Politicial post something for no reason

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul socialists to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison political cartoons gets a three-day vacation.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

Post Reply
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29223
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2376

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:39 pm If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.
Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.
and i have tried to explain this but your dumb brain can't get it. which proves your dumbness. I am going to try again.

Jan 6th. People were arrested and charged. None charged with insurrection. Conclusion = non of them committed the crime of insurrection.

Subpoenas. People were subpoenaed. They failed to respond to those subpoenas. Steve Bannon was charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Peter Navarro charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Conclusion = people were charged with crimes for failing to comply with subpoenas.

Now stop being so dumb.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2377

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:31 pm and i have tried to explain this but your dumb brain can't get it. which proves your dumbness. I am going to try again.
Didn't you learn the last time you led with accusations of dumb? Time for another lesson.
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:31 pm Jan 6th. People were arrested and charged. None charged with insurrection.
Thanks for admitting you're changing the argument. The actual argument is what was January 6, not what was charged. And it was explained to you then, but your dumb brain didn't get it. Charges are pled down all the time to lesser offenses, never changes what took place. So even with your own changed argument, reality ends up shooting you in the foot. Now how about you prove your actual claim of January 6 not being an insurrection, definition previously provided by both you and me? Don't go too dumb on me now, you felt brave enough to wade back in.
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:31 pm Subpoenas. People were subpoenaed. They failed to respond to those subpoenas. Steve Bannon was charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Peter Navarro charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Conclusion = people were charged with crimes for failing to comply with subpoenas.
Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs, Mo Brooks. Your flawed logic would have to apply to them as well. Did they or did they not defy their subpoenas?
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:31 pm Now stop being so dumb.
Stop projecting. It never works out for you.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8363
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2378

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:39 pm If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.
You're correct, I'm just retarded. I'm sorry. I'm trying to improve, but my stupidity won't let me. But you are 100 percent right.
I know
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2379

Post by dot »

necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:54 pm I still got nothin'
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8363
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2380

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:56 pm
necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:54 pm You're retarded
youre correct
I know
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2381

Post by dot »

necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:56 pm I still got nothin'
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29223
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2382

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:53 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:31 pm Subpoenas. People were subpoenaed. They failed to respond to those subpoenas. Steve Bannon was charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Peter Navarro charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Conclusion = people were charged with crimes for failing to comply with subpoenas.
Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs, Mo Brooks. Your flawed logic would have to apply to them as well. Did they or did they not defy their subpoenas?
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:31 pm Now stop being so dumb.
Stop projecting. It never works out for you.
So let's examine that. In terms of that list you gave, were any of them charged with anything after they defied their subpoena's? Were any of them arrested and charged with something else? A lesser crime? Anything?
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2383

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:11 pm So let's examine that. In terms of that list you gave, were any of them charged
Is there some reason you won't discuss the actual argument? Did you lose your nerve that fast? So how about instead of deflecting, you actually prove your claim that January 6 was not an insurrection? You have the definition already, the only thing missing is the work. See what I mean about leading with accusations of dumb? You can never follow through.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2384

Post by dot »

https://www.statesman.com/story/news/po ... 892850007/
San Marcos police investigating threatening flyers from 'Trump Klan'

Threatening, pro-Donald Trump flyers that invoke the Ku Klux Klan appeared on Kamala Harris campaign yard signs over the weekend in San Marcos, according to the city's Police Department.

"Greetings! YOU have been identified and are now in our National Database of miscreant Harris supporters," the flyers say. They are signed by "The Grand Dragon of Trump Klan #124," who also indicated they are based in San Marcos.

It's unclear whether the individual or group behind the flyers is affiliated with the KKK. "Grand dragon" is a leadership title that has been used by the white supremacist terrorist organization.

The San Marcos Police Department received at least five reports of such flyers and is actively investigating their origin, said department spokeswoman Nadine Cesak. Any suspects will be referred to the Hays County district attorney for prosecution, she said.

The main threat contained in the flyers: an extensive federal tax audit "once the magnificent Donald Trump assumes the presidency again." More ominously, the flyers say such a bureaucratic probe will come in lieu of "the hangman's noose of the old days."

Image

Cesak urged members of the public to report flyers to the Police Department's nonemergency line. They also should leave flyers intact, she said, noting that a law enforcement official would remove them.

She confirmed that this is the first voter intimidation incident the department has investigated this election cycle. The Hays County sheriff's office has not received reports of any such incidents, according to Deputy Mark Andrews, a spokesperson for the office.

But such incidents have become relatively common in Texas in recent years, according to data from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the civil rights nonprofit that tracks hate groups and crimes. Since 2018, the group has recorded more than 2,000 flyer-related incidents in Texas that target racial and ethnic minorities, political groups and LGBTQ+ people.

Last year, the law center exposed the leader of a Driftwood-based group that it said was behind nearly 80% of such flyers in 2022. So far, local law enforcement has no reason to believe the group is behind the San Marcos spate.

A senior research analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center, who requested anonymity out of personal safety concerns, described the flyers as "alarming" and said they are designed "to intimidate and let people know" that hate groups are nearby.

However, he said it's probably not an indicator of a major Klan presence in the area. Even as Texas has become a magnet for other hate groups, he said, it has seen a decrease in KKK activity since the group's nationwide resurgence in the 1920s.

“Be vigilant, be aware, but try not to panic," he said. "There are not that many of these guys as there are of us."

The FBI has told state and local law enforcement agencies to be on high alert for domestic extremists who could interfere with the election or inauguration and act violently toward candidates, elected officials, poll workers, journalists and judges overseeing election cases, an NBC News review of classified documents found.

The San Marcos flyers appeared days after a man assaulted a poll worker in southwest San Antonio after she asked him to remove a pro-Trump hat. Jesse Lutzenberger, 63, faces one charge of injury to an elderly person in connection with the assault.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8363
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2385

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:03 pm
necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:56 pm You're retarded
youre correct
I know
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2386

Post by dot »

necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:21 pm I still got nothin'
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29223
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2387

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:53 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:31 pm Subpoenas. People were subpoenaed. They failed to respond to those subpoenas. Steve Bannon was charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Peter Navarro charged with contempt for defying a subpoena. Conclusion = people were charged with crimes for failing to comply with subpoenas.
Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs, Mo Brooks. Your flawed logic would have to apply to them as well. Did they or did they not defy their subpoenas?

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:16 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:11 pm So let's examine that. In terms of that list you gave, were any of them charged
Is there some reason you won't discuss the actual argument? Did you lose your nerve that fast? So how about instead of deflecting, you actually prove your claim that January 6 was not an insurrection? You have the definition already, the only thing missing is the work. See what I mean about leading with accusations of dumb? You can never follow through.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I love when you get cornered and you have to pivot back to some stupid point you were trying to make about something else. Let's just stick to this topic that we were on. The one you can't answer because it blows up your entire case.

Of those people you listed, were any of them charged with anything after they defied their subpoena's? Were any of them arrested and charged with something else? A lesser crime? Anything?
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2388

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:49 pm :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I love when you get cornered and you have to pivot back to some stupid point you were trying to make about something else.
This isn't being cornered, this is not catering to deflection. Zero of what you want to talk about has to do with proving your claim of insurrection not being insurrection.
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:49 pm Let's just stick to this topic that we were on.
That's what I'm trying to get you to do. Changing the argument is what you're trying to do.
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:49 pm The one you can't answer because it blows up your entire case.
It doesn't. Your dumb brain already got shown that repeatedly, remember? Charges filed is not the argument, that's your shifting. Lack of charges filed doesn't change the fact that a crime was still committed as well. The actual argument remains what was the crime committed and your claim that insurrection is not insurrection.

You never learn, do you?
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 16321
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2389

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Why don't the FBI and DOJ agree with your assertion that the crime of insurrection occured?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29223
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2390

Post by Animal »

If a person's dumbness was measured like the size of planets, poor dot would be ROXs 42 Bb
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 8363
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2391

Post by necronomous »

dot wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:34 pm I still got nothin'
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2392

Post by dot »

CHEEZY17 wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:21 pm Image
Hack can't prove his claim, changes argument instead. Shocking.
Animal wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 10:32 pm If a person's dumbness was measured like the size of planets, poor dot would be ROXs 42 Bb
Yet another dodge. Seems your courage has a very short shelf life.
necronomous wrote: Tue Oct 29, 2024 11:57 pm I still got nothin'
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29223
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2393

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:55 pm Yet another dodge. Seems your courage has a very short shelf life.

explain to us all again how a list of half a dozen people that you think might have done something wrong but none were charged with anything at all, is the same thing as hundreds of people being arrested and charged with various things, none of which are insurrection?

I always get a huge kick out of hearing you tell that one. go ahead..

and then explain the part where you think any of this proves that the people not charged with insurrection actually were guilty of an insurrection.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2394

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:02 pm explain to us all again
Deflection and distraction yet again. The actual argument is what was January 6, you dispute the fact that it was an insurrection despite matching all criteria even by your own provided definition. The lack of charges filed for subpoenas defied does not and will not change the fact that the the crime was still committed being subpoenas defied, just like how the insurrection still stands as it was in fact an insurrection.
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:02 pm *irrelevant blathering*
Man up and prove your claim. It's been months. It's become readily apparent that none of you can back up your worthless excuses for defending a criminal. Whether that's about the January 6 insurrection, the connected attempt to usurp power in this country, the Trump job losses that exist, the Biden corruption that doesn't exist, the serial fraud crimes your dear leader committed, and so on, y'all got nothin'.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29223
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2395

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:21 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:02 pm explain to us all again
Deflection and distraction yet again. The actual argument is what was January 6, you dispute the fact that it was an insurrection despite matching all criteria even by your own provided definition. The lack of charges filed for subpoenas defied does not and will not change the fact that the the crime was still committed being subpoenas defied, just like how the insurrection still stands as it was in fact an insurrection.
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:02 pm *irrelevant blathering*
Man up and prove your claim. It's been months. It's become readily apparent that none of you can back up your worthless excuses for defending a criminal. Whether that's about the January 6 insurrection, the connected attempt to usurp power in this country, the Trump job losses that exist, the Biden corruption that doesn't exist, the serial fraud crimes your dear leader committed, and so on, y'all got nothin'.
1. What was Jan 6th? It was definitely not an insurrection as has been proved by the fact that out of the hundreds of people arrested, none were charged with an insurrection.
2. What does the lack of charges filed for subpoena defiance prove? It proves that no one thought it was a big enough deal to file charges. That's otherwise known as no one giving a fuck. Which is a common reaction to nothing burgers.
3. Try not to call Jan 6th an insurrection anymore. Its been proven time and again not to have been one of those. Thanks.
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 16321
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2396

Post by CHEEZY17 »

No one is "changing the argument" or "moving the goalposts" or whatever else you constantly vomit up to dodge your inability to answer basic questions.

The argument is whether or not the events of that day were an insurrection.

There is you saying it was on one side and then there is the Department of Justice and FBI on the other saying the opposite. Damn, tough call. :lol:

Why don't the FBI and DOJ agree with your assertion that the crime of insurrection occurred? Its a pretty simple question, retard. One that should be very easy for you to answer. Give it a shot.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2397

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:28 pm 1. What was Jan 6th? It was definitely not an insurrection as has been proved by the fact that out of the hundreds of people arrested, none were charged with an insurrection.
Changed argument detected. An insurrection is defined as a violent uprising against an authority or government. January 6 fits. Your task is to prove the definition wrong. You have yet to do so. Changing the argument, shifting the goalposts, that isn't gonna cut it. Do the work or admit you got nothin'.
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:28 pm 2. What does the lack of charges filed for subpoena defiance prove?
According to you, your logic would mean the crime didn't happen. That runs counter to reality and is objectively observable by anyone at a cursory glance. Your deflection and distraction is flawed and discarded as usual. Do the work or admit you got nothin'.
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:28 pm 3. Try not to call Jan 6th an insurrection anymore.
You couldn't prove your claim. You couldn't do the work, thus you got nothin'.
CHEEZY17 wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:29 pm No one is "changing the argument" or "moving the goalposts" or whatever else you constantly vomit up to dodge your inability to answer basic questions.
Guilty hack pipes up with his behavior identified. Not surprising.
CHEEZY17 wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:29 pm The argument is whether or not the events of that day were an insurrection.
And it is you, the cowardly partisan hack, that will never prove your claim that it was not. Changing the argument to charges filed does not and will not change the crime being committed. Hack couldn't do the work either, thus hack got nothin' but hack things.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 29223
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2398

Post by Animal »

dot wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:43 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:28 pm 1. What was Jan 6th? It was definitely not an insurrection as has been proved by the fact that out of the hundreds of people arrested, none were charged with an insurrection.
Changed argument detected. An insurrection is defined as a violent uprising against an authority or government. January 6 fits. Your task is to prove the definition wrong. You have yet to do so. Changing the argument, shifting the goalposts, that isn't gonna cut it. Do the work or admit you got nothin'.
Um. No, Jan 6th does not fit. Otherwise at least one of the hundreds of people they arrested for crimes that day would have been charged with that crime. The fact that none were, is THE proof. Which, ironically is the same proof that you are a fucking moron.
dot wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:43 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:28 pm 2. What does the lack of charges filed for subpoena defiance prove?
According to you, your logic would mean the crime didn't happen. That runs counter to reality and is objectively observable by anyone at a cursory glance. Your deflection and distraction is flawed and discarded as usual. Do the work or admit you got nothin'.
Okay, then it the crime didn't happen. I can agree to that.
dot wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:43 pm
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:28 pm 3. Try not to call Jan 6th an insurrection anymore.
You couldn't prove your claim. You couldn't do the work, thus you got nothin'.
Oh, but it has been proven. Even in this post it is proven. The fact that you won't accept the proof doesn't matter. All that proves is that you dumb.
User avatar
dot
Dodgin’ Ese
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2399

Post by dot »

Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:49 pm Um. No, Jan 6th does not fit. Otherwise at least one of the hundreds of people they arrested for crimes that day would have been charged
dot wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:43 pm Changed argument detected. An insurrection is defined as a violent uprising against an authority or government. January 6 fits.
Thanks for admitting you got nothin' by proceeding to demonstrate it in public. Rather than prove your assertion that January 6 was not an insurrection, you change the argument refusing to even address that reality. This reality.
Animal wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:49 pm *irrelevant blathering*
dot wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:21 pm Man up and prove your claim. It's been months. It's become readily apparent that none of you can back up your worthless excuses for defending a criminal. Whether that's about the January 6 insurrection, the connected attempt to usurp power in this country, the Trump job losses that exist, the Biden corruption that doesn't exist, the serial fraud crimes your dear leader committed, and so on, y'all got nothin'.
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 16321
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Politicial post something for no reason

#2400

Post by CHEEZY17 »

Once again, here is the phone number and website for you to contact the DOJ and tell them how they are wrong and that the events of that day really were an insurrection. Give them a call. I'm sure they'd love to hear all about your conclusion. :lol:

DOJ Phone number
1-202-514-2000
https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-department-of-justice
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
Post Reply