Cheezy's Very Own Conservative Echo Chamber!

[Who]

...and get republicans to pay for it.

Nope, Mexicans will pay for it

[FSchmertz]

...and get republicans to pay for it.

Nope, Mexicans will pay for it

If they have anything left over when they finish paying for the wall?

[B-Tender]

Kinda sums it up nicely doesn't it?

[Animal]

Democrats would never finish arguing over who got to be in the 100 line, why they weren't included, what was racist about how they selected the 100, etc.

[Stapes]

It's hilarious watching flumper twist himself in a knot over a meme.... taking it kind of personal.... Hitting too close to home? Lol

[Animal]

It's hilarious watching flumper twist himself in a knot over a meme.... taking it kind of personal.... Hitting too close to home? Lol

^ taking it too personal.

[CHEEZY17]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

[spudoc]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

[Animal]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

[CHEEZY17]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

[necronomous]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

You're a big ol bag of stupid aren't you.

[necronomous]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

Its why im a registered independent.

[Stapes]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

Its why im a registered independent.

You're a registered retard

[spudoc]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

[Animal]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

when you are dolling out money for programs, it doesn't matter if the people really need it or not. The money is taxed on the rich anyway, so who cares? As long as you can justify it by saying "but, but.....one person needed it". Then its worth it for the votes from the other 99.

[Stapes]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

when you are dolling out money for programs, it doesn't matter if the people really need it or not. The money is taxed on the rich anyway, so who cares? As long as you can justify it by saying "but, but.....one person needed it". Then its worth it for the votes from the other 99.

So tax payer money only comes from the rich? R U fucking serious?

[FSchmertz]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

Actually the whole point of this is to show the foolishness of both attitudes.

Taken to the extreme, liberal policies would make us run out of money and/or put everyone in the poor house. Money isn't limitless. Accepting many undeserving "deadbeats" to make sure all the deserving get benefits isn't a sustainable model.

But the extreme conservative policy can be Darwinian/Conscienceless. Accepting harm to many people deserving of aid so that a few "deadbeats" don't get undeserved benefits shouldn't be acceptable either.

I think it's obvious that somewhere in-between is the ideal. And trying to help as many as we can get "off the gubmint dole" as possible should be a big part of that.

[spudoc]

Fuckin A thats perfect and the faithful on both sides cant/wont admit the folly of each position.

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

Actually the whole point of this is to show the foolishness of both attitudes.

Taken to the extreme, liberal policies would make us run out of money and/or put everyone in the poor house. Money isn't limitless. Accepting many undeserving "deadbeats" to make sure all the deserving get benefits isn't a sustainable model.

But the extreme conservative policy can be Darwinian/Conscienceless. Accepting harm to many people deserving of aid so that a few "deadbeats" don't get undeserved benefits shouldn't be acceptable either.

I think it's obvious that somewhere in-between is the ideal. And trying to help as many as we can get "off the gubmint dole" as possible should be a big part of that.

So the democrats in this meme think everybody should be fed and that is somehow wrong?

[Cassandros]

Explain the folly of the democrats position here.

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

Actually the whole point of this is to show the foolishness of both attitudes.

Taken to the extreme, liberal policies would make us run out of money and/or put everyone in the poor house. Money isn't limitless. Accepting many undeserving "deadbeats" to make sure all the deserving get benefits isn't a sustainable model.

But the extreme conservative policy can be Darwinian/Conscienceless. Accepting harm to many people deserving of aid so that a few "deadbeats" don't get undeserved benefits shouldn't be acceptable either.

I think it's obvious that somewhere in-between is the ideal. And trying to help as many as we can get "off the gubmint dole" as possible should be a big part of that.

So the democrats in this meme think everybody should be fed and that is somehow wrong?

Actually... yes.

Read what FSchmertz said (that you just quoted) again.

It is a spot on assessment.

[CaptQuint]

U.S. government checks constituted 40% of farmers’ income in 2020: USDA

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-g ... 1609444429

[CaptQuint]

[Animal]

U.S. government checks constituted 40% of farmers’ income in 2020: USDA

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-g ... 1609444429

what's the point here? That farmers did okay?

[spudoc]

its not the least bit surprising that you can't see it.

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

Actually the whole point of this is to show the foolishness of both attitudes.

Taken to the extreme, liberal policies would make us run out of money and/or put everyone in the poor house. Money isn't limitless. Accepting many undeserving "deadbeats" to make sure all the deserving get benefits isn't a sustainable model.

But the extreme conservative policy can be Darwinian/Conscienceless. Accepting harm to many people deserving of aid so that a few "deadbeats" don't get undeserved benefits shouldn't be acceptable either.

I think it's obvious that somewhere in-between is the ideal. And trying to help as many as we can get "off the gubmint dole" as possible should be a big part of that.

So the democrats in this meme think everybody should be fed and that is somehow wrong?

Actually... yes.

Read what FSchmertz said (that you just quoted) again.

It is a spot on assessment.

Its idiotic. If we are to take each stance as the equal opposite (and that's what the meme is doing) then the republican side is reprehensible while the democrat side is just over generous. One side says there is a lack of food for one so feed everyone and one side says there is a lack of food for many but someone might game the system so fuck everybody and these are somehow moral equivalents?

[Burn1dwn]

U.S. government checks constituted 40% of farmers’ income in 2020: USDA

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/u-s-g ... 1609444429

what's the point here? That farmers did okay?

I don't know if it is why CQ posted it but Farmers did more than ok, they received 35 BILLION in relief for an "overblown pandemic" on top of their annual 12 BILLION in annual government assistance. I bet real Conservatives are livid.

[Animal]

"The faithful on both sides can't/won't see it"
Cue: spudoc

What is the folly?

Actually the whole point of this is to show the foolishness of both attitudes.

Taken to the extreme, liberal policies would make us run out of money and/or put everyone in the poor house. Money isn't limitless. Accepting many undeserving "deadbeats" to make sure all the deserving get benefits isn't a sustainable model.

But the extreme conservative policy can be Darwinian/Conscienceless. Accepting harm to many people deserving of aid so that a few "deadbeats" don't get undeserved benefits shouldn't be acceptable either.

I think it's obvious that somewhere in-between is the ideal. And trying to help as many as we can get "off the gubmint dole" as possible should be a big part of that.

So the democrats in this meme think everybody should be fed and that is somehow wrong?

Actually... yes.

Read what FSchmertz said (that you just quoted) again.

It is a spot on assessment.

Its idiotic. If we are to take each stance as the equal opposite (and that's what the meme is doing) then the republican side is reprehensible while the democrat side is just over generous. One side says there is a lack of food for one so feed everyone and one side says there is a lack of food for many but someone might game the system so fuck everybody and these are somehow moral equivalents?

and yet the democratic side is one we get bill after bill after bill after bill after bill. there is no end to their analogies for "starving". student loans, health care, school supplies, teacher supplies, child care, welfare benefits, reparations, food stamps, housing, etc, etc, etc....