Page 1 of 1

Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:08 pm
by Biker
And before the knee jerkers chime in, yes, I believe Islamic schools deserve the same treatment as Chirstian and Jew ones

Supreme Court rules Maine tuition program violates First Amendment for excluding religious schools

The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Carson v. Makin


The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Tuesday that a Maine tuition assistance program violated the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause for excluding religious schools from eligibility.

The program provides tuition assistance for students without a local public school to attend private institutions – as long as the funding is not used for religious or "sectarian" teaching.

"Maine’s ‘nonsectarian’ requirement for its otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the court's opinion in the case of Carson v. Maykin. "Regardless of how the benefit and restriction are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise."

Roberts stated that with Maine providing the benefit of tuition assistance, they cannot condition those benefits in a way that "effectively penalizes the free exercise of religion."

Religious schools were allowed under the program before 1981, but then Maine adopted its "non-sectarian" requirement, citing the First Amendment. Roberts noted that this addition was made after Maine’s attorney general determined that funding private religious schools would violate the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. The Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that a program where private citizens made the decision as to where the money was going would not violate the clause.

The Supreme Court made that same determination on Tuesday.

"[A] neutral benefit program in which public funds flow to religious organizations through the independent choices of private benefit recipients does not offend the Establishment Clause," Roberts wrote.

A lower court ruling in Maine's favor had said that the real benefit was not tuition assistance, but the provision of the "rough equivalent of the public school education that Maine may permissible require to be secular."

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm
by CentralTexasCrude
I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
by Deathproof
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
by saltydog
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:05 pm
by CentralTexasCrude
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:07 pm
by saltydog
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:05 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.
I know what I said.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:11 pm
by Animal
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:05 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.
* 4 terms.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm
by CentralTexasCrude
Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:11 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:05 pm
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
Don't lump me in with his opinions- I have my own. I totally agree with him about RVG but the whole court packing is never happening. FDR tried it back in the 1930's and probably the biggest stain of his 3 term Presidency. Of course, Liberals back then had scruples like putting Country before Party. Now- not so much.
* 4 terms.
3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:47 pm
by Animal
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:45 pm
by CentralTexasCrude
Eleanor was still a butch/Dyke. Just ask Who.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:49 pm
by Charliesheen
Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:47 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator
Does UJ take VENMO?

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:56 pm
by DiverTexas
Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:47 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator
$$$

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:29 am
by stonedmegman
Animal wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:47 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:22 pm 3 terms and dead in his mistresses arm at Hot Springs Ga starting his 4th. If you've ever seen photos of his butch wife Eleanor, probably see why 3 is more appropriate.
I like to think of this place as another wikipedia. So let's go with 4 terms to stay consistent with the facts. Thanks.

We ask you, humbly, to help.
We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend You Gee Are's independence.

We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads You Gee Are gave just a little, we could keep You Gee Are thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask.

When we made You Gee Are a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if You Gee Are were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world.

You Gee Are is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of You Gee Are is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information.

We know that most people will ignore this message. But if You Gee Are is useful to you, please consider making a donation of or whatever you can to protect and sustain You Gee Are.

Thanks,

Animal
You Gee Are Moderator
TL:DR

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am
by saltydog
Any objections taxing churches?

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
by Who
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:27 am
by Animal
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:16 am
by Deathproof
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
I've always been of the opinion that churches absolutely should pay taxes. But so should Jewish temples and whatever the muslims call their terrorist training centers. There's no legitimate reason for any of them to be tax-exempt.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:18 am
by Deathproof
saltydog wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:50 pm
Deathproof wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:43 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:34 pm I hope the Liberal wing of SCOTUS gets really really used to being on the losing side 6-3 for the next 20 years. Trump flipped almost 1/3 the Court with young Conservative justices in only 4 years. It's the main reason I voted for him in 2016 knowing what Cackles would do with the same opportunity. Disaster averted.
Don't get too comfortable. You know liberals: when they can't win (like the 2020 election), they change the rules. Don't put it past them to add 4 more seats and install more liberal activists as justices. Four more carbon copies of that evil, corrupt old cunt Ruth Vader Ginsburg, may she rot in hell.
Wonderful representation of humanity you two.
That's the thing: we are. Conservatives are better people than your crowd. I get that that's hard for you to admit, what with ingrained, misguided, unearned sense of moral superiority you liberals like to assume, but its a fact. You aren't the good guys.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 8:09 am
by CHEEZY17
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Absolutely tax them. I could see at a lower rate though and if they want to get political then they can pay a regular rate like the rest of us.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:42 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Roe v. Wade overturned

Another "Major win for choice!", Biker?

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:49 pm
by Who
Animal wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:27 am
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?
Like Republicans pay taxes :lol:

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:35 pm
by Biker
Who wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:49 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:27 am
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?
Like Republicans pay taxes :lol:
Shall we list all the high profile Democrats that were charged with tax evasion over the years vs GOP, or nah?

Dumbfuck

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:23 pm
by necronomous
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
As if the country would work if 85% of the tax payers stopped paying taxes.

Re: Major win for choice!

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 9:05 pm
by Who
Biker wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 3:35 pm
Who wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 1:49 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:27 am
Who wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:53 am
saltydog wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 12:41 am Any objections taxing churches?
Like Republicans pay taxes, :lol: :lol:
if we don't, then why is the platform of every democrat to raise taxes on republicans?
Like Republicans pay taxes :lol:
Shall we list all the high profile Democrats that were charged with tax evasion over the years vs GOP, or nah?

Dumbfuck
Sure have at it