This would be considered grooming

[Geist]

Lol uh huh

You disagree? I mean, it's demonstrably true.

Totally true

Prior to gay marriage being legalized nationwide, what right did gay people not have that normal people did have?

https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/differe ... %20reality.

Completely off-point. I'll ask again: prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?

Off-point at your operational level, important distinction. And before only 7 years ago you mean? Then until the 17 before that when being queerfolk was a legitimate excuse to deny someone. You can keep teaching small steps back but youre just being a contrarian for the sake of it.

[Burn1dwn]

If you don't like watching queers kiss, look away or reassess your coping mechanism.

Yeah, because thats what its about. Dimwit

I think you're lost:

viewtopic.php?t=4

Oh yeah I forgot you retards still think gays having rights diminishes what you have. Pathetic knuckle draggers smh

I've been pro-gay marriage long before the mainstream Democrat party was. You do understand that there are not just two streams of thought right, or are you too dense and unsophisticated to understand that?

Care to guess where I think you fall?

No intelligent person cares what you think, dipshit

Snopes rates this as true.

[Deathproof]

You disagree? I mean, it's demonstrably true.

Totally true

Prior to gay marriage being legalized nationwide, what right did gay people not have that normal people did have?

https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/differe ... %20reality.

Completely off-point. I'll ask again: prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?

Off-point at your operational level, important distinction.

No, just off-point entirely. My operational level is higher than yours.

And before only 7 years ago you mean? Then until the 17 before that when being queerfolk was a legitimate excuse to deny someone. You can keep teaching small steps back but youre just being a contrarian for the sake of it.

No, I'm dumbing things down to your level so that you can understand. So I will ask, AGAIN, what right did gays NOT have prior to the legalization of gay marriage nationwide that normal people DID have? Please, enlighten us all.

[Geist]

Totally true

Prior to gay marriage being legalized nationwide, what right did gay people not have that normal people did have?

https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/differe ... %20reality.

Completely off-point. I'll ask again: prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?

Off-point at your operational level, important distinction.

No, just off-point entirely. My operational level is higher than yours.

And before only 7 years ago you mean? Then until the 17 before that when being queerfolk was a legitimate excuse to deny someone. You can keep teaching small steps back but youre just being a contrarian for the sake of it.

No, I'm dumbing things down to your level so that you can understand. So I will ask, AGAIN, what right did gays NOT have prior to the legalization of gay marriage nationwide that normal people DID have? Please, enlighten us all.

To be enlightened, you have to be enlightenable, lil guy

[Burn1dwn]

No, I'm dumbing things down to your level so that you can understand. So I will ask, AGAIN, what right did gays NOT have prior to the legalization of gay marriage nationwide that normal people DID have? Please, enlighten us all.

Is this a riddle? You seem to be giving the answer in the question itself.

[Charliesheen]

Gays have the right to incubate and spread super diseases without incurring blame. Not all of them. Just the ones who have relations with a different partner at a frequency that non-rock star breeders can’t keep up with.

Got another one on the horizon.

In the US, 244 cases have been reported, with California having the most cases, with 62 being detected in the state.

It's followed by New York with 37, and Florida and Illinois both with 27.

Dr Sophia Makki, incident director at UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) said the outbreak in the UK is continuing to grow.

"We expect cases to continue to rise further in the coming days and weeks.

"If you are attending large events over the summer or having sex with new partners, be alert to any monkeypox symptoms so you can get tested rapidly and help avoid passing the infection on.

READ MORE ON MONKEYPOX
Monkeypox cases continue to rise in UK as number of new infections revealed
CLIMBING CASES Monkeypox cases continue to rise in UK as number of new infections revealed
Vaccines to be rolled out to more Brits as monkeypox spreads - are you eligible?
JABS UP Vaccines to be rolled out to more Brits as monkeypox spreads - are you eligible?
"Currently the majority of cases have been in men who are gay, bisexual or have sex with men.

"However, anyone who has had close contact with an individual with symptoms is also at increased risk."

[Animal]

No, I'm dumbing things down to your level so that you can understand. So I will ask, AGAIN, what right did gays NOT have prior to the legalization of gay marriage nationwide that normal people DID have? Please, enlighten us all.

Is this a riddle? You seem to be giving the answer in the question itself.

good one.

[Deathproof]

Gays have the right to incubate and spread super diseases without incurring blame. Not all of them. Just the ones who have relations with a different partner at a frequency that non-rock star breeders can’t keep up with.

Exactly. I still hear liberals trying to demonize President Ronald Reagan, who should be a canonized Saint by now, because when the queers were spreading AIDS all over the place and whining about how the gay community was suffering, he dared to suggest that they stop indiscriminately fucking everything that moved. How dare he suggest they modify their behavior and take a little responsibility for themselves?

[Deathproof]

Prior to gay marriage being legalized nationwide, what right did gay people not have that normal people did have?

https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/differe ... %20reality.

Completely off-point. I'll ask again: prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?

Off-point at your operational level, important distinction.

No, just off-point entirely. My operational level is higher than yours.

And before only 7 years ago you mean? Then until the 17 before that when being queerfolk was a legitimate excuse to deny someone. You can keep teaching small steps back but youre just being a contrarian for the sake of it.

No, I'm dumbing things down to your level so that you can understand. So I will ask, AGAIN, what right did gays NOT have prior to the legalization of gay marriage nationwide that normal people DID have? Please, enlighten us all.

To be enlightened, you have to be enlightenable, lil guy

Still dodging the question. I see.

[Deathproof]

No, I'm dumbing things down to your level so that you can understand. So I will ask, AGAIN, what right did gays NOT have prior to the legalization of gay marriage nationwide that normal people DID have? Please, enlighten us all.

Is this a riddle? You seem to be giving the answer in the question itself.

No, I'm not. I'm asking a legit question of a misinformed individual who thinks gay marriage was an equal rights issue. It most certainly was not, and that's a demonstrable fact.

[Geist]

https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/differe ... %20reality.

Completely off-point. I'll ask again: prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?

Off-point at your operational level, important distinction.

No, just off-point entirely. My operational level is higher than yours.

And before only 7 years ago you mean? Then until the 17 before that when being queerfolk was a legitimate excuse to deny someone. You can keep teaching small steps back but youre just being a contrarian for the sake of it.

No, I'm dumbing things down to your level so that you can understand. So I will ask, AGAIN, what right did gays NOT have prior to the legalization of gay marriage nationwide that normal people DID have? Please, enlighten us all.

To be enlightened, you have to be enlightenable, lil guy

Still dodging the question. I see.

No question was dodged, which would be noticed if you the victim of an unfixable broken brain. Poor lil guy

[Geist]

Gays have the right to incubate and spread super diseases without incurring blame. Not all of them. Just the ones who have relations with a different partner at a frequency that non-rock star breeders can’t keep up with.

Exactly. I still hear liberals trying to demonize President Ronald Reagan, who should be a canonized Saint by now, because when the queers were spreading AIDS all over the place and whining about how the gay community was suffering, he dared to suggest that they stop indiscriminately fucking everything that moved. How dare he suggest they modify their behavior and take a little responsibility for themselves?

Poor lil guy

[Geist]

10 years to buy an AA in humanities, now that's an achievable goal for a lil guy

[Deathproof]

10 years to buy an AA in humanities, now that's an achievable goal for a lil guy

4 years, with a long gap in the middle to record platinum albums and tour the world, thank you. And it's a BA. Don't be jealous. Just because I'm smarter than you doesn't mean you can't achieve something someday.

[Geist]

10 years to buy an AA in humanities, now that's an achievable goal for a lil guy

4 years, with a long gap in the middle to record platinum albums and tour the world, thank you. And it's a BA. Don't be jealous. Just because I'm smarter than you doesn't mean you can't achieve something someday.

Whatever you need to tell yourself lil guy

[CHEEZY17]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

[Geist]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

You couldn't cut butter with your wit, dreg

[Deathproof]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

[Animal]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

I will give it a go.

Your question was "prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?"

My answer: "the right to marry the person that they wanted to marry?"

[Deathproof]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

I will give it a go.

Your question was "prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?"

My answer: "the right to marry the person that they wanted to marry?"

And there you have it. They actually DID have the right to marry the person they wanted to marry -- so long as that person was of the opposite gender.
Normal people ALSO had the right to marry someone the wanted to marry, so long as that person was of the opposite gender.

Now, admittedly, gays did not have the right to marry someone of the same gender. BUT, normal people also did not have the right to marry people of the same gender.

Everybody's rights were equal. It was never an equal rights issue.

[Animal]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

I will give it a go.

Your question was "prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?"

My answer: "the right to marry the person that they wanted to marry?"

And there you have it. They actually DID have the right to marry the person they wanted to marry -- so long as that person was of the opposite gender.
Normal people ALSO had the right to marry someone the wanted to marry, so long as that person was of the opposite gender.

Now, admittedly, gays did not have the right to marry someone of the same gender. BUT, normal people also did not have the right to marry people of the same gender.

Everybody's rights were equal. It was never an equal rights issue.

But I think you see that the point is when you consider that "normal" people could marry who they wanted and gay people could not. That is what changed. And my understanding of that point has nothing to do with my views on gay marriage.

[Geist]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

I will give it a go.

Your question was "prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?"

My answer: "the right to marry the person that they wanted to marry?"

And there you have it. They actually DID have the right to marry the person they wanted to marry -- so long as that person was of the opposite gender.
Normal people ALSO had the right to marry someone the wanted to marry, so long as that person was of the opposite gender.

Now, admittedly, gays did not have the right to marry someone of the same gender. BUT, normal people also did not have the right to marry people of the same gender.

Everybody's rights were equal. It was never an equal rights issue.

People who know you irl laugh at your stupidity behind your back. Let it sink in

[Deathproof]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

I will give it a go.

Your question was "prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?"

My answer: "the right to marry the person that they wanted to marry?"

And there you have it. They actually DID have the right to marry the person they wanted to marry -- so long as that person was of the opposite gender.
Normal people ALSO had the right to marry someone the wanted to marry, so long as that person was of the opposite gender.

Now, admittedly, gays did not have the right to marry someone of the same gender. BUT, normal people also did not have the right to marry people of the same gender.

Everybody's rights were equal. It was never an equal rights issue.

People who know you irl laugh at your stupidity behind your back. Let it sink in

They don't, because there's no stupidity. Unless you can somehow demonstrate how anything I said was incorrect?

[Deathproof]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

I will give it a go.

Your question was "prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?"

My answer: "the right to marry the person that they wanted to marry?"

And there you have it. They actually DID have the right to marry the person they wanted to marry -- so long as that person was of the opposite gender.
Normal people ALSO had the right to marry someone the wanted to marry, so long as that person was of the opposite gender.

Now, admittedly, gays did not have the right to marry someone of the same gender. BUT, normal people also did not have the right to marry people of the same gender.

Everybody's rights were equal. It was never an equal rights issue.

But I think you see that the point is when you consider that "normal" people could marry who they wanted and gay people could not. That is what changed. And my understanding of that point has nothing to do with my views on gay marriage.

Normal people could marry who they wanted within certain limitations. Gays were subject to the exact same limitations. Nobody had rights somebody else didn't have. Nobody lacked rights someone else had.

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm on favor of anyone being able to marry anyone of legal age. I have no issue with hays marrying each other. My only issue is the false portrayal of it as an equal rights issue.

[Geist]

Geist couldnt make it as a security guard. You gotta cut him some slack.

Well, he can't answer lay-up questions, so I bet you're right.

I will give it a go.

Your question was "prior to the nationwide legalization of gay marriage, what right did gays NOT have that normal people DID have?"

My answer: "the right to marry the person that they wanted to marry?"

And there you have it. They actually DID have the right to marry the person they wanted to marry -- so long as that person was of the opposite gender.
Normal people ALSO had the right to marry someone the wanted to marry, so long as that person was of the opposite gender.

Now, admittedly, gays did not have the right to marry someone of the same gender. BUT, normal people also did not have the right to marry people of the same gender.

Everybody's rights were equal. It was never an equal rights issue.

People who know you irl laugh at your stupidity behind your back. Let it sink in

They don't, because there's no stupidity. Unless you can somehow demonstrate how anything I said was incorrect?

Literally every time you leave, because you're a joke