For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul commies to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison comics gets a three-day vacation.
What is the evidence of Trump's collusion?
Hint: your answer is a whataboutism and not answering the question asked.
Are you conceding the collusion occurred? Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? There just doesn't seem much point going over trump's invovlement in the meeting and the coverup if you are going to pretend the meeting wasn't collusion, is there?
I'm going to break you. I have infinite patience with these things, you're backed into a corner pretending you can't see what I've just asked you for the hundredth time, and sooner or later you will tire of pulling out your hair, pounding on your keyboard and weeping.
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Are you conceding the collusion occurred? Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? There just doesn't seem much point going over trump's invovlement in the meeting and the coverup if you are going to pretend the meeting wasn't collusion, is there?
I'm going to break you. I have infinite patience with these things, you're backed into a corner pretending you can't see what I've just asked you for the hundredth time, and sooner or later you will tire of pulling out your hair, pounding on your keyboard and weeping.
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
necronomous wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:09 pm
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
Oh good, you're admitting you have none.. good day.
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
Oh good, you're admitting you have none.. good day.
Sorry lil' buddy, you aren't getting the last word unless you can match my patience and enjoyment of your humiliation. You can run away leaving the question you can't face, or you can answer it. Only options I'm afraid, I'll keep doing this indefinitely. And I'll bring it up in every unrelated topic we discuss in future. Wouldn't it be easier to simply answer the simple question now? Why so scared lil' buddy?
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
necronomous wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:40 pm
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
Oh good, you're admitting you have none.. good day.
Sorry lil' buddy, you aren't getting the last word unless you can match my patience and enjoyment of your humiliation. You can run away leaving the question you can't face, or you can answer it. Only options I'm afraid, I'll keep doing this indefinitely. And I'll bring it up in every unrelated topic we discuss in future. Wouldn't it be easier to simply answer the simple question now? Why so scared lil' buddy?
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
You don't have to keep admitting you don't have evidence. 20 times was enough.
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
Lol
Ok
Wheres Trump's collusion?
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
Oh good, you're admitting you have none.. good day.
Sorry lil' buddy, you aren't getting the last word unless you can match my patience and enjoyment of your humiliation. You can run away leaving the question you can't face, or you can answer it. Only options I'm afraid, I'll keep doing this indefinitely. And I'll bring it up in every unrelated topic we discuss in future. Wouldn't it be easier to simply answer the simple question now? Why so scared lil' buddy?
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
You don't have to keep admitting you don't have evidence. 20 times was enough.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence. You can't walk away and you can't answer.
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
Oh good, you're admitting you have none.. good day.
Sorry lil' buddy, you aren't getting the last word unless you can match my patience and enjoyment of your humiliation. You can run away leaving the question you can't face, or you can answer it. Only options I'm afraid, I'll keep doing this indefinitely. And I'll bring it up in every unrelated topic we discuss in future. Wouldn't it be easier to simply answer the simple question now? Why so scared lil' buddy?
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
You don't have to keep admitting you don't have evidence. 20 times was enough.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence. You can't walk away and you can't answer.
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
I'm not admitting or denying anything. You haven't answered the question I've asked. So, if you don't want to answer when someone plainly asks you a question because of some odd hold up in your mind that's fine. It just shows me you have no evidence. And that's fine. Just say that. I won't hold against you. Lil rascal you.
Within the campaign collusion you can't admit happened. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is?
If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
Oh good, you're admitting you have none.. good day.
Sorry lil' buddy, you aren't getting the last word unless you can match my patience and enjoyment of your humiliation. You can run away leaving the question you can't face, or you can answer it. Only options I'm afraid, I'll keep doing this indefinitely. And I'll bring it up in every unrelated topic we discuss in future. Wouldn't it be easier to simply answer the simple question now? Why so scared lil' buddy?
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
You don't have to keep admitting you don't have evidence. 20 times was enough.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence. You can't walk away and you can't answer.
Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion when it kicks you in the nuts. Over and over.
I'm not admitting or denying anything. You haven't answered the question I've asked. So, if you don't want to answer when someone plainly asks you a question because of some odd hold up in your mind that's fine. It just shows me you have no evidence. And that's fine. Just say that. I won't hold against you. Lil rascal you.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence. You can't walk away and you can't answer.
I'm trying to answer but you're running away. Does going to meet a russian government representative offering help from the russian government with the election constitute collusion with the russian interference? Or are you incapable of admitting collusion is possible no matter what the evidence is? If you want to explore the trump collusion, all you have to do is admit you can see the collusion it was part of. All you are doing here is demonstrating that you are not capable of admitting collusion. If you can admit that is collusion I will patiently explain to you how trump was involved in it. Then I will raise another example, repeat it for ten pages or so until you can admit it is also a collusion example, then explain trump's personal involvement. And so on. In each case you will repeat your starting conclusion, but each time you will have to admit collusion occurred, and make excuses for trump's involvement with it.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence.
Pretty sure the entire board is waiting on any evidence. Pins and needles! Someone let me know when the first of it shows up.
Until then, I'll be over at GD looking at tits.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'd be just as happy to take you through the next step? What do you say lil buddy, can you bring yourself to do it?
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence.
Pretty sure the entire board is waiting on any evidence. Pins and needles! Someone let me know when the first of it shows up.
Until then, I'll be over at GD looking at tits.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'd be just as happy to take you through the next step? What do you say lil buddy, can you bring yourself to do it?
Can you just answer the question I ask you lil' rascal. If you'd like to admit there's no evidence, you can just do that instead looking the fool.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence.
Pretty sure the entire board is waiting on any evidence. Pins and needles! Someone let me know when the first of it shows up.
Until then, I'll be over at GD looking at tits.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'd be just as happy to take you through the next step? What do you say lil buddy, can you bring yourself to do it?
Can you just answer the question I ask you lil' rascal. If you'd like to admit there's no evidence, you can just do that instead looking the fool.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'll take you through the next step. If you pretend you can't see that collusion is collusion, I can't show you how any particular person has colluded because you are denying anyone ever could. See the problem? Can't show you 1+1 is 2 if you refuse to acknowledge 1 can exist.
Currently you refuse to admit that colluding with the russians is colluding with the russians. You're going to need to try a little harder.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence.
Pretty sure the entire board is waiting on any evidence. Pins and needles! Someone let me know when the first of it shows up.
Until then, I'll be over at GD looking at tits.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'd be just as happy to take you through the next step? What do you say lil buddy, can you bring yourself to do it?
Can you just answer the question I ask you lil' rascal. If you'd like to admit there's no evidence, you can just do that instead looking the fool.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'll take you through the next step. If you pretend you can't see that collusion is collusion, I can't show you how any particular person has colluded because you are denying anyone ever could. See the problem? Can't show you 1+1 is 2 if you refuse to acknowledge 1 can exist.
Where did I deny anything? Show me. I'll wait. I asked how did trump collude, you went to trump campaign. You can show me 1+1 =2 all you want. I asked what 3+4 was.
You do have to keep admitting you refuse to look at any evidence.
Pretty sure the entire board is waiting on any evidence. Pins and needles! Someone let me know when the first of it shows up.
Until then, I'll be over at GD looking at tits.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'd be just as happy to take you through the next step? What do you say lil buddy, can you bring yourself to do it?
Can you just answer the question I ask you lil' rascal. If you'd like to admit there's no evidence, you can just do that instead looking the fool.
Well if you'd like to go ahead and admit you can see that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference, I'll take you through the next step. If you pretend you can't see that collusion is collusion, I can't show you how any particular person has colluded because you are denying anyone ever could. See the problem? Can't show you 1+1 is 2 if you refuse to acknowledge 1 can exist.
Where did I deny anything? Show me. I'll wait. I asked how did trump collude, you went to trump campaign. You can show me 1+1 =2 all you want. I asked what 3+4 was.
So you're admitting that meeting someone from the russian government offering to help interfere in the election is colluding with the election interference now then? That's great progress! Just confirm that for me and we'll move on.
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:27 pm
Wait, let me guess, you're going to just deny that you are denying it, but also claim you aren't confirming it
Such a convincing dodge you've come up with, you've really fooled everyone and aren't at all looking stupid.
So now you can't show where I've denied anything, nor can you show evidence of Trump's collusion.
necronomous wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:41 pm
So now you can't show where I've denied anything, nor can you show evidence of Trump's collusion.
You can’t even admit there was collusion at all, seeing you dance around it makes you look the fool.
I'm with Necro on this one. He asked for any evidence showing that Trump himself colluded. There is none. Hammy moved the goalposts to the 'Trump Campaign' and others. Hammy won't admit it. Another multi-page rabbit hole to nowhere. In the end, Necro will get tired of replying to the same non-answers, Hammy will claim a hollow victory. The end.
PimpDaddy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:39 pm
I'm with Necro on this one. He asked for any evidence showing that Trump himself colluded. There is none. Hammy moved the goalposts to the 'Trump Campaign' and others. Hammy won't admit it. Another multi-page rabbit hole to nowhere. In the end, Necro will get tired of replying to the same non-answers, Hammy will claim a hollow victory. The end.
It’s not moving the goalposts. It’s setting a baseline. If you’re rejecting reality from the outset, you’re proving the point that it doesn’t matter what is posted. You’ll lulz and nope and ignore then repeat your false narrative as though nothing happened.
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:27 pm
Wait, let me guess, you're going to just deny that you are denying it, but also claim you aren't confirming it
Such a convincing dodge you've come up with, you've really fooled everyone and aren't at all looking stupid.
So now you can't show where I've denied anything, nor can you show evidence of Trump's collusion.
If you're saying you don't even dare deny or confirm, sure, you are that cowardly. I'm taking your refusal to do either as denial, because why on earth else would you refuse to answer at all?
Got some alternative explanation for why you'd spend half a dozen pages refusing to answer a simple question? You can't face the answer you'd have to give is the only one I can come up with.
necronomous wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:41 pm
So now you can't show where I've denied anything, nor can you show evidence of Trump's collusion.
You can’t even admit there was collusion at all, seeing you dance around it makes you look the fool.
I'm with Necro on this one. He asked for any evidence showing that Trump himself colluded. There is none. Hammy moved the goalposts to the 'Trump Campaign' and others. Hammy won't admit it. Another multi-page rabbit hole to nowhere. In the end, Necro will get tired of replying to the same non-answers, Hammy will claim a hollow victory. The end.
Yes there is, but if you're denying the campaign colluded or, as you both are doing, just refusing to even admit seeing the question did the campaign collude, what would be the point in exploring which members of the campaign were involved? I said clearly and explicitly on page 1 I would prove to any of you delusional trump cucks that the trump campaign colluded. Once we have established you can grasp that reality, I will be happy to take any of you who are interested through the evidence that trump himself was personally involved. If you deny collusion occurred at all in the face of overwhelming evidence there's no point trying to get you to admit who participated in it.
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:27 pm
Wait, let me guess, you're going to just deny that you are denying it, but also claim you aren't confirming it
Such a convincing dodge you've come up with, you've really fooled everyone and aren't at all looking stupid.
So now you can't show where I've denied anything, nor can you show evidence of Trump's collusion.
If you're saying you don't even dare deny or confirm, sure, you are that cowardly. I'm taking your refusal to do either as denial, because why on earth else would you refuse to answer at all?
Got some alternative explanation for why you'd spend half a dozen pages refusing to answer a simple question? You can't face the answer you'd have to give is the only one I can come up with.
I don't know, why the fuck would you refuse to answer the simple question I asked you?
PimpDaddy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:39 pm
I'm with Necro on this one. He asked for any evidence showing that Trump himself colluded. There is none. Hammy moved the goalposts to the 'Trump Campaign' and others. Hammy won't admit it. Another multi-page rabbit hole to nowhere. In the end, Necro will get tired of replying to the same non-answers, Hammy will claim a hollow victory. The end.
It’s not moving the goalposts. It’s setting a baseline. If you’re rejecting reality from the outset, you’re proving the point that it doesn’t matter what is posted. You’ll lulz and nope and ignore then repeat your false narrative as though nothing happened.
Why does he get to set a baseline to a question? No one has rejected anything. So what he has done is say fuck you trying to have an honest question, I THINK you're going to respond a certain way without giving you a chance because I KNOW how you're going to react. What a bullshit method of controlling a debate that only an idiot like you would fall for.