Page 1 of 1

Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm
by Ricrude
No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.


Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:24 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Well, he has a good speechwriter.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:38 pm
by Biker
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:24 pm Well, he has a good speechwriter.
Yeah, because a guy that has written several books needs a speech writer

Moron

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
by Biker
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:41 pm
by Ricrude
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:24 pm Well, he has a good speechwriter.
No doubt...

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:41 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK
And what happens if he wins?

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:42 pm
by Ricrude
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK
I just may considering what I saw last night.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:55 pm
by fouts
JFK didn't leave a legacy 'of peace' he left us the being of the Viet Nam war for the next 10+ years,and the Bay of Pigs that also almost got us into a atomic show down with RU,he did bang marilyn so there's that. This guy is a master of describing our faults and problems and few solutions. We all know the problems already. His interview with Tucker was good,he does know his history no doubt. I'd never vote for him besides 3rd party candidates don't have a chance of getting elected-ever except in their minds.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:57 pm
by Biker
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:41 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK
And what happens if he wins?
We'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:59 pm
by fouts
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:41 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK
And what happens if he wins?
electoral college prevents ANY 3rd party wins-ever. voting 3rd party is just pissing your vote away.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:02 pm
by Biker
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:55 pm We all know the problems already. .
Do we though? I don't hear any other candidate talking about decoupling government/big business and getting banks out of the single family home business

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:04 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:57 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:41 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK
And what happens if he wins?
We'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats
It would never happen. Ever.
Even if he (somehow) won the Oval Office, he would have the entire Congress against him. They wouldn't give him an inch.
He would get nothing done.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:08 pm
by Animal
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:04 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:57 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:41 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK
And what happens if he wins?
We'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats
It would never happen. Ever.
Even if he (somehow) won the Oval Office, he would have the entire Congress against him. They wouldn't give him an inch.
He would get nothing done.
that's probably not a true statement. At least its not a confirmed statement. I would bet that congress would be much more inclined to give a "win" to a third party president than they would an opposing party president. You might actually see some cross-party bills and voting. I wouldn't be afraid to see how it works.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:19 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Animal wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:08 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:04 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:57 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:41 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:39 pm
Ricrude wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:02 pm No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
If youre serious about breaking our dysfunctional two party system, have the courage to vote RFK
And what happens if he wins?
We'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats
It would never happen. Ever.
Even if he (somehow) won the Oval Office, he would have the entire Congress against him. They wouldn't give him an inch.
He would get nothing done.
that's probably not a true statement. At least its not a confirmed statement. I would bet that congress would be much more inclined to give a "win" to a third party president than they would an opposing party president. You might actually see some cross-party bills and voting. I wouldn't be afraid to see how it works.
I live in a country that has more than 2 major political parties. Up here we know full well what it's like to have a coalition or minority government.
It is VERY hard for those poor slobs to get anything done when that happens.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:27 pm
by Animal
well its a moot point here, because no 3rd party candidate could ever win down here. The best they can do is change the outcome between the top two.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pm
by fouts
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:02 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:55 pm We all know the problems already. .
Do we though? I don't hear any other candidate talking about decoupling government/big business and getting banks out of the single family home business
Yes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:56 pm
by Biker
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:02 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:55 pm We all know the problems already. .
Do we though? I don't hear any other candidate talking about decoupling government/big business and getting banks out of the single family home business
Yes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
I love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democrat

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:05 pm
by fouts
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:56 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:02 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:55 pm We all know the problems already. .
Do we though? I don't hear any other candidate talking about decoupling government/big business and getting banks out of the single family home business
Yes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
I love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democrat
hummm ,neither. guess that was a backhanded compliment.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:08 pm
by Biker
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:05 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:56 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:02 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:55 pm We all know the problems already. .
Do we though? I don't hear any other candidate talking about decoupling government/big business and getting banks out of the single family home business
Yes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
I love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democrat
hummm ,neither. guess that was a backhanded compliment.
So you're neither a GOPer nor a Democrat, yet you refuse to vote for a third party candidate. Makes sense

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:08 pm
by Animal
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:05 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:56 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pm
Biker wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:02 pm
fouts wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:55 pm We all know the problems already. .
Do we though? I don't hear any other candidate talking about decoupling government/big business and getting banks out of the single family home business
Yes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
I love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democrat
hummm ,neither. guess that was a backhanded compliment.
if you don't like either party, then by definition you almost have to have a defeatist attitude. that's probably why people are so down on everything.

Re: Hard to argue against this...

Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:48 pm
by QillerDaemon
Reservoir Dog wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:24 pm Well, he has a good speechwriter.
Or just all the time in the world to get his selection of words in the right order.

Trump could use some of that...