UJRefugees.net

A few less voters of the future.

Quote of the day from ABC News:

"I was scared because I’ve never been in a school shooting," he told ABC News.

WarmBidetWater wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:17 pm Quote of the day from ABC News:

"I was scared because I’ve never been in a school shooting," he told ABC News.

to be fair, its not until around the 3rd school shooting that you sort of start to warm up to the whole thing.

Animal wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:42 pm

WarmBidetWater wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:17 pm Quote of the day from ABC News:

"I was scared because I’ve never been in a school shooting," he told ABC News.

to be fair, its not until around the 3rd school shooting that you sort of start to warm up to the whole thing.

And another school shooting on Shit Joe's watch.

Hell, there was a school shooting my junior year. Gang related 1 injured. The day didn't even end early.

This case just reinforces the fact that our legal system is based on the fact that you can't do anything to stop a crime until that crime is committed.

Police interviewed this kid a year ago, along with his father, because of online threats the kid made about committing a school shooting. The kid denied making the threats and the father, although admitting there were guns in their house, assured police that the kid did not have access to them.

So, the police had no reason to do anything about it. sorry to bother you.

Precrime is not yet enforceable.

stonedmegman wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:56 pm Precrime is not yet enforceable.

they need to put that fucker's father in prison for 20 years for being a dumb ass.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:07 pm This case just reinforces the fact that our legal system is based on the fact that you can't do anything to stop a crime until that crime is committed.

Police interviewed this kid a year ago, along with his father, because of online threats the kid made about committing a school shooting. The kid denied making the threats and the father, although admitting there were guns in their house, assured police that the kid did not have access to them.

So, the police had no reason to do anything about it. sorry to bother you.

Why were the police not able to verify the online threats?

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:01 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:07 pm This case just reinforces the fact that our legal system is based on the fact that you can't do anything to stop a crime until that crime is committed.

Police interviewed this kid a year ago, along with his father, because of online threats the kid made about committing a school shooting. The kid denied making the threats and the father, although admitting there were guns in their house, assured police that the kid did not have access to them.

So, the police had no reason to do anything about it. sorry to bother you.

Why were the police not able to verify the online threats?

they didn't go into any details. it was a pretty short article. This isn't the exact same article, but similar

5 hr 35 min ago
Investigators said they couldn’t substantiate a 2023 tip about Georgia shooting suspect, records show
From CNN’s Curt Devine and Casey Tolan
Law enforcement officials said they closed an investigation into a school shooting threat last year involving the teenager accused of killing four people at a Georgia high school this week because a tip about the threat could not be substantiated, newly released public records show.

In May 2023, according to an investigation report obtained through a public records request, the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office received a tip from the FBI about a threat on the chat platform Discord to “shoot up a middle school tomorrow.”

The tip from the FBI referenced a Discord account created the previous month with an email address that the bureau had associated with Colt Gray, the suspect in Wednesday’s shooting. The tip included photo attachments with a profile name in Russian that translated to Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter. The FBI previously said in a statement Wednesday that the threat included photos of guns.

What authorities did at the time: Investigators wrote that they interviewed Colt and his father, Colin Gray, at their home in Jefferson, Georgia. Colt, who was 13 at the time, said “someone is accusing him of threatening to shoot up a school, stating that he would never say such a thing, even in a joking manner,” one of the investigators, Daniel Miller, Jr., wrote.

Colin Gray told investigators he had hunting rifles in the house, and that, “Colt is allowed to use them when supervised but does not have unfettered access to them.”

“Colt assured me that he never made any threats to shoot up any school,” Miller wrote. “I urged Colin to keep his firearms locked away, and advised him to keep Colt out of school until this matter could be resolved.”

The suspect’s father said that Colt had “had some problems” at a middle school in Jackson County, but had since moved to another school in the county and “it has gotten a lot better,” another reporting officer, Justin Elliott, wrote. Jackson County is next to Barrow County, where the shooting unfolded at Apalachee High School.

What investigators decided: Elliott wrote that the case would be cleared because “the allegation that Colt or Colin is the user behind the Discord account that made the threat cannot be substantiated.”

The Jackson County sheriff did not respond to an interview request from CNN about the 2023 investigation.

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:01 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:07 pm This case just reinforces the fact that our legal system is based on the fact that you can't do anything to stop a crime until that crime is committed.

Police interviewed this kid a year ago, along with his father, because of online threats the kid made about committing a school shooting. The kid denied making the threats and the father, although admitting there were guns in their house, assured police that the kid did not have access to them.

So, the police had no reason to do anything about it. sorry to bother you.

Why were the police not able to verify the online threats?

they could. but they just sent a couple of officers to follow up and blah blah blah. they didn't send some forensic internet specialist that could actually look into exactly who made the threats and where, etc. i get so sick of these cases where they had the person and then lazy follow up work just let's them slip right through.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:35 pm

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:01 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:07 pm This case just reinforces the fact that our legal system is based on the fact that you can't do anything to stop a crime until that crime is committed.

Police interviewed this kid a year ago, along with his father, because of online threats the kid made about committing a school shooting. The kid denied making the threats and the father, although admitting there were guns in their house, assured police that the kid did not have access to them.

So, the police had no reason to do anything about it. sorry to bother you.

Why were the police not able to verify the online threats?

they could. but they just sent a couple of officers to follow up and blah blah blah. they didn't send some forensic internet specialist that could actually look into exactly who made the threats and where, etc. i get so sick of these cases where they had the person and then lazy follow up work just let's them slip right through.

There was no inspection of the home to make sure the weapons were in a cabinet under lock and key, unloaded, and with trigger guards on them?

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:43 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:35 pm

Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:01 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:07 pm This case just reinforces the fact that our legal system is based on the fact that you can't do anything to stop a crime until that crime is committed.

Police interviewed this kid a year ago, along with his father, because of online threats the kid made about committing a school shooting. The kid denied making the threats and the father, although admitting there were guns in their house, assured police that the kid did not have access to them.

So, the police had no reason to do anything about it. sorry to bother you.

Why were the police not able to verify the online threats?

they could. but they just sent a couple of officers to follow up and blah blah blah. they didn't send some forensic internet specialist that could actually look into exactly who made the threats and where, etc. i get so sick of these cases where they had the person and then lazy follow up work just let's them slip right through.

There was no inspection of the home to make sure the weapons were in a cabinet under lock and key, unloaded, and with trigger guards on them?

beats me. but I will go one better. The father just confessed to buying his son THE gun that was used in the shooting as a Christmas present in 2023. AFTER the police visit.

that kid's father needs to be charged with murder.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:48 pm that kid's father needs to be charged with murder.

And he has.