US buying Greenland

[Tuesday]

You believed Hillary's emails too didn't you? Was there a little red "c" in the corner or not, Mark?

[dot]

Again, none were charged with it. Nice try though.

The fallacy in your logic is still clear and on the record. Well done, Red, you're still as intelligently bankrupt as ever.

If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.

Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.

[Tuesday]

Brainwashed zombies will say its fake

[necronomous]

Again, none were charged with it. Nice try though.

The fallacy in your logic is still clear and on the record. Well done, Red, you're still as intelligently bankrupt as ever.

If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.

Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.

How is following the law a fallacy? Neat try though.

[necronomous]

Brainwashed zombies will say its fake

Hey look a news article that proves fuck all.

[Tuesday]

Its not easy to admit youre duped easily and often. I forgot to add the VoTeR FrAuD scam to the list. That'll be another donut for you.

[Tuesday]

Raise your hand if you thought Hunter's laptop was real.

[dot]

How is following the law a fallacy? Neat try though.

I'm sorry, I didn't know you were stupid enough to still think pivoting to avoid answering the question was valid. Enjoy struggling to answer.

If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.

Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.

[necronomous]

How is following the law a fallacy? Neat try though.

I'm sorry, I didn't know you were stupid enough to still think pivoting to avoid answering the question was valid. Enjoy struggling to answer.

If the crime was insurrection, the would be indicteed for it. But they weren't. So it's either important or it's not. Fun times.

Subpoenas defied with no charges. Your logic would say the subpoenas were never defied. Charges filed was never the argument, the argument was always what the crime was. You, just like the rest of the usual crowd, couldn't disprove the literal definition of insurrection. Thus you have as little to offer now as you did then. Run along until you have something to contribute, Red.

Sure whatever makes your delusion complete.