Page 470 of 472

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 2:26 am
by Antknot

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:11 pm
by CHEEZY17
So...yet another "right-wing conspiracy" proven to be true?

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:30 pm
by Biker
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:11 pm
So...yet another "right-wing conspiracy" proven to be true?
All of them ended up being true

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2023 7:10 pm
by CHEEZY17
Biker wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:30 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:11 pm
So...yet another "right-wing conspiracy" proven to be true?
All of them ended up being true
Image

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 1:43 am
by CHEEZY17
Fuck you hair gel

‘We would’ve done everything differently’: Newsom reflects on Covid approach
California’s Democratic governor says “we’re all geniuses now” in hindsight on the pandemic.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/1 ... a-00114888
------------------

In other words:

"We should have handled it more like Florida."

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 1:15 pm
by Antknot
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistl ... id-origins



Whistleblower alleges CIA offered officials money to change view of COVID origins

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2023 1:20 pm
by CHEEZY17
Kiwis vote for change after former NZ government was simultaneously widely criticized and praised for its harsh Covid policies.

New Zealand elects conservative Christopher Luxon as premier after 6 years of liberal rule
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/1 ... e-00121586

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2023 12:06 am
by stonedmegman
Image

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:08 pm
by Antknot

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2023 6:37 pm
by Biker
Sure, they may cause heart inflammation but you're clearly forgetting that they're FREE!!!11!!11!

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2023 10:44 pm
by saltydog
Infowars is still alive? How?

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 6:48 pm
by Biker
saltydog wrote: Sun Dec 24, 2023 10:44 pm Infowars is still alive? How?
Alex Jones is more right than your precious NYT

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:01 am
by saltydog
Biker wrote: Mon Dec 25, 2023 6:48 pm
saltydog wrote: Sun Dec 24, 2023 10:44 pm Infowars is still alive? How?
Alex Jones is more right than your precious NYT
How was he not bankrupted by the Sandy Hook decision?

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 3:33 pm
by Antknot

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:17 pm
by Biker
How many leftists called him an Uncle Tom in their heads? 90%

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:47 pm
by QillerDaemon
Biker wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:17 pm
How many leftists called him an Uncle Tom in their heads? 90%
No, I call him "not an infectious disease specialist" whose had the minimal basic training in the subject before he became the surgeon general for Florida by a governor who specifically fished around for a doctor with a similar lack of professional training. If anyone made him an Uncle Tom, it was DeSantis. His job is to protect the state's public health, and he has basically not done that at all, since infectious disease is a huge part of public health. His opinions on public health and infectious disease were suspect long before DeSantis nominated him for the job.

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:51 pm
by Biker
QillerDaemon wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:47 pm
Biker wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 4:17 pm
How many leftists called him an Uncle Tom in their heads? 90%
No, I call him "not an infectious disease specialist" whose had the minimal basic training in the subject before he became the surgeon general for Florida by a governor who specifically fished around for a doctor with a similar lack of professional training. If anyone made him an Uncle Tom, it was DeSantis. His job is to protect the state's public health, and he has basically not done that at all, since infectious disease is a huge part of public health. His opinions on public health and infectious disease were suspect long before DeSantis nominated him for the job.
Please explain how he has not protected FL public health. And be specific, you know, with facts and sheet

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 6:09 pm
by Biker

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 8:08 pm
by Animal
Biker's funny when he goes to great lengths to show us that he doesn't understand how communicable diseases are spread.

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2024 8:51 pm
by Biker
Animal wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 8:08 pm Biker's funny when he goes to great lengths to show us that he doesn't understand how communicable diseases are spread.
Didn't read his actual testimony, eh? Got it

Now get booster number 6

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 2:44 am
by Cassandros
Biker wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 6:09 pm
This, like most public health directives regarding covid, were as unscientific as possible (all the while claiming the opposite and censoring anyone who dare point out the obvious).

For example, the science for lock-downs came from a 14 year old girl, Laura Glass, who proposed the idea for her high school science project; her father (who works at Los Alamos) picked it up and ran with it as a "good idea".

In hindsight --> its obvious that was a terrible idea. One that caused way more harm than good (I mean, really, other then being exempt and not having a hundred thousand other dipshits on the roads... was there any real positive for society? I can't think of any).

Sadly, real science took a back seat to $cience in 2020 and real science has been kneecapped ever since. And fauci is 100% "the $cience"

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 2:51 am
by Cassandros
Animal wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 8:08 pm Biker's funny when he goes to great lengths to show us that he doesn't understand how communicable diseases are spread.
So... you believe "6' social distancing" actually works and is a valid mitigation technique, still, after ~4 years?

(Hate to tell you, but actual science confirms it's not.)

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 1:41 pm
by Animal
Cassandros wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 2:51 am
Animal wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2024 8:08 pm Biker's funny when he goes to great lengths to show us that he doesn't understand how communicable diseases are spread.
So... you believe "6' social distancing" actually works and is a valid mitigation technique, still, after ~4 years?

(Hate to tell you, but actual science confirms it's not.)
i know how important it is to you to dispute every single thing Fauci ever said, but that report doesn't dispute the effectiveness of maintaining 6 feet. How many times were people social distancing in the wind? :lol: My god. This was for standing in line at Home Depot or Piggly Wiggly, where the wind is typically not that much.

and it takes no more science than common sense to know that when you have a disease that is passed on from one person to another, then keeping those people from coming in direct contact is smart. Which is probably where it went over your head.

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:53 pm
by Biker
Animal wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 1:41 pm i know how important it is to you to dispute every single thing Fauci ever said, but that report doesn't dispute the effectiveness of maintaining 6 feet.
It also doesn't buttress its effectiveness

Re: Wuhan Coronavirus

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 5:06 pm
by Animal
Biker wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 4:53 pm
Animal wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2024 1:41 pm i know how important it is to you to dispute every single thing Fauci ever said, but that report doesn't dispute the effectiveness of maintaining 6 feet.
It also doesn't buttress its effectiveness
not if you are standing out in the wind. that's for sure.