Space stuff

All the news from the peanut gallery and where all the nasty trash talk fails miserably.
It can get NSFW-ish here: you have been warned!

Moderator: Animal

Post Reply
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#151

Post by Animal »

stonedmegman wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:03 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is United Launch Alliance.
Yeah, I know its a conglomerate. But who built the rocket? Do they build rockets, too? Nevermind, I guess they do build it. Its hard to keep up with so many people doing so much right now. For some reason I thought I read that it was a SpaceX rocket they were using.
User avatar
B-Tender
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:48 pm

Re: Space stuff

#152

Post by B-Tender »

Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#153

Post by Animal »

B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
User avatar
B-Tender
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:48 pm

Re: Space stuff

#154

Post by B-Tender »

Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:35 pm
B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
I read that there was a problem with the lunar lander not being oriented to the sun to charge its batteries. I'm not as up on that part of the mission. My son worked on the program for the Vulcan rocket, and he would update me with their progress.
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8389
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: Space stuff

#155

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:00 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:35 pm
B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
I read that there was a problem with the lunar lander not being oriented to the sun to charge its batteries. I'm not as up on that part of the mission. My son worked on the program for the Vulcan rocket, and he would update me with their progress.
Lander successfully separated from it's rocket. Once they fired up the propulsion system to take it to the Moon, it suffered a catastrophic fuel loss that doomed the mission.
User avatar
stonedmegman
In Search of vitamin T
Posts: 3537
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: Space stuff

#156

Post by stonedmegman »

B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:00 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:35 pm
B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
I read that there was a problem with the lunar lander not being oriented to the sun to charge its batteries. I'm not as up on that part of the mission. My son worked on the program for the Vulcan rocket, and he would update me with their progress.
Did he have an issue converting to Metric?
QANON IS JUST SCIENTOLOGY FOR HILLBILLIES
User avatar
B-Tender
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:48 pm

Re: Space stuff

#157

Post by B-Tender »

stonedmegman wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 7:29 pm
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:00 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:35 pm
B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
I read that there was a problem with the lunar lander not being oriented to the sun to charge its batteries. I'm not as up on that part of the mission. My son worked on the program for the Vulcan rocket, and he would update me with their progress.
Did he have an issue converting to Metric?
He kept telling me how many stones things weighed.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#158

Post by Animal »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:49 pm
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:00 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:35 pm
B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
I read that there was a problem with the lunar lander not being oriented to the sun to charge its batteries. I'm not as up on that part of the mission. My son worked on the program for the Vulcan rocket, and he would update me with their progress.
Lander successfully separated from it's rocket. Once they fired up the propulsion system to take it to the Moon, it suffered a catastrophic fuel loss that doomed the mission.
yep. this is now an orbiting piece of junk.
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8389
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: Space stuff

#159

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:45 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:49 pm
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:00 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:35 pm
B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm
Animal wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 pm was this a rocket built by SpaceX? Also, did they land the main rocket back on earth like the reusable Falcon 9 rockets?
ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
I read that there was a problem with the lunar lander not being oriented to the sun to charge its batteries. I'm not as up on that part of the mission. My son worked on the program for the Vulcan rocket, and he would update me with their progress.
Lander successfully separated from it's rocket. Once they fired up the propulsion system to take it to the Moon, it suffered a catastrophic fuel loss that doomed the mission.
yep. this is now an orbiting piece of junk.
Probably a fuel pump. Instead of just mixing gases whatever that's called.
User avatar
B-Tender
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:48 pm

Re: Space stuff

#160

Post by B-Tender »

The Navajos put a curse on it. They didn't wan the remains to go to the moon.
User avatar
stonedmegman
In Search of vitamin T
Posts: 3537
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: Space stuff

#161

Post by stonedmegman »

CentralTexasCrude wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 12:03 am
Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 11:45 pm
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:49 pm
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:00 pm
Animal wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:35 pm
B-Tender wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:47 pm

ULA is a joint business venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin. The rockets are not currently reusable. They are able to go to a higher orbit than the SpaceX rockets can. The military uses the higher orbits.
Houston, do we have a problem? I am reading that they have abandoned the mission to land on the moon because of some damage to the lunar lander?
I read that there was a problem with the lunar lander not being oriented to the sun to charge its batteries. I'm not as up on that part of the mission. My son worked on the program for the Vulcan rocket, and he would update me with their progress.
Lander successfully separated from it's rocket. Once they fired up the propulsion system to take it to the Moon, it suffered a catastrophic fuel loss that doomed the mission.
yep. this is now an orbiting piece of junk.
Probably a fuel pump. Instead of just mixing gases whatever that's called.
It as a fuel LEAK if you paid attention.

Image
QANON IS JUST SCIENTOLOGY FOR HILLBILLIES
User avatar
CentralTexasCrude
Pumpkin Muppet
Posts: 8389
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: In the middle of frickin everywhere's bad thoughts.

Re: Space stuff

#162

Post by CentralTexasCrude »

English- Do you speak it?
User avatar
stonedmegman
In Search of vitamin T
Posts: 3537
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: Space stuff

#163

Post by stonedmegman »

CTC is a rocket scientist. :lol:
QANON IS JUST SCIENTOLOGY FOR HILLBILLIES
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#164

Post by Animal »

from the looks of that body damage, I'm going to bet a woman was flying the controls when it happened.
User avatar
B-Tender
Christ, get a life already!
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:48 pm

Re: Space stuff

#165

Post by B-Tender »

Animal wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 2:11 am from the looks of that body damage, I'm going to bet a woman was flying the controls when it happened.
A woman from Florida at that.
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 13820
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Space stuff

#166

Post by Reservoir Dog »

stonedmegman wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 12:38 am CTC is a rocket scientist. :lol:
Remember when he said the Webb telescope is covered in lead. :lol:
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:00 am You both fucked up. You trusted me.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#167

Post by Animal »

This has some potential. The link says "20 hours until live feed starts".

Its the Japanese about to land on the moon. And it seems they are going to have live feeds going during the landing.



The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s Smart Lander for Investigating Moon, or SLIM, is expected to touch down on the lunar surface at 10:20 a.m. ET Friday. If successful, SLIM’s landing will mark Japan’s first time putting a robotic explorer on the moon’s surface — and make it the third country to achieve such a feat in the 21st century, and the fifth country to soft-land a spacecraft on the moon since the Soviet Luna 9 mission in 1966.

The spacecraft, also nicknamed the “Moon Sniper” for its precision technology, will begin its descent toward the lunar surface at 10 a.m. ET. The landing will be streamed live on YouTube in Japanese and English.

“The start of the deceleration to the landing on the Moon’s surface is expected to be a breathless, numbing 20 minutes of terror,” said Kenji Kushiki, the subproject manager of the SLIM mission, in a statement.

The small-scale exploration lander is designed to demonstrate a “pinpoint” landing at a specific location.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#168

Post by Animal »

i think its about 30 min before the "20 minutes of terror" begin.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#169

Post by Animal »

The SLIM has landed!
User avatar
Reservoir Dog
Ricky
Posts: 13820
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Space stuff

#170

Post by Reservoir Dog »

Was it terrifying?
CentralTexasCrude wrote: Tue Mar 30, 2021 2:00 am You both fucked up. You trusted me.
User avatar
stonedmegman
In Search of vitamin T
Posts: 3537
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2021 11:41 pm
Location: Looking for Dave

Re: Space stuff

#171

Post by stonedmegman »

I was so terrified I couldn't even watch.
QANON IS JUST SCIENTOLOGY FOR HILLBILLIES
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#172

Post by Animal »

Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:27 pm Was it terrifying?
I really thought they would have some kind of live feed camera set up that showed the entire approach from the space craft. But it was all just animated stuff. Very boring actually.

Its mind blowing that in 1969 we had televised cameras showing stuff as it happened and now in 2024 we have to use cartoons.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#173

Post by Animal »

they are sure waiting a long time to confirm that the landing was okay.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#174

Post by Animal »

soft landing was successful, in that they are getting data and communicating with the SLIM. HOWEVER............... the solar panels are not working so it is not generating power. That means they are operating it off of batteries and the amount of charge they had when it landed. So, unless they can get the solar panel working, its time is limited. I think they said that the two "robots" that move around the moon were detached successfully, but it will be a while before they get any data from them.
User avatar
Animal
The Great Pretender
Posts: 28239
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm

Re: Space stuff

#175

Post by Animal »

Okay, tomorrow, Feb 22, 2024, Thursday.

USA will attempt to soft land Odyssius on the moon.
Post Reply