The Necro-Hammy Romance - aka Necro's epic dodge

[PopcornSutton]

If there were irrefutable proof that Trump was involved with manipulating the election results, he would not be in office. It hasn't happened. There is also records of the DNC and Russian involvement, they haven't been charged either. There is as much speculation on the democratic side as there is on the republican side. Actually I think there is more evidence against the dems involved, but again, nothing has happened. Nobody has been charged, nobody is in jail, and it doesn't look like there will be.

What would the media do if to weren't for churning this shit?

Actually lots were charged and a bunch went to jail on the chump team for their coverup attempts, the Russian GRU agents were just indicted as Russia won't hand them over. The question I asked you was are you capable of recognising the established fact that there was russian interference in the 2016 election?

First, name who has gone to jail. Second, if there was russian interference "of fact", charges would have been issued. I'm not taking your word just because you say it's "fact".

What? Are you saying you are so far down the delusion hole you genuinely can't determine for yourself that anyone went to prison behind the Mueller investigation? Because that is delusion to the point of insanity. George popadopolous is an example already raised of one who went to jail. There are more, but at this point I'm just trying to determine your level of sanity..

Oh boy, he served 12 days and is out on probation of sorts. He lied, he brought it on himself. Cohen did the same thing. Where are the people that were caught, convicted of an actual crime and went to jail? At this point, I believe you have no objectivity at all, the only thing that drives you is the "never trump" syndrome. He

Yes, he lied about the contacts between the trump campaign and the russkies. You seem to be struggling with the concept that the coverup is the crime.

I'm not struggling with anything. I'm still waiting for this huge list of locked up people you say there are. And no comment about the DNC involvement with Russia.

[AnalHamster]

Actually lots were charged and a bunch went to jail on the chump team for their coverup attempts, the Russian GRU agents were just indicted as Russia won't hand them over. The question I asked you was are you capable of recognising the established fact that there was russian interference in the 2016 election?

First, name who has gone to jail. Second, if there was russian interference "of fact", charges would have been issued. I'm not taking your word just because you say it's "fact".

What? Are you saying you are so far down the delusion hole you genuinely can't determine for yourself that anyone went to prison behind the Mueller investigation? Because that is delusion to the point of insanity. George popadopolous is an example already raised of one who went to jail. There are more, but at this point I'm just trying to determine your level of sanity..

Oh boy, he served 12 days and is out on probation of sorts. He lied, he brought it on himself. Cohen did the same thing. Where are the people that were caught, convicted of an actual crime and went to jail? At this point, I believe you have no objectivity at all, the only thing that drives you is the "never trump" syndrome. He

Yes, he lied about the contacts between the trump campaign and the russkies. You seem to be struggling with the concept that the coverup is the crime.

I'm not struggling with anything. I'm still waiting for this huge list of locked up people you say there are. And no comment about the DNC involvement with Russia.

What DNC involvement with Russia? Is there some reason you cannot google 'mueller indictments' for yourself? This is not hard to locate information-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_C ... 80%932019)

[necronomous]

The russkies did interfere in your campaign, the trump campaign did collude with them in doing so. It's not a conspiracy if it's real. Would you like to go through some examples of the collusion?

That's from the first page, so really the conversation is more like this -

I'm not even saying he didn't collude, I just want the proof.
This is essentially the conversation with AH:

AH: Mueller proves trump campaign collusion, repeatedly
Me: Prove it
AH: Ok here you go
Me: waaaah! No! You have to prove trump personally did it while wearing a tutu and riding a rhinoceros! THat's what you said!
AH: umm, ok. Let's get to that after you admit I just demonstratraed trump campaign collusion as I said I would way back on page 1.
Me: waah derple can't admit that so must run away

No you are giving me what you are saying is trump campaign collusion. What did I ask for? Proof of trump himself colluding. Just do that. But no you won't because of some weird stupid going through your head. What does it matter if I admit the campaign or not, I'm not asking for the campaign. I've ran from nothing. You are the one being dodgy as fuck.

[AnalHamster]

The russkies did interfere in your campaign, the trump campaign did collude with them in doing so. It's not a conspiracy if it's real. Would you like to go through some examples of the collusion?

That's from the first page, so really the conversation is more like this -

I'm not even saying he didn't collude, I just want the proof.
This is essentially the conversation with AH:

AH: Mueller proves trump campaign collusion, repeatedly
Me: Prove it
AH: Ok here you go
Me: waaaah! No! You have to prove trump personally did it while wearing a tutu and riding a rhinoceros! THat's what you said!
AH: umm, ok. Let's get to that after you admit I just demonstratraed trump campaign collusion as I said I would way back on page 1.
Me: waah derple can't admit that so must run away

No you are giving me what you are saying is trump campaign collusion. What did I ask for? Proof of trump himself colluding. Just do that. But no you won't because of some weird stupid going through your head. What does it matter if I admit the campaign or not, I'm not asking for the campaign. I've ran from nothing. You are the one being dodgy as fuck.

Giving you exactly what I said I would from the start, yes. You seem to have confused yourself by answering 'lo l ok' initially.

If you can't admit that meeting a russian government representative offering help from the russian government constitutes collusion then there's really no point. As I've said, we can go over some examples of trump's personal involvement once you pull on your big boy pants and admit being capable of recognising collusion can actually exist. Are you denying there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign, or not?

[necronomous]

Go. Prove Trump colluded.

Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

[AnalHamster]

Go. Prove Trump colluded.

Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

[necronomous]

Go. Prove Trump colluded.

Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

Just go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.

[necronomous]

Go. Prove Trump colluded.

Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

Also no one is running. Just prove what you need to prove.

[AnalHamster]

Go. Prove Trump colluded.

Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

Just go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.

You can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?

[necronomous]

Go. Prove Trump colluded.

Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

Just go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.

You can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?

Why can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.

[AnalHamster]

Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

Just go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.

You can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?

Why can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.

Yes, we've established you tried to move the goalposts. Thing is though, it doesn't matter - You want to examine trump's involvement in the collusion between his campaign and the russian interference campaign right? But you refuse to admit that collusion can possibly exist and claim it isn't relevant if it does. This makes you look very stupid, and that is something I enjoy.

Why are you so terrified of admitting the campaign collusion?

[VinceBordenIII]

Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?

[AnalHamster]

Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?

I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.

[necronomous]

This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

Just go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.

You can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?

Why can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.

Yes, we've established you tried to move the goalposts. Thing is though, it doesn't matter - You want to examine trump's involvement in the collusion between his campaign and the russian interference campaign right? But you refuse to admit that collusion can possibly exist and claim it isn't relevant if it does. This makes you look very stupid, and that is something I enjoy.

Why are you so terrified of admitting the campaign collusion?

I never tried to move the goal post. I asked prove Trump. That's ALL I've asked. But you need me to admit things about shit I didn't ask for. I don't refuse to admit his campaign colluded on anything, I don't admit they did either, but that's NOT what I asked. Not once. No goal post moved. No different expectations other than that. Just that. Don't need to or not to admit to anything else. Just respond to the question I originally asked. Prove Trump. So if you can't do so after this, don't even worry about it, you will have given me my answer, by running away from the ONLY question I have asked.

[necronomous]

Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?

I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.

Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.

[AnalHamster]

First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.

Just go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.

You can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?

Why can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.

Yes, we've established you tried to move the goalposts. Thing is though, it doesn't matter - You want to examine trump's involvement in the collusion between his campaign and the russian interference campaign right? But you refuse to admit that collusion can possibly exist and claim it isn't relevant if it does. This makes you look very stupid, and that is something I enjoy.

Why are you so terrified of admitting the campaign collusion?

I never tried to move the goal post. I asked prove Trump. That's ALL I've asked. But you need me to admit things about shit I didn't ask for. I don't refuse to admit his campaign colluded on anything, I don't admit they did either, but that's NOT what I asked. Not once. No goal post moved. No different expectations other than that. Just that. Don't need to or not to admit to anything else. Just respond to the question I originally asked. Prove Trump. So if you can't do so after this, don't even worry about it, you will have given me my answer, by running away from the ONLY question I have asked.

You're asking me to take you through the evidence and refusing to admit you can see the evidence. In order to recognise participation in collusion you will need to be able to recognise collusion actually occurred. I'm assuming you actually can recognise collusion occurred or you wouldn't be so terrified of answering.

[AnalHamster]

Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?

I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.

Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.

So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.

[necronomous]

Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?

I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.

Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.

So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.

Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.

[AnalHamster]

Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?

I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.

Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.

So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.

Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.

You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.

[necronomous]

Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?

I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.

Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.

So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.

Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.

You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.

You've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.

[AnalHamster]

I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.

Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.

So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.

Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.

You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.

You've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.

Step 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?

[necronomous]

Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.

So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.

Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.

You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.

You've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.

Step 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?

Because I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.

[AnalHamster]

So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.

Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.

You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.

You've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.

Step 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?

Because I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.

I'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.

[necronomous]

Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.

You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.

You've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.

Step 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?

Because I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.

I'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.

Ok so nothing

[AnalHamster]

You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.

You've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.

Step 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?

Because I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.

I'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.

Ok so nothing

I'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.