They want to cram everyone into a neat little box and it baffles them when they cant.Biker wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 3:59 pmYou have never really paid attention I see.Evil.Fkn.Mean,Nasty wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 3:55 pmWait...what? You dont agree with the crazy righties?Biker wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 3:53 pmExactly. WE need more abortions in the inner cities, not less. And the federal govt should pay for themdisco.moon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 12:11 pm Gonna be lots and lots of new babies on welfare and in the foster care system. It's gonna be great!! WEvE gotta SaVE tEH bAbIes!!!
The End of Roe vs. Wade
Moderator: Biker
- CHEEZY17
- Libertarian house cat
- Posts: 14908
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13084
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
And they believe theyre the free thinkersCHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 4:02 pmThey want to cram everyone into a neat little box and it baffles them when they cant.Biker wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 3:59 pmYou have never really paid attention I see.Evil.Fkn.Mean,Nasty wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 3:55 pmWait...what? You dont agree with the crazy righties?Biker wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 3:53 pmExactly. WE need more abortions in the inner cities, not less. And the federal govt should pay for themdisco.moon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 12:11 pm Gonna be lots and lots of new babies on welfare and in the foster care system. It's gonna be great!! WEvE gotta SaVE tEH bAbIes!!!
- Charliesheen
- Snarky Fucker
- Posts: 9252
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
I’d say anytime the federal government sticks its nose in something clearly not spelled out in the constitution, it needs to be slapped down. The gap between shit-hole states would be greater if so.QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 2:28 pmOne could certainly argue about the past and present makeups of two biggest national parties. But, in the past, Republicans supported such amendments both that passed and failed:Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 1:54 pm I’ll never understand why so many Americans believe everything is the purview of the federal government. Actually, we all know exactly why.
Failed: transportation infrastructure and funding under federal control
Failed: amendment to regulate child labor laws
Passed: 18th/21st amendments, to establish/repeal Prohibition
Failed: a proto-ERA amendment and a two-term limit to presidential terms (at a later time the 22th amendment)
Failed: anti-busing amendment
Failed: amendments for "Right to Life" and school prayer
Failed: victim's rights amendment
Failed: "marriage protection" amendment ie to prohibit same-sex marriages.
How much are any of these Republican backed amendment attempts really in the "purview of the federal government"? Any and all of them stymie in some fashion state rights to run their states as they see fit. We didn't need to, at least then, amend the Constitution to allow the privacy rights to abortion, as it was spelled out right there in the 14th amendment.
It was decided that black people have rights like white folks. I’d say the scotus is claiming that if a decision is to be made that a full-term fully viable fetus is a danger to the mother’s mental health, that d&c blood belongs on the state legislatures hands. Not 9 robes sequestered from the folly of their decisions.
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13084
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
And something tells me this is a pure leftist distraction op to get our attentions away from Shit Show's performance and the coming recession
- saltydog
- Chief Biden Ballwasher
- Posts: 5313
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
- Location: Western East Coast
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
The Supreme Court's been broken for at least two decades anyways.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 4:06 pmI’d say anytime the federal government sticks its nose in something clearly not spelled out in the constitution, it needs to be slapped down. The gap between shit-hole states would be greater if so.QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 2:28 pmOne could certainly argue about the past and present makeups of two biggest national parties. But, in the past, Republicans supported such amendments both that passed and failed:Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 1:54 pm I’ll never understand why so many Americans believe everything is the purview of the federal government. Actually, we all know exactly why.
Failed: transportation infrastructure and funding under federal control
Failed: amendment to regulate child labor laws
Passed: 18th/21st amendments, to establish/repeal Prohibition
Failed: a proto-ERA amendment and a two-term limit to presidential terms (at a later time the 22th amendment)
Failed: anti-busing amendment
Failed: amendments for "Right to Life" and school prayer
Failed: victim's rights amendment
Failed: "marriage protection" amendment ie to prohibit same-sex marriages.
How much are any of these Republican backed amendment attempts really in the "purview of the federal government"? Any and all of them stymie in some fashion state rights to run their states as they see fit. We didn't need to, at least then, amend the Constitution to allow the privacy rights to abortion, as it was spelled out right there in the 14th amendment.
It was decided that black people have rights like white folks. I’d say the scotus is claiming that if a decision is to be made that a full-term fully viable fetus is a danger to the mother’s mental health, that d&c blood belongs on the state legislatures hands. Not 9 robes sequestered from the folly of their decisions.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28041
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
-
- No life apart from this stupid forum board
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:08 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
Hanger manufactures are doubling production.
du.du.du.dude looks like a lady
- Deathproof
- UJR гитара герой чемпион
- Posts: 5089
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
- Location: Чикаго, Иллинойс
- Interests: музыка, сиськи, литература, сыр и Леттеркенни
- Occupation: Я играю на гитаре для жизни
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
What, exactly, are "women's rights"? How are they distinct from anyone else's rights? What rights do women have or not have that anyone else has or doesn't have?QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 1:16 pm I suppose we can all read into this what we will. But the Roe v Wade ruling was mostly based on the Due Process clause of the 14th amendment which establishes the right to personal privacy, that a person cannot be deprived of "life, liberty, and property" without due process. Alito in his draft opinion made it clear (and explicitly so) that he did not believe Roe v Wade was "deeply rooted in history", along with other rulings based on privacy rights that legalized sodomy and same-sex marriage. He, again explicitly, said these were "phony rights", not real and actual rights that a person has as a citizen and resident of US lands. So..., what else is a "phony right" to Alito's thinking? Mixed race marriage, maybe? Religious rights? Women's rights? Any other rights that seem "icky" to him?
Privacy for me, but not for thee, it looks like.
I'd be curious to know this, especially a ith an incoming SC Justice who doesn't know what a woman is, despite being one.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
- Deathproof
- UJR гитара герой чемпион
- Posts: 5089
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:42 pm
- Location: Чикаго, Иллинойс
- Interests: музыка, сиськи, литература, сыр и Леттеркенни
- Occupation: Я играю на гитаре для жизни
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
Not really, though. Once a conservative majority was in place, it was repaired.saltydog wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 4:11 pmThe Supreme Court's been broken for at least two decades anyways.Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 4:06 pmI’d say anytime the federal government sticks its nose in something clearly not spelled out in the constitution, it needs to be slapped down. The gap between shit-hole states would be greater if so.QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 2:28 pmOne could certainly argue about the past and present makeups of two biggest national parties. But, in the past, Republicans supported such amendments both that passed and failed:Charliesheen wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 1:54 pm I’ll never understand why so many Americans believe everything is the purview of the federal government. Actually, we all know exactly why.
Failed: transportation infrastructure and funding under federal control
Failed: amendment to regulate child labor laws
Passed: 18th/21st amendments, to establish/repeal Prohibition
Failed: a proto-ERA amendment and a two-term limit to presidential terms (at a later time the 22th amendment)
Failed: anti-busing amendment
Failed: amendments for "Right to Life" and school prayer
Failed: victim's rights amendment
Failed: "marriage protection" amendment ie to prohibit same-sex marriages.
How much are any of these Republican backed amendment attempts really in the "purview of the federal government"? Any and all of them stymie in some fashion state rights to run their states as they see fit. We didn't need to, at least then, amend the Constitution to allow the privacy rights to abortion, as it was spelled out right there in the 14th amendment.
It was decided that black people have rights like white folks. I’d say the scotus is claiming that if a decision is to be made that a full-term fully viable fetus is a danger to the mother’s mental health, that d&c blood belongs on the state legislatures hands. Not 9 robes sequestered from the folly of their decisions.
"Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids... no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.” -- lifelong segregationist Joe Biden
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13084
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
-
- Not UJR's Military Attaché
- Posts: 6741
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
- Location: South Carolina
- disco.moon
- Simply Exhausting
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
There was a whole study in the 90's about how crime and such went down after RVW. And there are just as many kids born to white uneducated, under-18 retards in the country as there are in the inner city.Biker wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 3:53 pmExactly. WE need more abortions in the inner cities, not less. And the federal govt should pay for themdisco.moon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 12:11 pm Gonna be lots and lots of new babies on welfare and in the foster care system. It's gonna be great!! WEvE gotta SaVE tEH bAbIes!!!
On the real, it eliminates safe abortion, not abortion. These women if they don't want to have that fucking baby - won't. So by any means necessary which puts her life in danger and ultimately tax payers pick up the cost if she lives long enough to make it to the hospital following a botched abortion - because let's be real - not alot of these women are using insurance to cover this shit. The conservative right only cares about "saving a baby". They could give zero fucks about feeding it, clothing it, schooling it. Then they bitch about people on welfare or straining public services... it's like the deck is stacked against the poor....
Wait a minute!!!!
- saltydog
- Chief Biden Ballwasher
- Posts: 5313
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
- Location: Western East Coast
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
Only if YOU are involved in the decision personally for yourself and a loved one.
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
- saltydog
- Chief Biden Ballwasher
- Posts: 5313
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
- Location: Western East Coast
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
How often have you gotten pregnant?
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28041
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
- JackCoughsALot
- the "edgy" one
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2021 11:05 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
oh sure. as soon as the pandemic ends, it's "my body, my choice" again.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28041
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
they probably timed it more to line up with the supreme court case finding that was just leaked.JackCoughsALot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 6:57 pm oh sure. as soon as the pandemic ends, it's "my body, my choice" again.
- Charliesheen
- Snarky Fucker
- Posts: 9252
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:49 am
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
A cunt is a cunt by any other name.
- disco.moon
- Simply Exhausting
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
So if a woman is pregnant with a fetus with some horrible deformity or disease or may kill her or rape/incest baby - removing that isn't healthcare? Some women going through fertility treatments to get pregnant sometimes have problems like that, helping her abort that fucked up deadly fetus isn't healthcare? Gtfoh.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28041
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
i will bet you money that these type of things have been "leaked" for years and years. Its only through the ease of social media avenues that they are now leaked into the public. It just seems like every damn thing is leaked anymore. Wasn't the Meuller report leaked? Trump's tax returns were leaked?BigRedRetard wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 7:23 pmWhoever leaked this should do some hard time.Animal wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 7:21 pmthey probably timed it more to line up with the supreme court case finding that was just leaked.JackCoughsALot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 6:57 pm oh sure. as soon as the pandemic ends, it's "my body, my choice" again.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28041
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
i wish i could get a nickel for every time "What if" is used in the next few weeks.
- disco.moon
- Simply Exhausting
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
So how does one argue abortion if it's not about what if? Just ban abortion period? I guess the what ifs definitely don't mean anything in Texas. That bitch is having her daddy's Mongoloid rape baby no matter what.
- disco.moon
- Simply Exhausting
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:11 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
What if Jesus was aborted huh? Let THAT sink in.
-
- Not UJR's Military Attaché
- Posts: 6741
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:30 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
Those are valid reasons. What percentage of current abortions fit thos criteria?disco.moon wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:07 pmSo if a woman is pregnant with a fetus with some horrible deformity or disease or may kill her or rape/incest baby - removing that isn't healthcare? Some women going through fertility treatments to get pregnant sometimes have problems like that, helping her abort that fucked up deadly fetus isn't healthcare? Gtfoh.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28041
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: The End of Roe vs. Wade
that's actually the "what if" that the other side would use. neither side has a monopoly on the use of "what if".
well, what if the mom of the person that gave jesus' mom an abortion had had an abortion?