UJRefugees.net

deported?

Can we change it to Who is a fag?

Blast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 1:01 pm Can we change it to Who is a fag?

You can start your own, butt hurt biker will thank you

Blast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 1:01 pm Can we change it to Who is a fag?

I thought that was Leftneck.

Homebrew wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 4:09 pm

Blast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 1:01 pm Can we change it to Who is a fag?

I thought that was Leftneck.

It was, but let's get a bit progressive. Change is good.

Blast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 1:01 pm Can we change it to Who is a fag?

Done

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 7:24 pm

Blast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 1:01 pm Can we change it to Who is a fag?

Done

I only pitch, I ain't catching, cause that's gay.

Blast wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 8:37 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 7:24 pm

Blast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 1:01 pm Can we change it to Who is a fag?

Done

I only pitch, I ain't catching, cause that's gay.

Have you posed for catcher in the rye?

Who wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 7:05 am

Blast wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 8:37 pm

Biker wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 7:24 pm

Blast wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 1:01 pm Can we change it to Who is a fag?

Done

I only pitch, I ain't catching, cause that's gay.

Have you posed for catcher in the rye?

Nope, I have posed as a pitcher on a nice grass covered mound.

Some sanity in the UK

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 12:50 pm Some sanity in the UK

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Dude your obsession is really weird

Who wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:56 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 12:50 pm Some sanity in the UK

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Dude your obsession is really weird

i'm not sure that linking a Supreme Court ruling qualifies as an obsession.

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:03 pm

Who wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:56 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 12:50 pm Some sanity in the UK

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Dude your obsession is really weird

i'm not sure that linking a Supreme Court ruling qualifies as an obsession.

Really? How many times does a subject need to be brought up to become an obsession?

Who wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:33 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:03 pm

Who wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:56 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 12:50 pm Some sanity in the UK

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Dude your obsession is really weird

i'm not sure that linking a Supreme Court ruling qualifies as an obsession.

Really? How many times does a subject need to be brought up to become an obsession?

There are US governors fighting to keep tranny 'women' in real womens sports. Tell us again, who is obsessed?

Biker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:34 pm

Who wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:33 pm

Animal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:03 pm

Who wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:56 pm

CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 12:50 pm Some sanity in the UK

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Dude your obsession is really weird

i'm not sure that linking a Supreme Court ruling qualifies as an obsession.

Really? How many times does a subject need to be brought up to become an obsession?

There are US governors fighting to keep tranny 'women' in real womens sports. Tell us again, who is obsessed?

You

[quote=Who post_id=330829 time=1744915666 user_id=163]
[quote=Biker post_id=330824 time=1744914898 user_id=52]
[quote=Who post_id=330822 time=1744914820 user_id=163]
[quote=Animal post_id=330820 time=1744909390 user_id=196]
[quote=Who post_id=330819 time=1744908994 user_id=163]
[quote=CHEEZY17 post_id=330800 time=1744894249 user_id=96]
Some sanity in the UK

[size=150]UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex[/size]
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
[/quote]

Dude your obsession is really weird
[/quote]

i'm not sure that linking a Supreme Court ruling qualifies as an obsession. :lol:
[/quote]

Really? How many times does a subject need to be brought up to become an obsession?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
[/quote]
There are US governors fighting to keep tranny 'women' in real womens sports. Tell us again, who is obsessed?
[/quote]

You
[/quote]

You know how invested he is in women's sports!

Geez I guess someone's going to have to fix this whole quote thing. My bad

disco.moon wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:24 am Geez I guess someone's going to have to fix this whole quote thing. My bad

Has your account been hacked?

WarmBidetWater wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 5:00 pm

disco.moon wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:24 am Geez I guess someone's going to have to fix this whole quote thing. My bad

Has your account been hacked?

I don't think so. I guess it's been awhile since someone different came around and kind of shook the dust off of this place. But everything's back to normal like you guys like it. I'll bounce for a while.