Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study

[Antknot]

Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study

Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study

Excerpts:

The messenger RNA (mRNA) from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA, according to Swedish researchers at Lund University.

The researchers found that when the mRNA vaccine enters the human liver cells, it triggers the cell’s DNA, which is inside the nucleus, to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA.

The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and enters the cell’s cytoplasm, where it translates into LINE-1 protein. A segment of the protein called the open reading frame-1, or ORF-1, then goes back into the nucleus, where it attaches to the vaccine’s mRNA and reverse transcribes into spike DNA.

Reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, whereas the normal transcription process involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nucleus.

“In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the researchers wrote in the study, published in Current Issues of Molecular Biology. “BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure.”


BNT162b2 is another name for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that is marketed under the brand name Comirnaty.

The whole process occurred rapidly within six hours. The vaccine’s mRNA converting into DNA and being found inside the cell’s nucleus is something that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said would not happen.

“The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells,” the CDC said on its web page titled “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines.”

This is the first time that researchers have shown in vitro or inside a petri dish how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, and is what health experts and fact-checkers said for over a year couldn’t occur.

The CDC says that the “COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” claiming that all of the ingredients in both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines (administered in the United States) are discarded from the body once antibodies are produced. These vaccines deliver genetic material that instructs cells to begin making spike proteins found on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 to produce an immune response.

------------------

Autoimmune Disorders
The Swedish study also found spike proteins expressed on the surface of the liver cells that researchers say may be targeted by the immune system and possibly cause autoimmune hepatitis, as “there [have] been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 vaccination.”

The authors of the first reported case of a healthy 35-year-old female who developed autoimmune hepatitis a week after her first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine said that there is a possibility that “spike-directed antibodies induced by vaccination may also trigger autoimmune conditions in predisposed individuals” as it has been shown that “severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection are characterized by an autoinflammatory dysregulation that contributes to tissue damage,” which the virus’s spike protein appears to be responsible for.

--------------------

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Whether the findings of the study will occur in living organisms or if the DNA converted from the vaccine’s mRNA will integrate with the cell’s genome is unknown. The authors said more investigations are needed, including in whole living organisms such as animals, to better understand the potential effects of the mRNA vaccine.

“At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination,” the authors said.

[JackCoughsALot]

so we should vaccinate children and pregnant women, right? (/sarc)

[FSchmertz]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

[necronomous]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

He's not the source. He commented on the study. I'm not saying the study is right or wrong, but he didn't conduct the study, so him commenting on is irrelevant.

[Biker]

[Biker]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

You do understand he's just commenting on the study and is not affiliated with it, right?

[Animal]

that's exactly right.

[FSchmertz]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

You do understand he's just commenting on the study and is not affiliated with it, right?

Did they find someone else qualified to comment on the study, or did they just search for the usual inflammatory and discredited sources, and in doing so bring into question their reporting on this story?

[Biker]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

You do understand he's just commenting on the study and is not affiliated with it, right?

Did they find someone else qualified to comment on the study, or did they just search for the usual inflammatory and discredited sources, and in doing so bring into question their reporting on this story?

So which part of the study are you disputing?

[FSchmertz]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

You do understand he's just commenting on the study and is not affiliated with it, right?

Did they find someone else qualified to comment on the study, or did they just search for the usual inflammatory and discredited sources, and in doing so bring into question their reporting on this story?

So which part of the study are you disputing?

Not really qualified to comment on it, but the one they picked to comment on it is a discredited source. Why did they pick him I wonder? Did they have an agenda in reporting on this?

[Biker]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

You do understand he's just commenting on the study and is not affiliated with it, right?

Did they find someone else qualified to comment on the study, or did they just search for the usual inflammatory and discredited sources, and in doing so bring into question their reporting on this story?

So which part of the study are you disputing?

Not really qualified to comment on it, but the one they picked to comment on it is a discredited source. Why did they pick him I wonder? Did they have an agenda in reporting on this?

I'm guessing they chose him because pro-vaxx doctors are too scared to comment. We've seen what happens when medical professionals dare question the efficacy and safety of an experimental vaccine.

[Animal]

I found a guy that has a study showing that Bigfoot exists.

[FSchmertz]

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, wrote on Twitter that the Swedish study’s findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic disease.”

Peter Andrew McCullough (/məˈkʌlə/;[1] born December 29, 1962) is an American cardiologist.[2] He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.[3]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments.[4][5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

Um, does anyone from the Maggot side of things ever check sources?

McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.[10][11][5]

He's not the source. He commented on the study. I'm not saying the study is right or wrong, but he didn't conduct the study, so him commenting on is irrelevant.

I disagree. The "expert" they choose to comment on the study as part of their reporting is relevant to the story. Why did they chose him? How credible is he? Why didn't they find other experts also if they did their work (it took me three seconds) about his background. Does it indicate an agenda by the folks that wrote this article?

Folks need to check sources when reading this stuff.

[WarmBidetWater]

From the horse's mouth -> https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/articl ... -attention

[FSchmertz]

I found a guy that has a study showing that Bigfoot exists.

Hey, maybe it's true. Did any experts in bigfootology comment on the study? Were they also well-known experts on ancient aliens with wierd hair?

[Animal]

I found a guy that has a study showing that Bigfoot exists.

Hey, maybe it's true. Did any experts in bigfootology comment on the study? Were they also well-known experts on ancient aliens with wierd hair?

there was actually one expert that produced a study that proves Bigfoot exists. If I had my feed set up right i could probably find dozens more.

[Biker]

Animal still thinks this vaccine is awesome sauce

[FSchmertz]

From the horse's mouth -> https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/articl ... -attention

From your link

There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.

Though I'm interested to see if other scientists will comment, and will do the same as before in researching backgrounds

[Biker]

From the horse's mouth -> https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/articl ... -attention

From your link

There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.

Though I'm interested to see if other scientists will comment, and will do the same as before in researching backgrounds

You're missing the point. Critics of the vaccine (if you can call it that) have long stated that it impacts a persons DNA. Those people were considered fear mongers, anti-vaxxers, anti-science, and on and on. This study proves their suspicions were true

[Animal]

From the horse's mouth -> https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/articl ... -attention

From your link

There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.

Though I'm interested to see if other scientists will comment, and will do the same as before in researching backgrounds

You're missing the point. Critics of the vaccine (if you can call it that) have long stated that it impacts a persons DNA. Those people were considered fear mongers, anti-vaxxers, anti-science, and on and on. This study proves their suspicions were true

it proves the suspicions about them being fear mongers, anti-vaxxers, anti-science and on and on are true. I agree.

[WarmBidetWater]

From the horse's mouth -> https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/articl ... -attention

From your link

There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.

Though I'm interested to see if other scientists will comment, and will do the same as before in researching backgrounds

You're missing the point. Critics of the vaccine (if you can call it that) have long stated that it impacts a persons DNA. Those people were considered fear mongers, anti-vaxxers, anti-science, and on and on. This study proves their suspicions were true

No, this simply proves the results only apply to a single limited study:

These findings were observed in petri dishes under experimental conditions, but we do not yet know if the converted DNA is integrated into the cells' DNA in the genome - and if so, if it has any consequences.

[Biker]

From the horse's mouth -> https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/articl ... -attention

From your link

There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.

Though I'm interested to see if other scientists will comment, and will do the same as before in researching backgrounds

You're missing the point. Critics of the vaccine (if you can call it that) have long stated that it impacts a persons DNA. Those people were considered fear mongers, anti-vaxxers, anti-science, and on and on. This study proves their suspicions were true

No, this simply proves the results only apply to a single limited study:

These findings were observed in petri dishes under experimental conditions, but we do not yet know if the converted DNA is integrated into the cells' DNA in the genome - and if so, if it has any consequences.

Sure, hide behind that. There are plenty of vaccinated dead that we can experiment on

[WarmBidetWater]

From the horse's mouth -> https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/articl ... -attention

From your link

There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.

Though I'm interested to see if other scientists will comment, and will do the same as before in researching backgrounds

You're missing the point. Critics of the vaccine (if you can call it that) have long stated that it impacts a persons DNA. Those people were considered fear mongers, anti-vaxxers, anti-science, and on and on. This study proves their suspicions were true

No, this simply proves the results only apply to a single limited study:

These findings were observed in petri dishes under experimental conditions, but we do not yet know if the converted DNA is integrated into the cells' DNA in the genome - and if so, if it has any consequences.

Sure, hide behind that. There are plenty of vaccinated dead that we can experiment on

[Animal]

biker and his group can't ever skip an opportunity to prove how they are nincompoops.

[Biker]

Working exactly as planned!