Hypocrisy defined

For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.

In memory of our lost political forum members. :cry:

Moderator: Biker

Post Reply
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Hypocrisy defined

#1

Post by saltydog »

The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 13083
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Hypocrisy defined

#2

Post by Biker »

He was simply to uphold Clinton's Defense of Marriage Act.
User avatar
necronomous
Official UJR Trolling Czar
Posts: 7939
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Hypocrisy defined

#3

Post by necronomous »

saltydog wrote: Thu Nov 17, 2022 5:05 pm
How fucking disingenuous can you get.
User avatar
peterosehaircut
No life apart from this stupid forum board
Posts: 1899
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:30 pm

Re: Hypocrisy defined

#4

Post by peterosehaircut »

The federal gov't has no business being involved in marriage.
User avatar
saltydog
Chief Biden Ballwasher
Posts: 5313
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:36 pm
Location: Western East Coast

Re: Hypocrisy defined

#5

Post by saltydog »

peterosehaircut wrote: Fri Nov 18, 2022 3:08 am The federal gov't has no business being involved in marriage.
:rockout:
The problem is not that there is evil in the world, the problem is that there is good. Because otherwise, who would care?
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 13083
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Hypocrisy defined

#6

Post by Biker »

saltydog wrote: Fri Nov 18, 2022 3:30 am
peterosehaircut wrote: Fri Nov 18, 2022 3:08 am The federal gov't has no business being involved in marriage.
:rockout:
Or abortion laws. I fucking love federalism :rockon:
User avatar
Biker
Official UJR Russian Asset
Posts: 13083
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm

Re: Hypocrisy defined

#7

Post by Biker »

Hypocrisy indeed
Democrats Sue to Block Election Recount in New Hampshire

By Alice Giordano

November 21, 2022 Updated: November 21, 2022

The New Hampshire Democrat Party has filed a lawsuit to stop a recount for a statehouse seat, arguing that the election results should stand, even if they are wrong.

In the lawsuit, which was filed on Nov. 18, the Democrats are seeking a permanent injunction against any further audits of the race results between Republican Larry Gange and Democrat Maxine Mosley for one of the New Hampshire House of Representatives seats in Manchester, the state’s largest city.

Democrats argue that state law prohibits any further audits of election results once the secretary of state declares a winner.

“At the conclusion of the recount, Democrat Maxine Mosley was declared the winner by the secretary of state. The secretary of state’s declaration of Mosley’s victory was posted on the secretary of state’s website,” the lawsuit states.

Republicans called the lawsuit a desperate move by the Democrats to overcome the Republicans’ one-seat hold over the 400-seat House that was born out of the midterm elections.

“If the split was wider than than the current 200 to 199 seat for the House, I doubt there would be a lawsuit,” Bill O”Brien, attorney for the New Hampshire Republican Party told The Epoch Times.

Democrats are already facing the loss of another seat with a recount for a statehouse seat where the candidates receives the same number of votes. If the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission can’t resolve the tie, a vote of the newly-seated Legislature will decide its outcome.

O’Brien, who is a former speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, said the secretary of state never declared a winner in the race, but instead only posted results prior to a discrepancy discovery when the secretary of state conducted an audit of the gubernatorial race in the same district.

Mosley called for the initial recount after election results showed Gagne had beat her by 23 votes.

The recount handed Mosley a one-vote lead. However, when Scanlan’s office conducted an audit of the gubernatorial results in the district, Republicans noticed the audit turned up 25 votes not included in the original tally in the Gagne and Mosley race.

When the discrepancy was pointed out, Scanlan agreed that more stupidity of the race needed to be conducted, a conclusion that drew criticism from the Democrats.

“It’s unfortunate that Secretary Scanlan is clearly ignoring New Hampshire election law, but we will do whatever it takes to protect the integrity of our elections,” Colin Booth, Communications Director for the New Hampshire Democratic Party said in a statement.

The Democratic Party cites two laws that they say make the declaration of election results by the Secretary of State final, “subject to only a limited basis of appeal” to the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission.

O’Brien said it would be unconstitutional for the votes to be counted regardless of any law the Democrats are making their argument under. “Even if the statute reads the way they think it does and even if the secretary of state announced the results and put a winner up on its website, voters still have the constitutional rights to have all their voters counted,” he said.
User avatar
CHEEZY17
Libertarian house cat
Posts: 14903
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:25 pm

Re: Hypocrisy defined

#8

Post by CHEEZY17 »

That's almost as bad as our Secretary of State suing to NOT have to remove dead peoples names from the voter rolls.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
Post Reply