Re: Theyre not coming for your guns....
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 3:41 pm
We'll never know what Willis was talking about.
UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
quote wrote:Red-flag law in Maryland led to gun seizures from 148 people in first three months
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md ... 9be0ecdf6d
By Ovetta Wiggins
Maryland courts have seized guns from 148 people in the three months since the state enacted a law designed to take weapons from people who are danger to themselves or others.
Four of the gun owners posed “significant threats” to schools, an official told state lawmakers Tuesday.
Montgomery County Sheriff Darren M. Popkin (D), who has helped train police officers across the state about the “red-flag” law, said he could not provide details about the gun seizures — including those that could have led to school shootings — because of a confidentiality rule.
But, Popkin told the House Judiciary Committee, “these orders . . . are saving lives.”
Maryland is one of at least nine states, including California, Connecticut and Delaware, that allow a relative, spouse, legal guardian or roommate to seek a court order to keep a person from possessing a gun.
Dozens of other states in the past two years have considered red-flag bills, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The D.C. Council approved a similar law last month.
Between Oct. 1, when the law took effect, and Dec. 31, Maryland courts received more than 302 requests to take guns from a person in “crisis,” Popkin said. Just under half of those individuals were ordered to turn over their guns and barred from possessing or buying a gun for a year.
Officials did not give a total for the number of guns taken.
Popkin said the average of 100 petitions a month is higher than the rate in other states that have enacted similar legislation.
“Today’s briefing should be extremely encouraging to the people of Maryland that we have enacted . . . something that has proven itself to work, has proven itself to save lives and proven itself to be constitutionally sufficient . . . to begin to curb the epidemic we have with gun violence,” said Del. Geraldine Valentino-Smith (D-Prince George’s), the bill’s lead sponsor.
Gee, can't imagine why he'd have been red flagged. He sounds like such a responsible gun owner.When officers began to serve him the order, Willis became irate and grabbed his gun.
One of the officers tried to take the gun from Willis, but instead Willis fired the gun.
Less than half of the people reported were ordered to turn over their guns. So it seems if you're not a raving lunatic and talk with the Police they don't automatically take your guns. Sounds pretty reasonable.quote wrote:Between Oct. 1, when the law took effect, and Dec. 31, Maryland courts received more than 302 requests to take guns from a person in “crisis,” Popkin said. Just under half of those individuals were ordered to turn over their guns and barred from possessing or buying a gun for a year.
Stop with that British type of talk.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:49 pmIt doesnt solve the problem of domestic violence, which this law is supposedly targeting. What about killy looking knives? Shouldnt they be confiscated too?stymiegreen wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:28 pmLess than half of the people reported were ordered to turn over their guns. So it seems if you're not a raving lunatic and talk with the Police they don't automatically take your guns. Sounds pretty reasonable.quote wrote:Between Oct. 1, when the law took effect, and Dec. 31, Maryland courts received more than 302 requests to take guns from a person in “crisis,” Popkin said. Just under half of those individuals were ordered to turn over their guns and barred from possessing or buying a gun for a year.
It says the law is designed to take guns away from people that are a danger to themselves or others. What part of that is it you have a problem with? Any law can be abused by someone with nefarious intent so that in and of itself doesn't outweigh the need for law enforcement to be able to step in and take guns away from someone who is on the verge of harming themselves or other people. If the police were called to intervene where a crazy person had a knife then yes...they'd take those away from the crazy person too.Biker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:49 pmIt doesnt solve the problem of domestic violence, which this law is supposedly targeting. What about killy looking knives? Shouldnt they be confiscated too?stymiegreen wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:28 pmLess than half of the people reported were ordered to turn over their guns. So it seems if you're not a raving lunatic and talk with the Police they don't automatically take your guns. Sounds pretty reasonable.quote wrote:Between Oct. 1, when the law took effect, and Dec. 31, Maryland courts received more than 302 requests to take guns from a person in “crisis,” Popkin said. Just under half of those individuals were ordered to turn over their guns and barred from possessing or buying a gun for a year.