UJRefugees.net

The clueless DEI pick to lead the FAA who couldn't answer a single question about aviation (thankfully rejected):



The clown he picked to be in charge of our nuclear waste:



The dude he picked to lead the Health Department:



The Defense Secretary focused on DEI in the military that went missing for a week and thought it was OK:



The Transportation Secretary that decided to take 4 months off during the nations largest supply chain crisis in history and implemented a focus on DEI in hiring:



The DEI hire that is widely regarded as the worst press secretary in history:

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:18 pm The DEI hire that is widely regarded as the worst press secretary in history:

I hear she is going to star in The Black Orphan Annie.

Animal wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 3:08 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:18 pm The DEI hire that is widely regarded as the worst press secretary in history:

I hear she is going to star in The Black Orphan Annie.

Hit song: The Pardons will come out tomorrow.

Animal wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 3:08 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:18 pm The DEI hire that is widely regarded as the worst press secretary in history:

I hear she is going to star in The Black Orphan Annie.

She made Obama's guy Axel-douche and her predecessor "circle-back" Peppermint Patty seem like legends. Trump 1.0 had a couple of nimrods, too.

You do know 46 is out?

This was funny thanks for the laugh

Who wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 10:03 pm You do know 46 is out?

This was funny thanks for the laugh

Yes, and now Trump nominees are going through the approval process. Is that difficult for you to understand? Have you turned on a TV in the last week?

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:30 pm

Who wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 10:03 pm You do know 46 is out?

This was funny thanks for the laugh

Yes, and now Trump nominees are going through the approval process. Is that difficult for you to understand? Have you turned on a TV in the last week?

I don’t care whom is nominated or appointed I only ask that they’re competent.
You on the other hand are more concerned with optics.

Who wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 6:07 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:30 pm

Who wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 10:03 pm You do know 46 is out?

This was funny thanks for the laugh

Yes, and now Trump nominees are going through the approval process. Is that difficult for you to understand? Have you turned on a TV in the last week?

I don’t care whom is nominated or appointed I only ask that they’re competent.
You on the other hand are more concerned with optics.

It’s Biden‘s administration’s focus on optics that got those people in. A luggage thief? an obese person for the head medical? A nominee for FAA that didn’t know anything about aircraft? Luckily he didn’t get in.


So yes, optics mattered to Biden’s administration.

Who wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 6:07 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:30 pm

Who wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 10:03 pm You do know 46 is out?

This was funny thanks for the laugh

Yes, and now Trump nominees are going through the approval process. Is that difficult for you to understand? Have you turned on a TV in the last week?

I don’t care whom is nominated or appointed I only ask that they’re competent.
You on the other hand are more concerned with optics.

Welcome to the conservative position where skin color and sexual orientation are irrelevant instead of a primary focus.

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:07 pm

Who wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 6:07 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:30 pm

Who wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 10:03 pm You do know 46 is out?

This was funny thanks for the laugh

Yes, and now Trump nominees are going through the approval process. Is that difficult for you to understand? Have you turned on a TV in the last week?

I don’t care whom is nominated or appointed I only ask that they’re competent.
You on the other hand are more concerned with optics.

Welcome to the conservative position where skin color and sexual orientation are irrelevant instead of a primary focus.

Just the opposite is true for the cons

Who wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 2:15 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:07 pm

Who wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 6:07 am

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:30 pm

Who wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 10:03 pm You do know 46 is out?

This was funny thanks for the laugh

Yes, and now Trump nominees are going through the approval process. Is that difficult for you to understand? Have you turned on a TV in the last week?

I don’t care whom is nominated or appointed I only ask that they’re competent.
You on the other hand are more concerned with optics.

Welcome to the conservative position where skin color and sexual orientation are irrelevant instead of a primary focus.

Just the opposite is true for the cons

Not really. With them it's all about how little they know and how much boot they'll lick. Ignorance and subservience are virtues.