Hard to argue against this...
Moderator: Biker
- Ricrude
- No life apart from this stupid forum board
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2023 1:41 pm
- Location: Peeking in your window
- Interests: Drinking, gambling, running around with the wrong crowd, pranks...typical UJ stuff.
- Occupation: In-House Deity
Hard to argue against this...
No one is perfect but to my way of thinking...he's pretty much spot on.
It is absolutely amazing that some people survive walking out of their homes...fo reelz!
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 13873
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
Re: Hard to argue against this...
Yeah, because a guy that has written several books needs a speech writer
Moron
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
- Ricrude
- No life apart from this stupid forum board
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2023 1:41 pm
- Location: Peeking in your window
- Interests: Drinking, gambling, running around with the wrong crowd, pranks...typical UJ stuff.
- Occupation: In-House Deity
Re: Hard to argue against this...
No doubt...
It is absolutely amazing that some people survive walking out of their homes...fo reelz!
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 13873
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
- Ricrude
- No life apart from this stupid forum board
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2023 1:41 pm
- Location: Peeking in your window
- Interests: Drinking, gambling, running around with the wrong crowd, pranks...typical UJ stuff.
- Occupation: In-House Deity
Re: Hard to argue against this...
I just may considering what I saw last night.
It is absolutely amazing that some people survive walking out of their homes...fo reelz!
- fouts
- Forum God
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:39 pm
- Location: n.palm fla
Re: Hard to argue against this...
JFK didn't leave a legacy 'of peace' he left us the being of the Viet Nam war for the next 10+ years,and the Bay of Pigs that also almost got us into a atomic show down with RU,he did bang marilyn so there's that. This guy is a master of describing our faults and problems and few solutions. We all know the problems already. His interview with Tucker was good,he does know his history no doubt. I'd never vote for him besides 3rd party candidates don't have a chance of getting elected-ever except in their minds.
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
Re: Hard to argue against this...
We'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats
- fouts
- Forum God
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:39 pm
- Location: n.palm fla
Re: Hard to argue against this...
electoral college prevents ANY 3rd party wins-ever. voting 3rd party is just pissing your vote away.
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 13873
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: Hard to argue against this...
It would never happen. Ever.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:57 pmWe'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats
Even if he (somehow) won the Oval Office, he would have the entire Congress against him. They wouldn't give him an inch.
He would get nothing done.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: Hard to argue against this...
that's probably not a true statement. At least its not a confirmed statement. I would bet that congress would be much more inclined to give a "win" to a third party president than they would an opposing party president. You might actually see some cross-party bills and voting. I wouldn't be afraid to see how it works.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:04 pmIt would never happen. Ever.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:57 pmWe'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats
Even if he (somehow) won the Oval Office, he would have the entire Congress against him. They wouldn't give him an inch.
He would get nothing done.
- Reservoir Dog
- Ricky
- Posts: 13873
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: Hard to argue against this...
I live in a country that has more than 2 major political parties. Up here we know full well what it's like to have a coalition or minority government.Animal wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:08 pmthat's probably not a true statement. At least its not a confirmed statement. I would bet that congress would be much more inclined to give a "win" to a third party president than they would an opposing party president. You might actually see some cross-party bills and voting. I wouldn't be afraid to see how it works.Reservoir Dog wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:04 pmIt would never happen. Ever.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 3:57 pmWe'll all be better off. Hopefully, he will fulfill his biggest promise of decoupling big business and government bureaucrats
Even if he (somehow) won the Oval Office, he would have the entire Congress against him. They wouldn't give him an inch.
He would get nothing done.
It is VERY hard for those poor slobs to get anything done when that happens.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: Hard to argue against this...
well its a moot point here, because no 3rd party candidate could ever win down here. The best they can do is change the outcome between the top two.
- fouts
- Forum God
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:39 pm
- Location: n.palm fla
Re: Hard to argue against this...
Yes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
Re: Hard to argue against this...
I love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democratfouts wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pmYes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
- fouts
- Forum God
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:39 pm
- Location: n.palm fla
Re: Hard to argue against this...
hummm ,neither. guess that was a backhanded compliment.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:56 pmI love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democratfouts wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pmYes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
- Biker
- Official UJR Russian Asset
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:22 pm
Re: Hard to argue against this...
So you're neither a GOPer nor a Democrat, yet you refuse to vote for a third party candidate. Makes sensefouts wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:05 pmhummm ,neither. guess that was a backhanded compliment.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:56 pmI love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democratfouts wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pmYes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
- Animal
- The Great Pretender
- Posts: 28360
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:18 pm
Re: Hard to argue against this...
if you don't like either party, then by definition you almost have to have a defeatist attitude. that's probably why people are so down on everything.fouts wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 5:05 pmhummm ,neither. guess that was a backhanded compliment.Biker wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:56 pmI love defeatist attitudes. You must be a Democratfouts wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 4:55 pmYes we know, either directly or indirectly ,how this government is more concerned about using new 'pronouns' than how to lower food prices.The list is endless. He talks whats wrong and little solutions,big business is here to stay and tied to the feds hip like Siamese twins,separating them will kill one or both.
- QillerDaemon
- Crazy Old Cat Lady
- Posts: 4083
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:35 pm
- Location: Beautiful downtown OrloVista FL
- Interests: キラーデモン
- Occupation: Router/Switch Jockey.
Re: Hard to argue against this...
Or just all the time in the world to get his selection of words in the right order.
Trump could use some of that...
If you can't be a good example, you can still serve as a horrible warning.
“All mushrooms are edible. Some even more than once!”
これを グーグル 翻訳に登録してくれておめでとう、バカ。
“All mushrooms are edible. Some even more than once!”
これを グーグル 翻訳に登録してくれておめでとう、バカ。