On Manafort giving "polling data" to a Russian Operative

[stymiegreen]

[AnalHamster]

Is providing polling data to others a crime?

Campaign finance violations for accepting valuable help from Russian intelligence in the quid pro quo, possible fraud on the part of Manafort if he benefited personally, since he gave millions of dollars worth of proprietary information to Russian intelligence.

Collusion, as you trump cucks fell back on a while ago, isn't in itself a crime though. This is just firm evidence of your president's campaign colluding with an influence campaign run by the GRU. Comfortable with that, traitorcuck?

[stymiegreen]

Is providing polling data to others a crime?

Campaign finance violations for accepting valuable help from Russian intelligence in the quid pro quo, possible fraud on the part of Manafort if he benefited personally, since he gave millions of dollars worth of proprietary information to Russian intelligence.

Collusion, as you trump cucks fell back on a while ago, isn't in itself a crime though. This is just firm evidence of your president's campaign colluding with an influence campaign run by the GRU. Comfortable with that, traitorcuck?

for biker the ends justify the means. Sad!

[AnalHamster]

Is providing polling data to others a crime?

Campaign finance violations for accepting valuable help from Russian intelligence in the quid pro quo, possible fraud on the part of Manafort if he benefited personally, since he gave millions of dollars worth of proprietary information to Russian intelligence.

Collusion, as you trump cucks fell back on a while ago, isn't in itself a crime though. This is just firm evidence of your president's campaign colluding with an influence campaign run by the GRU. Comfortable with that, traitorcuck?

Thats a lot of words for a 'no'

You're so deep in trumps ass you couldn't recognise that no was not in fact the answer I gave.

[Wut]

I saw a few yesses in there.

[CaptQuint]

[beagleboy]

The NYTimes writers who came out with this story have adjusted it. It wasn't a Russian operative but a Ukrainian businessman.

Woops.

[CaptQuint]

The NYTimes writers who came out with this story have adjusted it. It wasn't a Russian operative but a Ukrainian businessman.

Woops.

Clearly no Russian operatives in Ukraine.

[AnalHamster]

The NYTimes writers who came out with this story have adjusted it. It wasn't a Russian operative but a Ukrainian businessman.

Woops.

Nope, the intermediary was a Russian operative tied to Russian intelligence by US prosecutors in addition to the NYT. He was just supposed to get the data to 2 Ukranian oligarchs instead of 1 Russian oligarch.

A previous version of this article misidentified the people to whom Paul Manafort wanted a Russian associate to send polling data. Mr. Manafort wanted the data sent to two Ukrainian oligarchs, Serhiy Lyovochkin and Rinat Akhmetov, not to Oleg V. Deripaska, a Russian oligarch close to the Kremlin.