For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison comics gets a three-day vacation.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 12:31 pm
He showed up where? Oh, thats right. He showed up to the wrong place so your statement is ridiculous and irrelevant. Hunter does not get to make his own rules; thats not how it works. The subpoena doesnt say: "Hunter please show up to the front of the building for a press conference."
The committee rejected his offer to appear publicly last month so the subpoena was not some crazy surprise.
The official and legal subpoena says to appear for a closed door session as has been done throughout this whole process and Hunter defied that. You can dance around that fact all you want but that is the bottom line.
He showed up to testify in public, as was offered. That's not making up his own rules, that's taking your boys up on their offer.
Your boys balked. Keep dancing around that, we both know you have no leg to stand on. Just as we both know what happens when Republicans shield testimony from public view. Your desperation to avoid yet another embarrassment is obvious. And through it all, you still got nothing against the actual president. You and your reps can't even call out what the supposed crime is that they're looking for. Hack.
No. The official and legal subpoena calls for appearing for a closed door session. He decided to ignore the subpoena and show up at the wrong place for a press conference because he didnt like the subpoena conditions. That is the definition of trying to make your own rules.
The subpoena is the authority not Hunters preference.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 4:19 pm
No. The official and legal subpoena calls for appearing for a closed door session. He decided to ignore the subpoena and show up at the wrong place for a press conference because he didnt like the subpoena conditions. That is the definition of trying to make your own rules.
The subpoena is the authority not Hunters preference.
They offered him a public testimony forum, and he took them up on it. They balked at his choice. Your desperation is fantastic. Hunter Biden, a private citizen, has more bravery than Jim Jordan who still hasn't showed up for his subpoena. And at the end of the day, they and you still have no proof of criminality against Joe Biden. You don't even have the allegation of a crime to impeach him for, let alone the evidence. Keep dancing, hack.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 4:19 pm
No. The official and legal subpoena calls for appearing for a closed door session. He decided to ignore the subpoena and show up at the wrong place for a press conference because he didnt like the subpoena conditions. That is the definition of trying to make your own rules.
The subpoena is the authority not Hunters preference.
They offered him a public testimony forum, and he took them up on it. They balked at his choice. Your desperation is fantastic. Hunter Biden, a private citizen, has more bravery than Jim Jordan who still hasn't showed up for his subpoena. And at the end of the day, they and you still have no proof of criminality against Joe Biden. You don't even have the allegation of a crime to impeach him for, let alone the evidence. Keep dancing, hack.
Don't forget to ask about Comer's shell companies!
That was Cheezy's forum Viagra on here for about 6-8 months.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 4:19 pm
No. The official and legal subpoena calls for appearing for a closed door session. He decided to ignore the subpoena and show up at the wrong place for a press conference because he didnt like the subpoena conditions. That is the definition of trying to make your own rules.
The subpoena is the authority not Hunters preference.
They offered him a public testimony forum, and he took them up on it. They balked at his choice. Your desperation is fantastic. Hunter Biden, a private citizen, has more bravery than Jim Jordan who still hasn't showed up for his subpoena. And at the end of the day, they and you still have no proof of criminality against Joe Biden. You don't even have the allegation of a crime to impeach him for, let alone the evidence. Keep dancing, hack.
The official and legal subpoena offered no such thing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Its telling that you keep ignoring what the subpoena actually says. He didnt like the terms of the subpoena so he decided to defy it and try to create his own rules.
Did Hunter honor the official and legal subpoena?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
BREAKING: James Comer releases SHOCKING new evidence that Joe Biden has an outstanding parking ticket from 2018. Comer also stated that he is following up on reports that Biden was also seen jaywalking in 2019 and that he wore white after Labor Day in 2017.
This story will be updated as details emerge.
CentralTexasCrude wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:00 am
You both fucked up. You trusted me.
Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 6:15 pmBREAKING: James Comer releases SHOCKING new evidence that Joe Biden has an outstanding parking ticket from 2018. Comer also stated that he is following up on reports that Biden was also seen jaywalking in 2019 and that he wore white after Labor Day in 2017.
This story will be updated as details emerge.
at least he didn't over state the value of any of his assets. my god, think how awful that is.
Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 6:15 pmBREAKING: James Comer releases SHOCKING new evidence that Joe Biden has an outstanding parking ticket from 2018. Comer also stated that he is following up on reports that Biden was also seen jaywalking in 2019 and that he wore white after Labor Day in 2017.
This story will be updated as details emerge.
at least he didn't over state the value of any of his assets. my god, think how awful that is.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 6:07 pm
The official and legal subpoena offered no such thing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Its telling that you keep ignoring what the subpoena actually says. He didnt like the terms of the subpoena so he decided to defy it and try to create his own rules.
Did Hunter honor the official and legal subpoena?
The writer of said subpoena went on camera and told the public Hunter Biden could choose private or public. Hunter Biden chose public. It's telling that you keep ignoring that your reps that you are defending balked at their own offer when he took them up on it. You can keep dancing, dodging, spinning everything that's happened, but those are the facts.
October 31, 2023:
James Comer wrote:
“We have mountains of evidence and now we’re ready to bring ‘em in. We’re, we’re in the downhill phase of this investigation now because we have so many documents and, and we can bring these people in for depositions or committee hearings, whichever they choose, and we can ask these questions with evidence.”
Once again, for those not following along, Comer and co chickened out and won't accept public testimony despite offering it on camera before issuing the subpoena. What does that mean, hack? It means Hunter Biden showed up, Comer and the rest of your crooks and traitors balked. Seethe harder.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 6:07 pm
The official and legal subpoena offered no such thing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Its telling that you keep ignoring what the subpoena actually says. He didnt like the terms of the subpoena so he decided to defy it and try to create his own rules.
Did Hunter honor the official and legal subpoena?
The writer of said subpoena went on camera and told the public Hunter Biden could choose private or public. Hunter Biden chose public. It's telling that you keep ignoring that your reps that you are defending balked at their own offer when he took them up on it. You can keep dancing, dodging, spinning everything that's happened, but those are the facts.
October 31, 2023:
James Comer wrote:
“We have mountains of evidence and now we’re ready to bring ‘em in. We’re, we’re in the downhill phase of this investigation now because we have so many documents and, and we can bring these people in for depositions or committee hearings, whichever they choose, and we can ask these questions with evidence.”
Once again, for those not following along, Comer and co chickened out and won't accept public testimony despite offering it on camera before issuing the subpoena. What does that mean, hack? It means Hunter Biden showed up, Comer and the rest of your crooks and traitors balked. Seethe harder.
He showed up at the wrong place. The subpoena called for him to be at a closed door session inside. whoops!
Dude, the subpoena is what it is and says what it says. The subpoena itself, which is the authority here, never mentions a public hearing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Thats it. Thats the end of story. Hunter defied the subpoena and chose to have a press conference instead.
Did Hunter honor the subpoena? Or are you back to dodging questions?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
He showed up at the wrong place. The subpoena called for him to be at a closed door session inside. whoops!
He chose public as was offered. Your guys balked. Whoops.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
Dude, the subpoena is what it is and says what it says. The subpoena itself, which is the authority here, never mentions a public hearing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Thats it. Thats the end of story. Hunter defied the subpoena and chose to have a press conference instead.
Did Hunter honor the subpoena? Or are you back to dodging questions?
Dude, the writer of the subpoena preened for the camera and boasted that those subpoenaed could come before them in private or public, whatever they choose. That's it. That's the end of the story. Comer and co balked after Hunter Biden chose public. Did the Republicans honor their public offer? Maybe if they hadn't proven themselves to be acting in bad faith, the outcome would be different, but you can't seem to acknowledge that and thus we get the dodging you're still doing to this day. Devon Archer PTSD for the Cheez. Seethe harder, hack.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
He showed up at the wrong place. The subpoena called for him to be at a closed door session inside. whoops!
He chose public as was offered. Your guys balked. Whoops.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
Dude, the subpoena is what it is and says what it says. The subpoena itself, which is the authority here, never mentions a public hearing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Thats it. Thats the end of story. Hunter defied the subpoena and chose to have a press conference instead.
Did Hunter honor the subpoena? Or are you back to dodging questions?
Dude, the writer of the subpoena preened for the camera and boasted that those subpoenaed could come before them in private or public, whatever they choose. That's it. That's the end of the story. Comer and co balked after Hunter Biden chose public. Did the Republicans honor their public offer? Maybe if they hadn't proven themselves to be acting in bad faith, the outcome would be different, but you can't seem to acknowledge that and thus we get the dodging you're still doing to this day. Devon Archer PTSD for the Cheez. Seethe harder, hack.
They don't wish to be reminded of this.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
He showed up at the wrong place. The subpoena called for him to be at a closed door session inside. whoops!
He chose public as was offered. Your guys balked. Whoops.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
Dude, the subpoena is what it is and says what it says. The subpoena itself, which is the authority here, never mentions a public hearing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Thats it. Thats the end of story. Hunter defied the subpoena and chose to have a press conference instead.
Did Hunter honor the subpoena? Or are you back to dodging questions?
Dude, the writer of the subpoena preened for the camera and boasted that those subpoenaed could come before them in private or public, whatever they choose. That's it. That's the end of the story. Comer and co balked after Hunter Biden chose public. Did the Republicans honor their public offer? Maybe if they hadn't proven themselves to be acting in bad faith, the outcome would be different, but you can't seem to acknowledge that and thus we get the dodging you're still doing to this day. Devon Archer PTSD for the Cheez. Seethe harder, hack.
The subpoena does not offer a public option. The subpoena calls for a closed session. Nowhere in the subpoena is a public hearing offered. Anything else is irrelevant because the subpoena issued to Hunter is current, legal and the authority. Hunter does not get to make his own rules like he is trying to do. Sorry, chief. Thats the bottom line here. Your boy defied the subpoena and youre trying desperately to spin for him.
The committee declined Hunters offer last month so the terms of the subpoena are not new or a surprise.
So, did Hunter honor the subpoena? Its a pretty simple question. Why do you keep dodging it?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
He showed up at the wrong place. The subpoena called for him to be at a closed door session inside. whoops!
He chose public as was offered. Your guys balked. Whoops.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:39 pm
Dude, the subpoena is what it is and says what it says. The subpoena itself, which is the authority here, never mentions a public hearing. The subpoena calls for a closed door session. Thats it. Thats the end of story. Hunter defied the subpoena and chose to have a press conference instead.
Did Hunter honor the subpoena? Or are you back to dodging questions?
Dude, the writer of the subpoena preened for the camera and boasted that those subpoenaed could come before them in private or public, whatever they choose. That's it. That's the end of the story. Comer and co balked after Hunter Biden chose public. Did the Republicans honor their public offer? Maybe if they hadn't proven themselves to be acting in bad faith, the outcome would be different, but you can't seem to acknowledge that and thus we get the dodging you're still doing to this day. Devon Archer PTSD for the Cheez. Seethe harder, hack.
The subpoena does not offer a public option. The subpoena calls for a closed session. Nowhere in the subpoena is a public hearing offered. Anything else is irrelevant because the subpoena issued to Hunter is current, legal and the authority. Hunter does not get to make his own rules like he is trying to do. Sorry, chief. Thats the bottom line here. Your boy defied the subpoena and youre trying desperately to spin for him.
The committee declined Hunters offer last month so the terms of the subpoena are not new or a surprise.
So, did Hunter honor the subpoena? Its a pretty simple question. Why do you keep dodging it?
Your willful ignorance continues to be tough to walk away from.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 12:48 am
The subpoena does not offer a public option. The subpoena calls for a closed session. Nowhere in the subpoena is a public hearing offered. Anything else is irrelevant because the subpoena issued to Hunter is current, legal and the authority. Hunter does not get to make his own rules like he is trying to do. Sorry, chief. Thats the bottom line here. Your boy defied the subpoena and youre trying desperately to spin for him.
The committee declined Hunters offer last month so the terms of the subpoena are not new or a surprise.
So, did Hunter honor the subpoena? Its a pretty simple question. Why do you keep dodging it?
The public on camera offer was private or public testimony. Hunter chose public. Your boys balked at their own offer. You can keep claiming irrelevant, but it goes to the very heart of the matter. Comer and co, like you, operate in bad faith. Comer and co, like you, are hacks. Keep ignoring it, keep dodging it, it makes your desperation all the more apparent. This really makes you regret Devon Archer now, for more than the reason of you falling on your face the first time around with his testimony. Your boys telegraphed their playbook, and now that it's being used against them, you don't like it. Seethe harder, hack.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 12:48 am
The subpoena does not offer a public option. The subpoena calls for a closed session. Nowhere in the subpoena is a public hearing offered. Anything else is irrelevant because the subpoena issued to Hunter is current, legal and the authority. Hunter does not get to make his own rules like he is trying to do. Sorry, chief. Thats the bottom line here. Your boy defied the subpoena and youre trying desperately to spin for him.
The committee declined Hunters offer last month so the terms of the subpoena are not new or a surprise.
So, did Hunter honor the subpoena? Its a pretty simple question. Why do you keep dodging it?
The public on camera offer was private or public testimony. Hunter chose public. Your boys balked at their own offer. You can keep claiming irrelevant, but it goes to the very heart of the matter. Comer and co, like you, operate in bad faith. Comer and co, like you, are hacks. Keep ignoring it, keep dodging it, it makes your desperation all the more apparent. This really makes you regret Devon Archer now, for more than the reason of you falling on your face the first time around with his testimony. Your boys telegraphed their playbook, and now that it's being used against them, you don't like it. Seethe harder, hack.
Dodge noted.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 1:16 am
Dodge noted.
That's what you've been doing from day one on this. Did Comer and co offer public or private testimony? Did Comer and co lie about Devon Archer's testimony? Did Comer and co lie about their bombshell Joe Biden evidence which turned out to be loan repayments, which they themselves disclosed via investigation? Did Comer and co ever come up with a crime that Joe Biden is supposed to have committed, let alone come up with evidence for said claim?
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 1:16 am
Dodge noted.
That's what you've been doing from day one on this. Did Comer and co offer public or private testimony? Did Comer and co lie about Devon Archer's testimony? Did Comer and co lie about their bombshell Joe Biden evidence which turned out to be loan repayments, which they themselves disclosed via investigation? Did Comer and co ever come up with a crime that Joe Biden is supposed to have committed, let alone come up with evidence for said claim?
So yeah, dodge(s) noted, hack.
You continue to avoid the very straightforward question. Thats you dodging (again!).
The subpoena is current and the authority here; thats what matters and the subpoena does not offer a public option. Anything previous is irrelevant because, well....its literally irrelevant with the issuance of the legal subpoena. Thats the bottom line. You keep saying it like the subpoena gave an option. It didnt. The subpoena called for a closed door session which your boy didnt like so he showed up at the wrong place and held a press conference because he wants to make his own rules. The committee rejected the public offer last month. The subpoena is what it is and it says what it says. He doesnt get to change it to his liking. Your boy defied the subpoena. Thats the bottom line.
https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden ... 3e5d98b5e0 Hunter Biden defies House GOP subpoena, demanding public hearing at the Capitol President Joe Biden’s son has insisted, through his attorney, that he wants to testify publicly and not in a private meeting Republicans pushed for.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 1:16 am
Dodge noted.
That's what you've been doing from day one on this. Did Comer and co offer public or private testimony? Did Comer and co lie about Devon Archer's testimony? Did Comer and co lie about their bombshell Joe Biden evidence which turned out to be loan repayments, which they themselves disclosed via investigation? Did Comer and co ever come up with a crime that Joe Biden is supposed to have committed, let alone come up with evidence for said claim?
So yeah, dodge(s) noted, hack.
You continue to avoid the very straightforward question. Thats you dodging (again!).
The subpoena is current and the authority here; thats what matters and the subpoena does not offer a public option. Anything previous is irrelevant because, well....its literally irrelevant with the issuance of the legal subpoena. Thats the bottom line. You keep saying it like the subpoena gave an option. It didnt. The subpoena called for a closed door session which your boy didnt like so he showed up at the wrong place and held a press conference because he wants to make his own rules. The committee rejected the public offer last month. The subpoena is what it is and it says what it says. He doesnt get to change it to his liking. Your boy defied the subpoena. Thats the bottom line.
https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden ... 3e5d98b5e0 Hunter Biden defies House GOP subpoena, demanding public hearing at the Capitol President Joe Biden’s son has insisted, through his attorney, that he wants to testify publicly and not in a private meeting Republicans pushed for.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 1:16 am
Dodge noted.
That's what you've been doing from day one on this. Did Comer and co offer public or private testimony? Did Comer and co lie about Devon Archer's testimony? Did Comer and co lie about their bombshell Joe Biden evidence which turned out to be loan repayments, which they themselves disclosed via investigation? Did Comer and co ever come up with a crime that Joe Biden is supposed to have committed, let alone come up with evidence for said claim?
So yeah, dodge(s) noted, hack.
You continue to avoid the very straightforward question. Thats you dodging (again!).
The subpoena is current and the authority here; thats what matters and the subpoena does not offer a public option. Anything previous is irrelevant because, well....its literally irrelevant with the issuance of the legal subpoena. Thats the bottom line. You keep saying it like the subpoena gave an option. It didnt. The subpoena called for a closed door session which your boy didnt like so he showed up at the wrong place and held a press conference because he wants to make his own rules. The committee rejected the public offer last month. The subpoena is what it is and it says what it says. He doesnt get to change it to his liking. Your boy defied the subpoena. Thats the bottom line.
https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden ... 3e5d98b5e0 Hunter Biden defies House GOP subpoena, demanding public hearing at the Capitol President Joe Biden’s son has insisted, through his attorney, that he wants to testify publicly and not in a private meeting Republicans pushed for.
dot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 1:29 am
That's what you've been doing from day one on this. Did Comer and co offer public or private testimony? Did Comer and co lie about Devon Archer's testimony? Did Comer and co lie about their bombshell Joe Biden evidence which turned out to be loan repayments, which they themselves disclosed via investigation? Did Comer and co ever come up with a crime that Joe Biden is supposed to have committed, let alone come up with evidence for said claim?
So yeah, dodge(s) noted, hack.
dot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 4:41 pm
Hunter Biden, a private citizen, has more bravery than Jim Jordan who still hasn't showed up for his subpoena.
CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 1:16 am
Dodge noted.
That's what you've been doing from day one on this. Did Comer and co offer public or private testimony? Did Comer and co lie about Devon Archer's testimony? Did Comer and co lie about their bombshell Joe Biden evidence which turned out to be loan repayments, which they themselves disclosed via investigation? Did Comer and co ever come up with a crime that Joe Biden is supposed to have committed, let alone come up with evidence for said claim?
So yeah, dodge(s) noted, hack.
You continue to avoid the very straightforward question. Thats you dodging (again!).
The subpoena is current and the authority here; thats what matters and the subpoena does not offer a public option. Anything previous is irrelevant because, well....its literally irrelevant with the issuance of the legal subpoena. Thats the bottom line. You keep saying it like the subpoena gave an option. It didnt. The subpoena called for a closed door session which your boy didnt like so he showed up at the wrong place and held a press conference because he wants to make his own rules. The committee rejected the public offer last month. The subpoena is what it is and it says what it says. He doesnt get to change it to his liking. Your boy defied the subpoena. Thats the bottom line.
https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden ... 3e5d98b5e0 Hunter Biden defies House GOP subpoena, demanding public hearing at the Capitol President Joe Biden’s son has insisted, through his attorney, that he wants to testify publicly and not in a private meeting Republicans pushed for.
