UJRefugees.net

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:49 pm Yeah, because moderates unwilling to steer hard left will have no issue steering hard right

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:51 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:49 pm Yeah, because moderates unwilling to steer hard left will have no issue steering hard right

They wont be motivated to vote. Some will actually rethink their beliefs, and switch parties.

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:05 pm

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:51 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:49 pm Yeah, because moderates unwilling to steer hard left will have no issue steering hard right

They wont be motivated to vote. Some will actually rethink their beliefs, and switch parties.

That works both ways, Trumps antics are causing some to leave the party

https://www.dispatch.com/news/20190301/ ... -in-future

She said her decision was not based on voting trends that have made it increasingly difficult for Republican candidates in Franklin County to win countywide election.

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:26 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:05 pm

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:51 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:49 pm Yeah, because moderates unwilling to steer hard left will have no issue steering hard right

They wont be motivated to vote. Some will actually rethink their beliefs, and switch parties.

That works both ways, Trumps antics are causing some to leave the party

https://www.dispatch.com/news/20190301/ ... -in-future

She said her decision was not based on voting trends that have made it increasingly difficult for Republican candidates in Franklin County to win countywide election.

Dunno about her, but the neocons can stay gone, as far as I'm concerned. They want us in a perpetual state of war, and are beholden to Israel.

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:29 pm

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:26 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:05 pm

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:51 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 10:49 pm Yeah, because moderates unwilling to steer hard left will have no issue steering hard right

They wont be motivated to vote. Some will actually rethink their beliefs, and switch parties.

That works both ways, Trumps antics are causing some to leave the party

https://www.dispatch.com/news/20190301/ ... -in-future

She said her decision was not based on voting trends that have made it increasingly difficult for Republican candidates in Franklin County to win countywide election.

Dunno about her, but the neocons can stay gone, as far as I'm concerned. They want us in a perpetual state of war, and are beholden to Israel.

You dropped this

“I’ve been a registered Republican since I was 18, and 41 years later I do not recognize the Republican Party as it is today,” she said on Friday. “And I’m not the same person I was when I was 18.

In November, Democrats won six of seven races for Franklin County Common Pleas Court. In 2017, Democrats won three of the four contested Municipal Court races in the county.

Brad Sinnott, a county Republican party chairman, said he doesn’t believe that Lynch is leaving the party because of national politics.
Listen to the latest Buckeye Forum politics podcast:

“Here’s the obvious truth: There are more Democratic voters in Franklin County than Republican voters,” he said. “Everybody gets why she has now declared herself a Democrat. She thinks it’s going to be an easier life.

analhamster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:01 am They hate non republicans above all. Gender, race, ethnicity, sexuality, they're all just avenues of attack. There is a section of the base that is prejudiced against women, non whites, gays etc, that's why those avenues of attack work with republican voters, but I suspect for a lot of the republicans who'll endlessly attack minorities running for the dems it's mostly just about them being dems. Get them a gay black woman republican with a shot and they'll fall over themselves to show how enlightened they are with their support. Not gonna happen for them for a while though on the national level because it does lose a fairly significant chunk of their voters who do just straight up not like non old white men for office.

analhamster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:14 pm It would have been national suicide for absolutely no reason at all. They relied on US support back then too. I've been trying to find a conspiracy theory explanation of the motive but there doesn't seem to be one, I guess being jews is motive enough to explain the nefarious intent.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:40 pm

analhamster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:01 am They hate non republicans above all. Gender, race, ethnicity, sexuality, they're all just avenues of attack. There is a section of the base that is prejudiced against women, non whites, gays etc, that's why those avenues of attack work with republican voters, but I suspect for a lot of the republicans who'll endlessly attack minorities running for the dems it's mostly just about them being dems. Get them a gay black woman republican with a shot and they'll fall over themselves to show how enlightened they are with their support. Not gonna happen for them for a while though on the national level because it does lose a fairly significant chunk of their voters who do just straight up not like non old white men for office.

This is some loopy shit, even for you. It's the left that perpetuates a continual state of race war. Your spew fails to account that in US popular culture blacks enjoy very high status and regard. Which crossss party lines.

Your drivel about the only reason republicans support minorities as tokens is such a tired old rusty foil.

"Look at the filthy right. The only reason they put a black woman in as Secretary of State is for pandering purposes. The nerve of them."

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:40 pm

analhamster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:01 am They hate non republicans above all. Gender, race, ethnicity, sexuality, they're all just avenues of attack. There is a section of the base that is prejudiced against women, non whites, gays etc, that's why those avenues of attack work with republican voters, but I suspect for a lot of the republicans who'll endlessly attack minorities running for the dems it's mostly just about them being dems. Get them a gay black woman republican with a shot and they'll fall over themselves to show how enlightened they are with their support. Not gonna happen for them for a while though on the national level because it does lose a fairly significant chunk of their voters who do just straight up not like non old white men for office.

This is some loopy shit, even for you. It's the left that perpetuates a continual state of race war. Your spew fails to account that in US popular culture blacks enjoy very high status and regard. Which crossss party lines.

Your drivel about the only reason republicans support minorities as tokens is such a tired old rusty foil.

"Look at the filthy right. The only reason they put a black woman in as Secretary of State is for pandering purposes. The nerve of them."

Get them a gay black woman republican with a shot and they'll fall over themselves to show how enlightened they are with their support

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:28 pm

Get them a gay black woman republican with a shot and they'll fall over themselves to show how enlightened they are with their support

Your spew leaves nothing to the imagination.

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:43 pm Don't care about Obama's accusers, just like you don't care about democrat history.

You assert that it's policy for republicans to use tokens. If they don't they're racist. If they do, they're racist. Ur a repetitive, pompous dolt.

Time for another break from you.

As an aside, I just bought $2500 in British Sterling for my April trip to Cuba. 1.39. Probably should have waited. We'll see.

analhamster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 4:30 pm

Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:43 pm Don't care about Obama's accusers, just like you don't care about democrat history.

You assert that it's policy for republicans to use tokens. If they don't they're racist. If they do, they're racist. Ur a repetitive, pompous dolt.

Time for another break from you.

As an aside, I just bought $2500 in British Sterling for my April trip to Cuba. 1.39. Probably should have waited. We'll see.

Democrat history? I'm aware of it, I assume you refer to me understanding that it is history rather than today, which you can't grasp.

You refuse to answer that simple question because it demonstrates what I said is in fact true. There was a big racist backlash against Obama, the democrat, yet not one against Condi, the Republican. You're making the jump to that meaning support, or the absence of attacks, for her was due to her being a token black, that is not what I said. I said it was due to her being a republican.

Yet again, you have brought up this token thing, I have not. Since you don't appear to have understood what I said all I can suggest is you try reading it again. This token thing is all you.


I think it's pretty inevitable there'll be a brexit extension through April leading to a slight bump in sterling, in which case actually not a bad time to buy. If we crash out then very bad time to buy though. They don't accept dollars in Cuba?