The shift towards trannyism

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 20919
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#26

Post by Animal »

Image
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Interests: music, tits, literature, cheese and Letterkenny
Occupation: I play guitar for a living

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#27

Post by Deathproof »

Reservoir Dog wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:20 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:08 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:48 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:06 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 6:52 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 5:44 pm

No, they aren't.

But to answer your question: Nobody is afraid of them. And quite honestly, if a guy wants to put on makeup and a dress and cosplay as a woman -- which is what they're doing -- most of us don't give a shit. Go ahead. Play adult make-believe all you want.

But where I, and I suspect many others, take issue is when we're expected to play along and humor their childish games. Why is my participation required in your self-delusion?
Bigotry defined right there.
Not even remotely. I don't think these words mean what you think they mean.
It's the word "they" always throw out. Fighting against something you believe to be wrong. It's why for decades people fought back when gays said "We want gay rights". "We want gay marriage". Why? Because we already knew how it would turn out. Finally said fine- have your gay rights and gay marriage. Not a year later- "Now we want it taught as normal in schools, glorified in Ads and Hollywood, have the 97% of the population pander to our every whim". And we were correct. Give them an inch and they will want a mile.
I have no issue with the gay marriage. Never did. But I had a HUGE problem with the arguments they made for it, when they presented it as an "equal rights" issue -- because gays ALWAYS HAD equal rights when it came to marriage.
That is simply not true.
It is 100% true.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 10403
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#28

Post by Reservoir Dog »

Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 9:23 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:20 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:08 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:48 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:06 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 6:52 pm

Bigotry defined right there.
Not even remotely. I don't think these words mean what you think they mean.
It's the word "they" always throw out. Fighting against something you believe to be wrong. It's why for decades people fought back when gays said "We want gay rights". "We want gay marriage". Why? Because we already knew how it would turn out. Finally said fine- have your gay rights and gay marriage. Not a year later- "Now we want it taught as normal in schools, glorified in Ads and Hollywood, have the 97% of the population pander to our every whim". And we were correct. Give them an inch and they will want a mile.
I have no issue with the gay marriage. Never did. But I had a HUGE problem with the arguments they made for it, when they presented it as an "equal rights" issue -- because gays ALWAYS HAD equal rights when it came to marriage.
That is simply not true.
It is 100% true.
Your Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in all 50 states in 2015. Prior to that, it was only legal in a handful of states and not until 1972.
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:00 am You both fucked up. You trusted me.
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Not really a Libertarian
Posts: 9889
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#29

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 5:44 pm
Evil.Fkn.Mean,Nasty wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 2:52 pm Why you idiots give so much fear mongering air play to gays and trans and anyone else not "normal" and white.

Why do you care? Are they a threat to you? And dont bring up this Bible BS that you quote. No one is as unchristian as you knobs.

I've worked with Trans people. One of my best buddies is marring a dude this summer. SO WHAT.

They are normal regular people just trying to find their way.

What are you afraid of?
No, they aren't.

But to answer your question: Nobody is afraid of them. And quite honestly, if a guy wants to put on makeup and a dress and cosplay as a woman -- which is what they're doing -- most of us don't give a shit. Go ahead. Play adult make-believe all you want.

But where I, and I suspect many others, take issue is when we're expected to play along and humor their childish games. Why is my participation required in your self-delusion?
Pretty much.
Image
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 20919
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#30

Post by Animal »

Reservoir Dog wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 9:27 pm Your Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in all 50 states in 2015. Prior to that, it was only legal in a handful of states and not until 1972.
The only hiccup that I can see for same sex marriage in Texas is that one of the people has to be a man and the other a woman. I'm not sure how they get around that.
User avatar
Biker
Soulless Fuck
Posts: 8923
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#31

Post by Biker »

Image
Image
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 20919
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#32

Post by Animal »

who could have guessed that they couldn't agree on one flag?
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Interests: music, tits, literature, cheese and Letterkenny
Occupation: I play guitar for a living

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#33

Post by Deathproof »

Reservoir Dog wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 9:27 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 9:23 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:20 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:08 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:48 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:06 pm

Not even remotely. I don't think these words mean what you think they mean.
It's the word "they" always throw out. Fighting against something you believe to be wrong. It's why for decades people fought back when gays said "We want gay rights". "We want gay marriage". Why? Because we already knew how it would turn out. Finally said fine- have your gay rights and gay marriage. Not a year later- "Now we want it taught as normal in schools, glorified in Ads and Hollywood, have the 97% of the population pander to our every whim". And we were correct. Give them an inch and they will want a mile.
I have no issue with the gay marriage. Never did. But I had a HUGE problem with the arguments they made for it, when they presented it as an "equal rights" issue -- because gays ALWAYS HAD equal rights when it came to marriage.
That is simply not true.
It is 100% true.
Your Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in all 50 states in 2015. Prior to that, it was only legal in a handful of states and not until 1972.
And yet, they still had ABSOLUTELY EQUAL RIGHTS in terms of marriage. I can see this is way above your intellect, so I'll explain.

Prior to legalization of gay marriage in 2015, people of the same sex could not get married.
This means that a gay man could not marry another man, and a gay woman could not marry another woman. [Being that these are the only two genders that actually exist, these are the only two I will discuss here].
This also meant that a straight man could not marry another man, and a straight woman could not marry another woman.

However, a gay man could marry a person of the opposite sex. A gay woman could marry a person of the opposite sex. A straight man could marry a person of the opposite sex. A straight woman could marry a person of the opposite sex.

So, what we've figured out here is that both gay people AND normal people could marry people of the opposite sex, and that gay people AND straight people could NOT marry people of the same sex.

Well I'll be damned; everybody had EQUAL RIGHTS concerning marriage all along.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
Biker
Soulless Fuck
Posts: 8923
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#34

Post by Biker »

Animal wrote: Tue Apr 05, 2022 9:50 pm who could have guessed that they couldn't agree on one flag?
Sexualizing 9 years olds in order to validate the mental illness in adults. Its sick
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#35

Post by saltydog »

Which party was the one that just made it legal to marry at any age in Tennessee?
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Interests: music, tits, literature, cheese and Letterkenny
Occupation: I play guitar for a living

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#36

Post by Deathproof »

saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:19 am Which party was the one that just made it legal to marry at any age in Tennessee?
Nice mischaracterization, but that's not even remotely what that bill is about. The bill is about common-law marriages; it in no way implies somebody can take a child to a courthouse and marry them.
Specifically, the law is intended to codify into law that common-law marriages are only recognized if they're between a male and a female -- in other words, it invalidates any same-sex common-law marriage.

Predictably, retarded liberals like yourself who didn't even bother to know what they're talking about before making false claims like yours are more concerned with the unfairness to gays and lesbians than with what they mistakenly believe are trafficked children.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#37

Post by saltydog »

Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:27 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:19 am Which party was the one that just made it legal to marry at any age in Tennessee?
Nice mischaracterization, but that's not even remotely what that bill is about. The bill is about common-law marriages; it in no way implies somebody can take a child to a courthouse and marry them.
Specifically, the law is intended to codify into law that common-law marriages are only recognized if they're between a male and a female -- in other words, it invalidates any same-sex common-law marriage.

Predictably, retarded liberals like yourself who didn't even bother to know what they're talking about before making false claims like yours are more concerned with the unfairness to gays and lesbians than with what they mistakenly believe are trafficked children.
Congratulations, you're correct about everything.

I hope your continued insulting nature provides warmth and comfort to your soul.
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Interests: music, tits, literature, cheese and Letterkenny
Occupation: I play guitar for a living

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#38

Post by Deathproof »

saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:38 am
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:27 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:19 am Which party was the one that just made it legal to marry at any age in Tennessee?
Nice mischaracterization, but that's not even remotely what that bill is about. The bill is about common-law marriages; it in no way implies somebody can take a child to a courthouse and marry them.
Specifically, the law is intended to codify into law that common-law marriages are only recognized if they're between a male and a female -- in other words, it invalidates any same-sex common-law marriage.

Predictably, retarded liberals like yourself who didn't even bother to know what they're talking about before making false claims like yours are more concerned with the unfairness to gays and lesbians than with what they mistakenly believe are trafficked children.
Congratulations, you're correct about everything.

I hope your continued insulting nature provides warmth and comfort to your soul.
Being right does. Correcting the frequent -- dare I say constant? -- misconceptions of liberals does too. I remain very nice, very evil.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#39

Post by saltydog »

Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:05 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:38 am
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:27 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:19 am Which party was the one that just made it legal to marry at any age in Tennessee?
Nice mischaracterization, but that's not even remotely what that bill is about. The bill is about common-law marriages; it in no way implies somebody can take a child to a courthouse and marry them.
Specifically, the law is intended to codify into law that common-law marriages are only recognized if they're between a male and a female -- in other words, it invalidates any same-sex common-law marriage.

Predictably, retarded liberals like yourself who didn't even bother to know what they're talking about before making false claims like yours are more concerned with the unfairness to gays and lesbians than with what they mistakenly believe are trafficked children.
Congratulations, you're correct about everything.

I hope your continued insulting nature provides warmth and comfort to your soul.
Being right does. Correcting the frequent -- dare I say constant? -- misconceptions of liberals does too. I remain very nice, very evil.
Liberal messaging has never been a strength.
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
Antknot
UJR's Military Attaché
Posts: 5413
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#40

Post by Antknot »

Image
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#41

Post by saltydog »

Antknot wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 2:48 pm Image
This @COLDKRMA dude seems like a legit source.
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
User avatar
Deathproof
UJR гитара герой чемпион
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Interests: music, tits, literature, cheese and Letterkenny
Occupation: I play guitar for a living

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#42

Post by Deathproof »

saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:25 pm
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:05 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:38 am
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:27 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:19 am Which party was the one that just made it legal to marry at any age in Tennessee?
Nice mischaracterization, but that's not even remotely what that bill is about. The bill is about common-law marriages; it in no way implies somebody can take a child to a courthouse and marry them.
Specifically, the law is intended to codify into law that common-law marriages are only recognized if they're between a male and a female -- in other words, it invalidates any same-sex common-law marriage.

Predictably, retarded liberals like yourself who didn't even bother to know what they're talking about before making false claims like yours are more concerned with the unfairness to gays and lesbians than with what they mistakenly believe are trafficked children.
Congratulations, you're correct about everything.

I hope your continued insulting nature provides warmth and comfort to your soul.
Being right does. Correcting the frequent -- dare I say constant? -- misconceptions of liberals does too. I remain very nice, very evil.
Liberal messaging has never been a strength.
That is a fact. Nearly everything that comes from the mouths and keyboards of liberals is ridiculous.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#43

Post by saltydog »

Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:43 pm
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:25 pm
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:05 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:38 am
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:27 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:19 am Which party was the one that just made it legal to marry at any age in Tennessee?
Nice mischaracterization, but that's not even remotely what that bill is about. The bill is about common-law marriages; it in no way implies somebody can take a child to a courthouse and marry them.
Specifically, the law is intended to codify into law that common-law marriages are only recognized if they're between a male and a female -- in other words, it invalidates any same-sex common-law marriage.

Predictably, retarded liberals like yourself who didn't even bother to know what they're talking about before making false claims like yours are more concerned with the unfairness to gays and lesbians than with what they mistakenly believe are trafficked children.
Congratulations, you're correct about everything.

I hope your continued insulting nature provides warmth and comfort to your soul.
Being right does. Correcting the frequent -- dare I say constant? -- misconceptions of liberals does too. I remain very nice, very evil.
Liberal messaging has never been a strength.
That is a fact. Nearly everything that comes from the mouths and keyboards of liberals is ridiculous.
C'mon man, I'm trying to get better. My most recent political bias shows that I'm just barely left of center. It would be nice to have reasonable back and forth without name calling or sweeping generalizations.

"Some people's idea of free speech is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone says anything back, that's an outrage." -Winston Churchill
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
User avatar
Biker
Soulless Fuck
Posts: 8923
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#44

Post by Biker »

saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:25 pm
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:43 pm
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:25 pm
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:05 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:38 am
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:27 am

Nice mischaracterization, but that's not even remotely what that bill is about. The bill is about common-law marriages; it in no way implies somebody can take a child to a courthouse and marry them.
Specifically, the law is intended to codify into law that common-law marriages are only recognized if they're between a male and a female -- in other words, it invalidates any same-sex common-law marriage.

Predictably, retarded liberals like yourself who didn't even bother to know what they're talking about before making false claims like yours are more concerned with the unfairness to gays and lesbians than with what they mistakenly believe are trafficked children.
Congratulations, you're correct about everything.

I hope your continued insulting nature provides warmth and comfort to your soul.
Being right does. Correcting the frequent -- dare I say constant? -- misconceptions of liberals does too. I remain very nice, very evil.
Liberal messaging has never been a strength.
That is a fact. Nearly everything that comes from the mouths and keyboards of liberals is ridiculous.
C'mon man, I'm trying to get better. My most recent political bias shows that I'm just barely left of center. It would be nice to have reasonable back and forth without name calling or sweeping generalizations.

"Some people's idea of free speech is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone says anything back, that's an outrage." -Winston Churchill
So where do you lean right on a big issue?
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#45

Post by saltydog »

Biker wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:33 pm
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:25 pm
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:43 pm
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:25 pm
Deathproof wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:05 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 12:38 am

Congratulations, you're correct about everything.

I hope your continued insulting nature provides warmth and comfort to your soul.
Being right does. Correcting the frequent -- dare I say constant? -- misconceptions of liberals does too. I remain very nice, very evil.
Liberal messaging has never been a strength.
That is a fact. Nearly everything that comes from the mouths and keyboards of liberals is ridiculous.
C'mon man, I'm trying to get better. My most recent political bias shows that I'm just barely left of center. It would be nice to have reasonable back and forth without name calling or sweeping generalizations.

"Some people's idea of free speech is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone says anything back, that's an outrage." -Winston Churchill
So where do you lean right on a big issue?
This smells like bait. I'm going to ask what constitutes a "big issue".
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
User avatar
Biker
Soulless Fuck
Posts: 8923
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#46

Post by Biker »

As I thought.....carry on
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#47

Post by saltydog »

Biker wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 4:53 pm As I thought.....carry on
I'm fiscally conservative, in favor of smaller government (less waste/pork), and not a fan of affirmative action.

I don't think everyone deserves a participation trophy, but basic human rights should be respected.

One side seems to see things as "Option A or B" where the other side has "Option A, B, C, D, etc..." which is where messaging bungles things for the left.
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
User avatar
Biker
Soulless Fuck
Posts: 8923
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#48

Post by Biker »

User avatar
Biker
Soulless Fuck
Posts: 8923
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#49

Post by Biker »

Image
Image
User avatar
saltydog
Whole Lotta Nothin'
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: The shift towards trannyism

#50

Post by saltydog »

Biker wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 7:27 pm Image
Image
Cute.
Trying to live up to the lowest expectations.
Post Reply