Page 1 of 2

For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 5:54 am
by Who
I've still got it.

Pulling off my depends all by myself.

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm
by CHEEZY17
What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
by Who
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 5:15 pm
by QillerDaemon
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Well, Cheezy is all about the butts, ya know...

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
by Who
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:53 pm
by necronomous
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You don't know what the right, a fascist nor a communist is.

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:53 pm
by necronomous
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Ok Brandon

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 8:40 pm
by Who
necronomous wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:53 pm
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You don't know what the right, a fascist nor a communist is.
Ok

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 10:29 pm
by necronomous
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 8:40 pm
necronomous wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:53 pm
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You don't know what the right, a fascist nor a communist is.
Ok
Yes, I know

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 1:32 am
by CHEEZY17
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You mean like the entire board has been?
The people that you think are "fascists" believe in free speech from all parties (even those we disagree with), personal gun ownership, less government regulation and intrusion in daily lives, free markets and capitalism with minimal governmental intervention and maintain a general distrust of a ubiquitous governmental presence. In other words, the opposite of a fascist.
Take a hard look at the policies and goals of your boy and his party and then think about "fascism".

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:18 am
by Antknot
The Biden Administration’s Prisoner Swap With Russia Was Ridiculously Lopsided


It’s good news that three Americans have been released, but to achieve that the U.S. had to release actual Russian assassins and spies.


https://thefederalist.com/2024/08/02/th ... -lopsided/

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am
by Who
Antknot wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:18 am The Biden Administration’s Prisoner Swap With Russia Was Ridiculously Lopsided


It’s good news that three Americans have been released, but to achieve that the U.S. had to release actual Russian assassins and spies.


https://thefederalist.com/2024/08/02/th ... -lopsided/
Wow the federalist is unhappy, maybe bring it before the Supreme Court and they can send them back

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am
by Who
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 1:32 am
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You mean like the entire board has been?
The people that you think are "fascists" believe in free speech from all parties (even those we disagree with), personal gun ownership, less government regulation and intrusion in daily lives, free markets and capitalism with minimal governmental intervention and maintain a general distrust of a ubiquitous governmental presence. In other words, the opposite of a fascist.
Take a hard look at the policies and goals of your boy and his party and then think about "fascism".
What party do you support again?

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:07 am
by CHEEZY17
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 1:32 am
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:43 pm What, a 3 month supply of "Depends"?
Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You mean like the entire board has been?
The people that you think are "fascists" believe in free speech from all parties (even those we disagree with), personal gun ownership, less government regulation and intrusion in daily lives, free markets and capitalism with minimal governmental intervention and maintain a general distrust of a ubiquitous governmental presence. In other words, the opposite of a fascist.
Take a hard look at the policies and goals of your boy and his party and then think about "fascism".
What party do you support again?
I dont "support" any party as I think all the parties suck.
I generally vote R because they are closest to my beliefs but are far from realizing most of their promises.
You support the party that hates free speech and silences those it disagrees with, wants to eliminate the 2nd amendment, wants more government control over markets and business in general and larger governmental presence in all aspects of our lives.
The R party is far from perfect but your misunderstanding and ignorance of the policies and actions of the Democrat party while simultaneously calling R's "fascist" is comical.

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:47 am
by Who
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:07 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 1:32 am
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm

Boy that’s weird
Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You mean like the entire board has been?
The people that you think are "fascists" believe in free speech from all parties (even those we disagree with), personal gun ownership, less government regulation and intrusion in daily lives, free markets and capitalism with minimal governmental intervention and maintain a general distrust of a ubiquitous governmental presence. In other words, the opposite of a fascist.
Take a hard look at the policies and goals of your boy and his party and then think about "fascism".
What party do you support again?
I dont "support" any party as I think all the parties suck.
I generally vote R because they are closest to my beliefs but are far from realizing most of their promises.
You support the party that hates free speech and silences those it disagrees with, wants to eliminate the 2nd amendment, wants more government control over markets and business in general and larger governmental presence in all aspects of our lives.
The R party is far from perfect but your misunderstanding and ignorance of the policies and actions of the Democrat party while simultaneously calling R's "fascist" is comical.
I just want to preserve this

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:38 am
by CHEEZY17
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:47 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:07 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 1:32 am
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:39 pm

Gee... I wonder which rightie Mod edited your post? :scratchheadyellow:
Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You mean like the entire board has been?
The people that you think are "fascists" believe in free speech from all parties (even those we disagree with), personal gun ownership, less government regulation and intrusion in daily lives, free markets and capitalism with minimal governmental intervention and maintain a general distrust of a ubiquitous governmental presence. In other words, the opposite of a fascist.
Take a hard look at the policies and goals of your boy and his party and then think about "fascism".
What party do you support again?
I dont "support" any party as I think all the parties suck.
I generally vote R because they are closest to my beliefs but are far from realizing most of their promises.
You support the party that hates free speech and silences those it disagrees with, wants to eliminate the 2nd amendment, wants more government control over markets and business in general and larger governmental presence in all aspects of our lives.
The R party is far from perfect but your misunderstanding and ignorance of the policies and actions of the Democrat party while simultaneously calling R's "fascist" is comical.
I just want to preserve this
Cool. Now think about the actions your party faithful take and the policies and agenda your Democrat party tries to implement in relation to "fascism".

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:35 pm
by Who
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:38 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:47 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:07 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 1:32 am
Who wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 6:52 pm

Have you noticed the Fascists have been really quiet around here lately?
You mean like the entire board has been?
The people that you think are "fascists" believe in free speech from all parties (even those we disagree with), personal gun ownership, less government regulation and intrusion in daily lives, free markets and capitalism with minimal governmental intervention and maintain a general distrust of a ubiquitous governmental presence. In other words, the opposite of a fascist.
Take a hard look at the policies and goals of your boy and his party and then think about "fascism".
What party do you support again?
I dont "support" any party as I think all the parties suck.
I generally vote R because they are closest to my beliefs but are far from realizing most of their promises.
You support the party that hates free speech and silences those it disagrees with, wants to eliminate the 2nd amendment, wants more government control over markets and business in general and larger governmental presence in all aspects of our lives.
The R party is far from perfect but your misunderstanding and ignorance of the policies and actions of the Democrat party while simultaneously calling R's "fascist" is comical.
I just want to preserve this
Cool. Now think about the actions your party faithful take and the policies and agenda your Democrat party tries to implement in relation to "fascism".
I’m working on the freedom of speech thing you mentioned, which democratic governors have worked on banning books?

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:20 pm
by CHEEZY17
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:35 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:38 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:47 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:07 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 1:32 am

You mean like the entire board has been?
The people that you think are "fascists" believe in free speech from all parties (even those we disagree with), personal gun ownership, less government regulation and intrusion in daily lives, free markets and capitalism with minimal governmental intervention and maintain a general distrust of a ubiquitous governmental presence. In other words, the opposite of a fascist.
Take a hard look at the policies and goals of your boy and his party and then think about "fascism".
What party do you support again?
I dont "support" any party as I think all the parties suck.
I generally vote R because they are closest to my beliefs but are far from realizing most of their promises.
You support the party that hates free speech and silences those it disagrees with, wants to eliminate the 2nd amendment, wants more government control over markets and business in general and larger governmental presence in all aspects of our lives.
The R party is far from perfect but your misunderstanding and ignorance of the policies and actions of the Democrat party while simultaneously calling R's "fascist" is comical.
I just want to preserve this
Cool. Now think about the actions your party faithful take and the policies and agenda your Democrat party tries to implement in relation to "fascism".
I’m working on the freedom of speech thing you mentioned, which democratic governors have worked on banning books?
Youre working on the "freedom of speech thing"?
Thats weird because you dont mention how for years the Federal government under the Biden administration colluded with Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they didnt agree with. Its still happening today.
Instead you want to focus on some folks wanting to keep books that are inappropriate for young kids out of elementary schools. The books are still available elsewhere and are not illegal in any way. Why do you want young children to have access to inappropriate material in a school setting?

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 8:50 pm
by Biker
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:38 pm Boy that’s weird
Who got the talking points I see

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:01 pm
by Reservoir Dog
Who wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 5:54 am 46 has still got it.

Pulling off a prisoner exchange with the rights favourite Communist
Image

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:55 pm
by Who
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:20 pm
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:35 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:38 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:47 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:07 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 2:28 am

What party do you support again?
I dont "support" any party as I think all the parties suck.
I generally vote R because they are closest to my beliefs but are far from realizing most of their promises.
You support the party that hates free speech and silences those it disagrees with, wants to eliminate the 2nd amendment, wants more government control over markets and business in general and larger governmental presence in all aspects of our lives.
The R party is far from perfect but your misunderstanding and ignorance of the policies and actions of the Democrat party while simultaneously calling R's "fascist" is comical.
I just want to preserve this
Cool. Now think about the actions your party faithful take and the policies and agenda your Democrat party tries to implement in relation to "fascism".
I’m working on the freedom of speech thing you mentioned, which democratic governors have worked on banning books?
Youre working on the "freedom of speech thing"?
Thats weird because you dont mention how for years the Federal government under the Biden administration colluded with Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they didnt agree with. Its still happening today.
Instead you want to focus on some folks wanting to keep books that are inappropriate for young kids out of elementary schools. The books are still available elsewhere and are not illegal in any way. Why do you want young children to have access to inappropriate material in a school setting?
Classic literature is inappropriate? And you’re ok with banning books? Weird

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:19 am
by CHEEZY17
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:55 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:20 pm
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:35 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:38 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:47 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 3:07 am

I dont "support" any party as I think all the parties suck.
I generally vote R because they are closest to my beliefs but are far from realizing most of their promises.
You support the party that hates free speech and silences those it disagrees with, wants to eliminate the 2nd amendment, wants more government control over markets and business in general and larger governmental presence in all aspects of our lives.
The R party is far from perfect but your misunderstanding and ignorance of the policies and actions of the Democrat party while simultaneously calling R's "fascist" is comical.
I just want to preserve this
Cool. Now think about the actions your party faithful take and the policies and agenda your Democrat party tries to implement in relation to "fascism".
I’m working on the freedom of speech thing you mentioned, which democratic governors have worked on banning books?
Youre working on the "freedom of speech thing"?
Thats weird because you dont mention how for years the Federal government under the Biden administration colluded with Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they didnt agree with. Its still happening today.
Instead you want to focus on some folks wanting to keep books that are inappropriate for young kids out of elementary schools. The books are still available elsewhere and are not illegal in any way. Why do you want young children to have access to inappropriate material in a school setting?
Classic literature is inappropriate? And you’re ok with banning books? Weird
Dodge noted.
How come you have no comment for your boys administration conspiring on a national scale with social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they dont agree with?
Certainly literature should be age appropriate. Not all books are appropriate for all ages.
If youre asking if I, like most rational Americans, think that sexually explicit and graphic sexual material should NOT be easily available to elementary kids in their school library, then "Yes, of course." The question is why do you think it should be? Again, its all about being age appropriate.

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:41 am
by Who
CHEEZY17 wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:19 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:55 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:20 pm
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:35 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:38 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:47 am

I just want to preserve this
Cool. Now think about the actions your party faithful take and the policies and agenda your Democrat party tries to implement in relation to "fascism".
I’m working on the freedom of speech thing you mentioned, which democratic governors have worked on banning books?
Youre working on the "freedom of speech thing"?
Thats weird because you dont mention how for years the Federal government under the Biden administration colluded with Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they didnt agree with. Its still happening today.
Instead you want to focus on some folks wanting to keep books that are inappropriate for young kids out of elementary schools. The books are still available elsewhere and are not illegal in any way. Why do you want young children to have access to inappropriate material in a school setting?
Classic literature is inappropriate? And you’re ok with banning books? Weird
Dodge noted.
How come you have no comment for your boys administration conspiring on a national scale with social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they dont agree with?
Certainly literature should be age appropriate. Not all books are appropriate for all ages.
If youre asking if I, like most rational Americans, think that sexually explicit and graphic sexual material should NOT be easily available to elementary kids in their school library, then "Yes, of course." The question is why do you think it should be? Again, its all about being age appropriate.
So let’s go back to my original question, name one democratic governor that is banning books.

Re: For a corrupt senile old man

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:04 am
by CHEEZY17
Who wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:41 am
CHEEZY17 wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:19 am
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:55 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 6:20 pm
Who wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:35 pm
CHEEZY17 wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2024 10:38 am

Cool. Now think about the actions your party faithful take and the policies and agenda your Democrat party tries to implement in relation to "fascism".
I’m working on the freedom of speech thing you mentioned, which democratic governors have worked on banning books?
Youre working on the "freedom of speech thing"?
Thats weird because you dont mention how for years the Federal government under the Biden administration colluded with Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they didnt agree with. Its still happening today.
Instead you want to focus on some folks wanting to keep books that are inappropriate for young kids out of elementary schools. The books are still available elsewhere and are not illegal in any way. Why do you want young children to have access to inappropriate material in a school setting?
Classic literature is inappropriate? And you’re ok with banning books? Weird
Dodge noted.
How come you have no comment for your boys administration conspiring on a national scale with social media companies to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they dont agree with?
Certainly literature should be age appropriate. Not all books are appropriate for all ages.
If youre asking if I, like most rational Americans, think that sexually explicit and graphic sexual material should NOT be easily available to elementary kids in their school library, then "Yes, of course." The question is why do you think it should be? Again, its all about being age appropriate.
So let’s go back to my original question, name one democratic governor that is banning books.
Clearly youre going after DeSantis here while dodging the Biden administrations assault on free speech. I'm going to now address your DeSantis issue. You can then follow up with addressing the Biden administrations censorship. Your mistake is that much of the book "ban" controversy is at the hands of regular people. In other words normal people that are fighting to "ban" certain things. Thats much different than a governmental entity like your Biden administration working with social media to silence opinions it doesnt like. Governor DeSantis has actually tried to limit these activist folks from abusing the objection process. As a Florida resident you should know this but when you only get your information from left wing sources that are only interested in pushing the "OMG THEY WANT TO BAN WINNIE THE POOH!!!!!1" bullshit while leaving out the overwhelming majority of books that are targeted to be removed from schools (but still available elsewhere) are sexual in nature or inappropriate for school kids. Again, why do you think sexually explicit material is ok in elementary schools?
Governor Ron DeSantis Debunks Book Ban Hoax, Calls on Florida Legislature to Amend the Law to Prevent Abuse from Activists

https://www.flgov.com/2024/02/15/govern ... activists/

Myth #1

Myth 1: The Florida Department of Education bans books.
Truth 1: The Department does not ban books. Each school district is responsible for ensuring all the materials in their schools adhere to state education standards.

Myth #2

Myth 2: Every book written is age-appropriate and has literary value for children.
Truth 2: This is a lie. Books with pornographic and sexually explicit material do not belong in school libraries accessible to children.

Myth #3

Myth 3: Dictionaries and thesauruses have been removed from classrooms.
Truth 3: This is ridiculous. No district in Florida has removed any dictionaries or thesauruses.

The following is what youve been told to be upset about. Oh, the horror! :lol:

After the 2023 legislative session, Governor DeSantis signed House Bill 1069, which continued to strengthen Florida’s commitment to parental rights in education. The bill further outlined the process districts must create for parents and residents to have the ability to object to inappropriate materials in Florida classrooms. This process continues to give parents a voice and keeps our children from having access to sexually explicit materials.
The previous year, Governor DeSantis signed House Bill 1467 that requires school districts to provide transparency in the selection of instructional materials, including library and reading materials. This process protects children from indoctrination and gives parents the ability to see the materials their children have access to at school.

Now, how about the Biden administration working with social media companies on a national level to limit, censor or outright ban people and opinions they dont agree with? Which of these 2 examples is more egregious?