AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:26 pm
Cassandros wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 12:05 am
No shit. What's your point?
Using human stem-cells to create animal hybrids is not, as it currently form, ethical.
iPSC can potentially affect an animals brain, making more aware. More human. Until that is addressed and resolved- this research really shouldn't continue. But instead we have places taking the next step and mixing humans with something even closer related- monkeys.
Unethical.
My point, as clearly and repeatedly stated is that the purpose of the research is to develop the tech to grow organs for transplant, which would save tens of thousands of lives every year.
Induced pluripotent stem cells are unrelated, you appear to be just throwing in random references to things you don't know about again. Not an approach that ever works for you, is it?
Things are not unethical just because you find them icky.
Icky?
iPSC's are not related?
So, you summarize my post by completely lying about it...
Trump would be very proud of you.
Again: Just because you claim you might one day "save thousands of lives" doesn't give you the right to just do what you want without weighing the ethics of the action. These stem cells do have the capacity to imbue these animals with higher levels of consciousness, to become more sapient. This should be addressed looooong before moving forward with the actual genetic tom foolery.
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:26 pm
Cassandros wrote:
Oh, hahaha!! I'm "inventing caveats" now. That's rich.
Unless there is evidence he is forcing people to stay at his hotels, or evidence that the fees these people are paying are somehow higher than the room fee and the excess is funneling to Trump, or both- you really don't have much of a leg to stand on here.
And no amount of insults (veiled or vulgar) changes this reality. (But thanks for the laugh anyway).
Yes, you added the caveat 'only if they charge higher fees' and declared only that would make it a violation of the domestic emoluments clause. You made that up and it is false.
There is evidence he is using the powers of his office to direct federal employees to spend money at his properties. Even Pence's chief of staff admitted it was trump's suggestion.
That is not at all false, but it was also more at play with the foreign Emolument clause. If a foreign dignitary (or American, technically) stays at Trumps hotel and is not paying extra, then the POTUS is not in violation to that clause.
The domestic Emolument clause is also not being broken... granted, its by technicality. The US is
not giving money directly to Trump. These people are spending their own money out of pocket at the point of sale.
Is it bullshit? Yes
Is it unethical? Absolutely
Is it un-Constitutional? Sadly, no.