More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Moderator: Biker
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Your inability to provide a direct answer is par for course for someone who is completely void of integrity.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
if the cops pulled my pickup over and searched it, they would think that i was planning a coup. but i was at the ranch this week-end and haven't unloaded anything.CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:05 am Police found a pickup truck full of bombs and guns near Capitol, feds say
https://nbc-2.com/news/national-world/2 ... -feds-say/
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Try reading my direct answer a few more times if you like. No point trying to talk to someone too dim to comprehend what I have already said. Let me know if you figure out how to read and we can proceed from there.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:42 am Your inability to provide a direct answer is par for course for someone who is completely void of integrity.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
And the question you are avoiding is:AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:50 amTry reading my direct answer a few more times if you like. No point trying to talk to someone too dim to comprehend what I have already said. Let me know if you figure out how to read and we can proceed from there.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:42 am Your inability to provide a direct answer is par for course for someone who is completely void of integrity.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
And how do you propose we do that here, "re-education" gulags as per that Bernie staffer Martin Weissgerber?
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:52 amAnd the question you are avoiding is:AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:50 amTry reading my direct answer a few more times if you like. No point trying to talk to someone too dim to comprehend what I have already said. Let me know if you figure out how to read and we can proceed from there.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:42 am Your inability to provide a direct answer is par for course for someone who is completely void of integrity.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
And how do you propose we do that here, "re-education" gulags as per that Bernie staffer Martin Weissgerber?
Already answered, you stupid lying traitor.I'd assume it means bringing a little reality into the lives of the retards who think the election was stolen and the Qanon storm is a' coming, you fucking traitor. They need educating.
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
So, "Yes" to gulag re-education camps.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:55 amCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:52 amAnd the question you are avoiding is:AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:50 amTry reading my direct answer a few more times if you like. No point trying to talk to someone too dim to comprehend what I have already said. Let me know if you figure out how to read and we can proceed from there.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:42 am Your inability to provide a direct answer is par for course for someone who is completely void of integrity.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
And how do you propose we do that here, "re-education" gulags as per that Bernie staffer Martin Weissgerber?Already answered, you stupid lying traitor.I'd assume it means bringing a little reality into the lives of the retards who think the election was stolen and the Qanon storm is a' coming, you fucking traitor. They need educating.
And you have the audacity to call me a traitor.
Wow..
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
No, I did not say that you stupid lying traitor.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:56 amSo, "Yes" to gulag re-education camps.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:55 amCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:52 amAnd the question you are avoiding is:AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:50 amTry reading my direct answer a few more times if you like. No point trying to talk to someone too dim to comprehend what I have already said. Let me know if you figure out how to read and we can proceed from there.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:42 am Your inability to provide a direct answer is par for course for someone who is completely void of integrity.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
And how do you propose we do that here, "re-education" gulags as per that Bernie staffer Martin Weissgerber?Already answered, you stupid lying traitor.I'd assume it means bringing a little reality into the lives of the retards who think the election was stolen and the Qanon storm is a' coming, you fucking traitor. They need educating.
And you have the audacity to call me a traitor.
Wow..
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Then how do you propose we 'bring a little reality' to these people?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:58 amNo, I did not say that you stupid lying traitor.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:56 amSo, "Yes" to gulag re-education camps.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:55 amCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:52 amAnd the question you are avoiding is:AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:50 amTry reading my direct answer a few more times if you like. No point trying to talk to someone too dim to comprehend what I have already said. Let me know if you figure out how to read and we can proceed from there.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:42 am Your inability to provide a direct answer is par for course for someone who is completely void of integrity.
And the fact that you continue to lie about it shows your lack of character as well.
Pathetic. Be better, loser.
And how do you propose we do that here, "re-education" gulags as per that Bernie staffer Martin Weissgerber?Already answered, you stupid lying traitor.I'd assume it means bringing a little reality into the lives of the retards who think the election was stolen and the Qanon storm is a' coming, you fucking traitor. They need educating.
And you have the audacity to call me a traitor.
Wow..
Unless you can offer some kind of answer, clearly its "re-education" gulags.
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Education, as I already said. That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:01 amThen how do you propose we 'bring a little reality' to these people?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:58 amNo, I did not say that you stupid lying traitor.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:56 amSo, "Yes" to gulag re-education camps.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:55 amCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:52 amAnd the question you are avoiding is:AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:50 am
Try reading my direct answer a few more times if you like. No point trying to talk to someone too dim to comprehend what I have already said. Let me know if you figure out how to read and we can proceed from there.
And how do you propose we do that here, "re-education" gulags as per that Bernie staffer Martin Weissgerber?Already answered, you stupid lying traitor.I'd assume it means bringing a little reality into the lives of the retards who think the election was stolen and the Qanon storm is a' coming, you fucking traitor. They need educating.
And you have the audacity to call me a traitor.
Wow..
Unless you can offer some kind of answer, clearly its "re-education" gulags.
It's worth the attempt, but basically I think these people, which includes you, are unreachable. Fortunately they are also a minority, so what is really needed are measures to end minority rule in your country. Sideline the cretins and let the sane rule. Eventually, they will die. Educate their children to be better.
If my answer was 're-education gulags' then I would say 're-education gulags' you tedious stupid lying cunt.
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
So censorship? How very British of you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:04 amEducation, as I already said. That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:01 amThen how do you propose we 'bring a little reality' to these people?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:58 amNo, I did not say that you stupid lying traitor.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:56 amSo, "Yes" to gulag re-education camps.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:55 amCassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:52 am
And the question you are avoiding is:
And how do you propose we do that here, "re-education" gulags as per that Bernie staffer Martin Weissgerber?Already answered, you stupid lying traitor.I'd assume it means bringing a little reality into the lives of the retards who think the election was stolen and the Qanon storm is a' coming, you fucking traitor. They need educating.
And you have the audacity to call me a traitor.
Wow..
Unless you can offer some kind of answer, clearly its "re-education" gulags.
It's worth the attempt, but basically I think these people, which includes you, are unreachable. Fortunately they are also a minority, so what is really needed are measures to end minority rule in your country. Sideline the cretins and let the sane rule. Eventually, they will die. Educate their children to be better.
If my answer was 're-education gulags' then I would say 're-education gulags' you tedious stupid lying cunt.
But at least you acknowledge these asshat extremist are the minority. (Or did I assume incorrectly and you are actually calling the entire republican party 'the minority'?)
Now if you could condemn Kliens comment to "cleanse" 75 million, we would actually be making some progress.
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Nope, didn't say censorship either, you stupid lying traitorous cunt. And it is as a simple matter of fact that the majority of republicans have believed the lies about a stolen election, while a majority of its elected officials at least pretend to. A majority of y'all are just retarded. It is a fact.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:20 amSo censorship? How very British of you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:04 amEducation, as I already said. That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:01 amThen how do you propose we 'bring a little reality' to these people?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:58 amNo, I did not say that you stupid lying traitor.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:56 amSo, "Yes" to gulag re-education camps.
And you have the audacity to call me a traitor.
Wow..
Unless you can offer some kind of answer, clearly its "re-education" gulags.
It's worth the attempt, but basically I think these people, which includes you, are unreachable. Fortunately they are also a minority, so what is really needed are measures to end minority rule in your country. Sideline the cretins and let the sane rule. Eventually, they will die. Educate their children to be better.
If my answer was 're-education gulags' then I would say 're-education gulags' you tedious stupid lying cunt.
But at least you acknowledge these asshat extremist are the minority. (Or did I assume incorrectly and you are actually calling the entire republican party 'the minority'?)
Now if you could condemn Kliens comment to "cleanse" 75 million, we would actually be making some progress.
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
You said, "That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol."AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:21 amNope, didn't say censorship either, you stupid lying traitorous cunt. And it is as a simple matter of fact that the majority of republicans have believed the lies about a stolen election, while a majority of its elected officials at least pretend to. A majority of y'all are just retarded. It is a fact.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:20 amSo censorship? How very British of you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:04 amEducation, as I already said. That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:01 amThen how do you propose we 'bring a little reality' to these people?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:58 amNo, I did not say that you stupid lying traitor.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:56 am
So, "Yes" to gulag re-education camps.
And you have the audacity to call me a traitor.
Wow..
Unless you can offer some kind of answer, clearly its "re-education" gulags.
It's worth the attempt, but basically I think these people, which includes you, are unreachable. Fortunately they are also a minority, so what is really needed are measures to end minority rule in your country. Sideline the cretins and let the sane rule. Eventually, they will die. Educate their children to be better.
If my answer was 're-education gulags' then I would say 're-education gulags' you tedious stupid lying cunt.
But at least you acknowledge these asshat extremist are the minority. (Or did I assume incorrectly and you are actually calling the entire republican party 'the minority'?)
Now if you could condemn Kliens comment to "cleanse" 75 million, we would actually be making some progress.
The only thing that these companies have done different since the 6th is censor people and drop platforms where speech has no regulation.
What would you call that, if not censorship?
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Look up what censorship means, you abject retard. They are private companies.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:30 amYou said, "That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol."AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:21 amNope, didn't say censorship either, you stupid lying traitorous cunt. And it is as a simple matter of fact that the majority of republicans have believed the lies about a stolen election, while a majority of its elected officials at least pretend to. A majority of y'all are just retarded. It is a fact.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:20 amSo censorship? How very British of you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:04 amEducation, as I already said. That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:01 amThen how do you propose we 'bring a little reality' to these people?
Unless you can offer some kind of answer, clearly its "re-education" gulags.
It's worth the attempt, but basically I think these people, which includes you, are unreachable. Fortunately they are also a minority, so what is really needed are measures to end minority rule in your country. Sideline the cretins and let the sane rule. Eventually, they will die. Educate their children to be better.
If my answer was 're-education gulags' then I would say 're-education gulags' you tedious stupid lying cunt.
But at least you acknowledge these asshat extremist are the minority. (Or did I assume incorrectly and you are actually calling the entire republican party 'the minority'?)
Now if you could condemn Kliens comment to "cleanse" 75 million, we would actually be making some progress.
The only thing that these companies have done different since the 6th is censor people and drop platforms where speech has no regulation.
What would you call that, if not censorship?
And again, you fucking traitor, twitter did not ban the traitor until he incited an armed attack on the Capitol building, you fucking TRAITOR.
- Cassandros
- Hamsterphile
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:38 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Are you so delusional to think only a government can censor people?AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:35 amLook up what censorship means, you abject retard. They are private companies.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:30 amYou said, "That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol."AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:21 amNope, didn't say censorship either, you stupid lying traitorous cunt. And it is as a simple matter of fact that the majority of republicans have believed the lies about a stolen election, while a majority of its elected officials at least pretend to. A majority of y'all are just retarded. It is a fact.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:20 amSo censorship? How very British of you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:04 amEducation, as I already said. That means private companies like twitter and facebook which is where these cretins get their info finally stepping up, which they are finally doing after your traitor president incited an attack on the Capitol.Cassandros wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:01 am
Then how do you propose we 'bring a little reality' to these people?
Unless you can offer some kind of answer, clearly its "re-education" gulags.
It's worth the attempt, but basically I think these people, which includes you, are unreachable. Fortunately they are also a minority, so what is really needed are measures to end minority rule in your country. Sideline the cretins and let the sane rule. Eventually, they will die. Educate their children to be better.
If my answer was 're-education gulags' then I would say 're-education gulags' you tedious stupid lying cunt.
But at least you acknowledge these asshat extremist are the minority. (Or did I assume incorrectly and you are actually calling the entire republican party 'the minority'?)
Now if you could condemn Kliens comment to "cleanse" 75 million, we would actually be making some progress.
The only thing that these companies have done different since the 6th is censor people and drop platforms where speech has no regulation.
What would you call that, if not censorship?
And again, you fucking traitor, twitter did not ban the traitor until he incited an armed attack on the Capitol building, you fucking TRAITOR.
Anyone who has the power, and proceeds to "...suppress speech, public communication, or other information, on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful..." is censoring.
As usual, you are spinning reality to push a narrative. Just because trump being banned for inciting a riot is reasonable; doesn't mean suddenly you should suppress the free speech of all republicans or shut down apps that allow people complete, unfettered free speech.
You know, I know it, we all know it. But can you admit it?
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither, the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great deal of both.” --Milton Friedman
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
actually a private company can be sued for defamation or slander or lots of other things. these companies have been given protection from that. and that is where the problem starts.
- dot
- Dodgin’ Ese
- Posts: 2014
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 11:25 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
So... “the problem” wasn’t the violent insurrection staging grounds nor was its users inciting and endorsing violence and murder. No, “the problem” is not being able to sue private companies for regulating sedition. You and Mr. Both Sides need to realize that no government did this to your traitorous brethren. They got TOS’d. The rest of you can still tweet to your heart’s delight as long as you follow the rules.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
They’ve been given protection from liability for slanderous statements made on their platforms, not statements they make on their own behalf.
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
They have been given protection from liability because they don't moderate, censor, or even slightly get involved in what someone might post. The protection was because those platforms were considered the bastion of free speech. Where the host in no way regulated what they said and therefore could not be liable for it. What they are doing now is forfeiting that protection in every sense. Where they can now be sued for child porn, slander, defamation, fraud, etc. You can't moderate the few, you have to moderate all or none.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
They routinely ban, block, or moderate content. You’re conflating two different concepts. Them not being held liable for third party content is a protection from liability in the courts. Internally, they have the right to limit what can be posted on their platforms, and they routinely take action to block content contrary to their terms of service. It’s not a free speech issue.Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:45 pmThey have been given protection from liability because they don't moderate, censor, or even slightly get involved in what someone might post. The protection was because those platforms were considered the bastion of free speech. Where the host in no way regulated what they said and therefore could not be liable for it. What they are doing now is forfeiting that protection in every sense. Where they can now be sued for child porn, slander, defamation, fraud, etc. You can't moderate the few, you have to moderate all or none.
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Yeah, its absolutely a free speech issue. read up on Section 230. "Section 230 is as important as the First Amendment to protecting free speech online, certainly here in the U.S.," says Emma Llanso, a free expression advocate at the Center for Democracy and Technology.Wut wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:58 pmThey routinely ban, block, or moderate content. You’re conflating two different concepts. Them not being held liable for third party content is a protection from liability in the courts. Internally, they have the right to limit what can be posted on their platforms, and they routinely take action to block content contrary to their terms of service. It’s not a free speech issue.Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:45 pmThey have been given protection from liability because they don't moderate, censor, or even slightly get involved in what someone might post. The protection was because those platforms were considered the bastion of free speech. Where the host in no way regulated what they said and therefore could not be liable for it. What they are doing now is forfeiting that protection in every sense. Where they can now be sued for child porn, slander, defamation, fraud, etc. You can't moderate the few, you have to moderate all or none.
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
What about the rest of what I said ?Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:13 pmYeah, its absolutely a free speech issue. read up on Section 230. "Section 230 is as important as the First Amendment to protecting free speech online, certainly here in the U.S.," says Emma Llanso, a free expression advocate at the Center for Democracy and Technology.Wut wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:58 pmThey routinely ban, block, or moderate content. You’re conflating two different concepts. Them not being held liable for third party content is a protection from liability in the courts. Internally, they have the right to limit what can be posted on their platforms, and they routinely take action to block content contrary to their terms of service. It’s not a free speech issue.Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:45 pmThey have been given protection from liability because they don't moderate, censor, or even slightly get involved in what someone might post. The protection was because those platforms were considered the bastion of free speech. Where the host in no way regulated what they said and therefore could not be liable for it. What they are doing now is forfeiting that protection in every sense. Where they can now be sued for child porn, slander, defamation, fraud, etc. You can't moderate the few, you have to moderate all or none.
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
Obviously I can't know every measure that they take. I can only compare the ones that I have seen. So, let's just do that.Wut wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:16 pmWhat about the rest of what I said ?Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:13 pmYeah, its absolutely a free speech issue. read up on Section 230. "Section 230 is as important as the First Amendment to protecting free speech online, certainly here in the U.S.," says Emma Llanso, a free expression advocate at the Center for Democracy and Technology.Wut wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:58 pmThey routinely ban, block, or moderate content. You’re conflating two different concepts. Them not being held liable for third party content is a protection from liability in the courts. Internally, they have the right to limit what can be posted on their platforms, and they routinely take action to block content contrary to their terms of service. It’s not a free speech issue.Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:45 pmThey have been given protection from liability because they don't moderate, censor, or even slightly get involved in what someone might post. The protection was because those platforms were considered the bastion of free speech. Where the host in no way regulated what they said and therefore could not be liable for it. What they are doing now is forfeiting that protection in every sense. Where they can now be sued for child porn, slander, defamation, fraud, etc. You can't moderate the few, you have to moderate all or none.
Did they ban or block or censor any posts that related to Trump colluding with Russia in an effort to throw the election in Trump's favor?
Did they ban or block or censor any posts that related to the Hunter Biden laptop?
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock
Re: More Violent Democrats (now cowardly violent)
I have no idea.Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:21 pmObviously I can't know every measure that they take. I can only compare the ones that I have seen. So, let's just do that.Wut wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:16 pmWhat about the rest of what I said ?Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:13 pmYeah, its absolutely a free speech issue. read up on Section 230. "Section 230 is as important as the First Amendment to protecting free speech online, certainly here in the U.S.," says Emma Llanso, a free expression advocate at the Center for Democracy and Technology.Wut wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:58 pmThey routinely ban, block, or moderate content. You’re conflating two different concepts. Them not being held liable for third party content is a protection from liability in the courts. Internally, they have the right to limit what can be posted on their platforms, and they routinely take action to block content contrary to their terms of service. It’s not a free speech issue.Animal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:45 pmThey have been given protection from liability because they don't moderate, censor, or even slightly get involved in what someone might post. The protection was because those platforms were considered the bastion of free speech. Where the host in no way regulated what they said and therefore could not be liable for it. What they are doing now is forfeiting that protection in every sense. Where they can now be sued for child porn, slander, defamation, fraud, etc. You can't moderate the few, you have to moderate all or none.
Did they ban or block or censor any posts that related to Trump colluding with Russia in an effort to throw the election in Trump's favor?
Did they ban or block or censor any posts that related to the Hunter Biden laptop?
wut?
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
- Wut
- Denmarkian Citizen
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:11 pm
- Location: On a rock