag is a popular thing.
Amazing how many right wing lies just "show up on your feed"Biker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 6:55 pmI don’t follow that, it showed up on my feedCaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 6:45 pm Lol Biker the big Democrat follows a right wingnut job facebook meme account
https://www.facebook.com/ThePatriotFederation/
That doesn't sound like a fascist policy at allBigRedRetard wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:39 pm Whomever touched the US flag should have been shot on the spot for fucking with Federal proeprty
So you agree they are concentration camps but don't like people calling them what they are because it bothers you.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 10:17 pm Why must we play games with words? Yes, they are concentration camps
It is intellectually dishonest to refer to the detention centers as concentration camps
I agree that they are camps whose purpose is to concentrate subjects, so they are concentration camps, but I also recognize that the reason opponents call them concentration camps is not to identify them, but to invoke something very different in people's minds. It's like comparing someone to Hitler or the Nazis. It's psy-opsCaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 10:21 pmSo you agree they are concentration camps but don't like people calling them what they are because it bothers you.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 10:17 pm Why must we play games with words? Yes, they are concentration camps
It is intellectually dishonest to refer to the detention centers as concentration camps
It's psy-opsVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 10:27 pmI agree that they are camps whose purpose is to concentrate subjects, so they are concentration camps, but I also recognize that the reason opponents call them concentration camps is not to identify them, but to invoke something very different in people's minds. It's like comparing someone to Hitler or the Nazis. It's psy-opsCaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 10:21 pmSo you agree they are concentration camps but don't like people calling them what they are because it bothers you.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 10:17 pm Why must we play games with words? Yes, they are concentration camps
It is intellectually dishonest to refer to the detention centers as concentration camps
That's just absurd. For one, if I buy a flag, it's my flag, not property of the federal government.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:39 pm Whomever touched the US flag should have been shot on the spot for fucking with Federal proeprty
Only when it's "convenient"Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:15 pmThat's just absurd. For one, if I buy a flag, it's my flag, not property of the federal government.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:39 pm Whomever touched the US flag should have been shot on the spot for fucking with Federal proeprty
Second, it's expression very clearly protected by the First Amendment.
Third, do conservatives only want speech protected if they agree with it?
I thought your type was all about the Constitution.
"I disagree with your position so I will encourage shooting you for expressing it."FSchmertz wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:17 pmOnly when it's "convenient"Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:15 pmThat's just absurd. For one, if I buy a flag, it's my flag, not property of the federal government.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:39 pm Whomever touched the US flag should have been shot on the spot for fucking with Federal proeprty
Second, it's expression very clearly protected by the First Amendment.
Third, do conservatives only want speech protected if they agree with it?
I thought your type was all about the Constitution.
They didn't buy that flag it WAS owned by the Fed's.Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:15 pmThat's just absurd. For one, if I buy a flag, it's my flag, not property of the federal government.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:39 pm Whomever touched the US flag should have been shot on the spot for fucking with Federal proeprty
Damaging someone else's property is ok?
Second, it's expression very clearly protected by the First Amendment.
Third, do conservatives only want speech protected if they agree with it?
I thought your type was all about the Constitution.
My error, I thought we were discussing burning flags generally. Shooting them is still excessive.Antknot wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:30 pmThey didn't buy that flag it WAS owned by the Fed's.Wut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:15 pmThat's just absurd. For one, if I buy a flag, it's my flag, not property of the federal government.BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 7:39 pm Whomever touched the US flag should have been shot on the spot for fucking with Federal proeprtyDamaging someone else's property is ok?
Second, it's expression very clearly protected by the First Amendment.
If they had bought the flag it would be lawful (note I didn't say ok)
Third, do conservatives only want speech protected if they agree with it?
I thought your type was all about the Constitution.