UJRefugees.net

Per the Washington Post she is not in favor of impeaching Trump. Since we all know Putin is controlling Trump and the indictments are just days away - wouldn't it mean Nancy is also controlled by Putin? What other reason would there be to not impeach him?

I think Nancy is controlled (or at the very least squeezed) by the fringe in her party right now.

Because she knows that The Senate is controlled by spineless/compromised Republicans that would never vote to convict Trump. It's called living in a reality where most of the legislative branch of government is unwilling to do their jobs.

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:17 pm Because she knows that The Senate is controlled by spineless/compromised Republicans that would never vote to convict Trump. It's called living in a reality where most of the legislative branch of government is unwilling to do their jobs.

This is quality information. So her reasoning in the interview is a lie?

beagleboy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:23 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:17 pm Because she knows that The Senate is controlled by spineless/compromised Republicans that would never vote to convict Trump. It's called living in a reality where most of the legislative branch of government is unwilling to do their jobs.

This is quality information. So her reasoning in the interview is a lie?

It makes more sense then the bullshit you wrote

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:25 pm

beagleboy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:23 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:17 pm Because she knows that The Senate is controlled by spineless/compromised Republicans that would never vote to convict Trump. It's called living in a reality where most of the legislative branch of government is unwilling to do their jobs.

This is quality information. So her reasoning in the interview is a lie?

It makes more sense then the bullshit you wrote

So when are the indictments against Trump coming? Or maybe the idea is Mueller won't charge him because it doesn't matter anyway?

beagleboy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:29 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:25 pm

beagleboy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:23 pm

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:17 pm Because she knows that The Senate is controlled by spineless/compromised Republicans that would never vote to convict Trump. It's called living in a reality where most of the legislative branch of government is unwilling to do their jobs.

This is quality information. So her reasoning in the interview is a lie?

It makes more sense then the bullshit you wrote

So when are the indictments against Trump coming? Or maybe the idea is Mueller won't charge him because it doesn't matter anyway?

When Mueller is done

She didn't rule out impeaching trump, she said she wouldn't like to because it is a very divisive event for the country and it would have be something compelling, overwhelming and bipartisan. I read that as saying that things like being an unindicted co conspirator in Cohen's crime wouldn't cross the line for her, while active collusion with Russia would. It's not like the republican senate pussies would allow impeachment anyway, and impeachment proceedings would be premature before the Mueller report is out and analysed.

Her real reason of course is that she wants trump running in 2020. That's just good politics. He'll be indicted when he leaves office either way.

Seems like Pelosi would know if they had anything impeachable on Trump.

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:42 pm Seems like Pelosi would know if they had anything impeachable on Trump.

Beyond the impeachable things we all already know they have on trump, how? Do you think Mueller is leaking his stuff to the democrat leadership?

Impeachment will come any day now.

You guys are going to be saying that long after his re-election I bet.

beagleboy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:11 pm Per the Washington Post she is not in favor of impeaching Trump. Since we all know Putin is controlling Trump and the indictments are just days away - wouldn't it mean Nancy is also controlled by Putin? What other reason would there be to not impeach him?

She knows the long game and is on board with it.

Trump is part of that plan, and she will never do anything meaningful against him.

Literally zero people here have said impeachment will come any day now

analhamster wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:49 pm

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:42 pm Seems like Pelosi would know if they had anything impeachable on Trump.

Beyond the impeachable things we all already know they have on trump, how? Do you think Mueller is leaking his stuff to the democrat leadership?

I think Washington is a sieve. If there was something big coming up, I think she would have heard about it. Impeachment has to be major, or it backfires on the impeaching party.

Let me add that Trump is not popular with a LOT of beltway insiders, not just the Democrats. Neocons hate him. Basically, the establishment hates him.

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:53 pm Literally zero people here have said impeachment will come any day now

Oh... my bad.

So I suppose you are hoping Mueller will indict Trump so... he stays in office for as long as possible then?

Very Pelosian.

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:13 pm

analhamster wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:49 pm

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:42 pm Seems like Pelosi would know if they had anything impeachable on Trump.

Beyond the impeachable things we all already know they have on trump, how? Do you think Mueller is leaking his stuff to the democrat leadership?

I think Washington is a sieve. If there was something big coming up, I think she would have heard about it. Impeachment has to be major, or it backfires on the impeaching party.

Let me add that Trump is not popular with a LOT of beltway insiders, not just the Democrats. Neocons hate him. Basically, the establishment hates him.

The Mueller investigation has not leaked. If it had the washington sieve would have passed it on.

Neocons who haven't retired from office yet are mostly showing him blind allegiance. And impeachment doesn't necessarily backfire if unsuccessful the Clinton attempt was damaging despite being unsuccessful. Pelosi just doesn't need it, Trump can't really get more damaged and it'll feed into his constant whining about conspiracies and persecution with the people who'll support him no matter what. Given the absolutely certainty of blind trump support in McConnell's senate, there's just no point on the impeachable offences shown to date. The ideal result of the Mueller investigation for Pelosi is more damaging revelations but nothing that forces her hand on impeachment, she wants the wounded snowflake campaigning in 2020.

Not to mention she can ride him around like a pony till then

captquint wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:32 pm Not to mention she can ride him around like a pony till then

Probably pee on him too.

I eagerly await the release of the mueller report and the enumeration of trump’s crimes.

We're going to need to put captcunty on suicide watch when the Mueller report comes out and its a big let down.

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:56 am We're going to need to put captcunty on suicide watch when the Mueller report comes out and its a big let down.

Or maybe not, since you know Trump has interfered with the investigations of him at every turn, as innocent people do

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:56 am We're going to need to put captcunty on suicide watch when the Mueller report comes out and its a big let down.

Even Adam Schiff says it's okay to not impeach unless we get "graphic" evidence. That's odd since we supposedly have all this massive proven evidence. It's just not worth the effort because removing a criminal in the White House is just too much damn work.

Interestingly, Hillary herself has moved on and come up with new reasons she lost.

beagleboy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:40 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:56 am We're going to need to put captcunty on suicide watch when the Mueller report comes out and its a big let down.

Even Adam Schiff says it's okay to not impeach unless we get "graphic" evidence. That's odd since we supposedly have all this massive proven evidence. It's just not worth the effort because removing a criminal in the White House is just too much damn work.

Interestingly, Hillary herself has moved on and come up with new reasons she lost.

I spend about $400-500 per month on Facebook advertising (soccer moms still love them some Facebook, ). How much did the Russians spend in totality? Lolz.

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 3:44 pm

beagleboy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:40 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:56 am We're going to need to put captcunty on suicide watch when the Mueller report comes out and its a big let down.

Even Adam Schiff says it's okay to not impeach unless we get "graphic" evidence. That's odd since we supposedly have all this massive proven evidence. It's just not worth the effort because removing a criminal in the White House is just too much damn work.

Interestingly, Hillary herself has moved on and come up with new reasons she lost.

I spend about $400-500 per month on Facebook advertising (soccer moms still love them some Facebook, ). How much did the Russians spend in totality? Lolz.

How many does people does your 4-500 reach? Russia ads got 10 million. Their main thrust though was propaganda disseminated through fake accounts, the kind of trope biker compulsively passes on. They got 340 million shares with that stuff with thousands of trolls working on it. They also hacked and released damaging emails, and hacked into state voter registration systems. It's not known how much all this cost them, but I'd imagine it was quite a hefty price tag. Military operations tend to be well funded and this was the GRU.

I don't see that there's anything that can be done to stop Russia - or Russians - from tweeting or otherwise trying to effect the election. As far as money is concerned, I'd be very interested to see what kind of money Israel spends or encourages others to spend on our election. Also countries like Saudi Arabia.

VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:21 pm I don't see that there's anything that can be done to stop Russia - or Russians - from tweeting or otherwise trying to effect the election. As far as money is concerned, I'd be very interested to see what kind of money Israel spends or encourages others to spend on our election. Also countries like Saudi Arabia.

Presidential Candidates and their staff should not cooperate and seek their aid for starters