Page 96 of 530

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:14 pm
by B-Tender

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:20 pm
by Reservoir Dog
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:11 pm
How many times are you planning on posting this?

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:22 pm
by B-Tender

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:24 pm
by Animal
i just don't see how you can argue with that.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:27 pm
by WestTexasCrude
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:23 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:17 pm
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:11 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:09 pm
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:04 pm
Cassandros wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:50 pm ^^ $$



Watching the reactions to Ricky Gervais's "jokes" is epic.
Totally Brilliant and I was glad to hear some hefty applause at this/ " So if you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a platform to make a political speech, right? You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg. So if you win, come up, accept your little award, thank your agent and your God, and [bleep].”
I agree. It's about time someone put these ignorant celebrities in their place. Most of them don't even have a high school education yet they want to tell us something about politics or the environment? Like he said, they should just STFU. They are the biggest abusers of destroying the environment with all of their yachts, mansions and jets than anyone.
Yep
You guys know that was just a shtick... right?
Sure. Put it was full of fact and spot on at the same time.
If anyone will go back and look at the nominations for the Golden Globes for "The Irishman", everybody is there. From the specs, director, actors (Pacino, Pesci , etc) with one notable exception. Even though he had the leading role, De Niro didn't get one nomination. It's a "STFU with the political BS" from the higher ups.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:35 pm
by Reservoir Dog
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:27 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:23 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:17 pm
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:11 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:09 pm
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:04 pm
Totally Brilliant and I was glad to hear some hefty applause at this/ " So if you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a platform to make a political speech, right? You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg. So if you win, come up, accept your little award, thank your agent and your God, and [bleep].”
I agree. It's about time someone put these ignorant celebrities in their place. Most of them don't even have a high school education yet they want to tell us something about politics or the environment? Like he said, they should just STFU. They are the biggest abusers of destroying the environment with all of their yachts, mansions and jets than anyone.
Yep
You guys know that was just a shtick... right?
Sure. Put it was full of fact and spot on at the same time.
If anyone will go back and look at the nominations for the Golden Globes for "The Irishman", everybody is there. From the specs, director, actors (Pacino, Pesci , etc) with one notable exception. Even though he had the leading role, De Niro didn't get one nomination. It's a "STFU with the political BS" from the higher ups.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Fuck, you're stupid.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:54 pm
by WestTexasCrude
Reservoir Dog wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:35 pm
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:27 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:23 pm
Reservoir Dog wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:17 pm
WestTexasCrude wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:11 pm
FreakShowFanatic wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:09 pm
I agree. It's about time someone put these ignorant celebrities in their place. Most of them don't even have a high school education yet they want to tell us something about politics or the environment? Like he said, they should just STFU. They are the biggest abusers of destroying the environment with all of their yachts, mansions and jets than anyone.
Yep
You guys know that was just a shtick... right?
Sure. Put it was full of fact and spot on at the same time.
If anyone will go back and look at the nominations for the Golden Globes for "The Irishman", everybody is there. From the specs, director, actors (Pacino, Pesci , etc) with one notable exception. Even though he had the leading role, De Niro didn't get one nomination. It's a "STFU with the political BS" from the higher ups.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Fuck, you're stupid.
Fuck you're Canadian. Enough said.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:20 pm
by Animal
Biker wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:03 pm ...
serious question. why does human trafficking seem to be your mantra?

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:29 pm
by Animal
Biker wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:09 pm
NuFlumper wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:20 pm
Biker wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:03 pm ...
serious question. why does human trafficking seem to be your mantra?
For the same reason your mantra is banning killy looking guns

But seriously, its horrific crime and every person should care more about it than they presently do. Imagine being a family of a loved one who just up and disappeared, knowing there's a good chance that they had been sold into the sex trafficking market. Its far worse than murder IMO. Im a sustaining contributor to two worthy org, AbolitionNC and the Polaris Project. Check them out
i'm not questioning the cause or the importance of it, i was just more curious if you had some tie to it (ie. a friend or whatever that had been caught up in it). everyone these days seems to be big into animal rights and vegan this and that. it is sort of unexpected to hear this one, but I have heard you mention it many times over the years.

to be honest, until you mentioned human trafficking in relation to massage parlor sex, I had never equated the two.

Edit: and funny you should mention, i'm on the way out the door right this second to buy an AR-15.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:22 pm
by Animal
Biker wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:34 pm TBF, I vacillate constantly on my stance of gun control.
I do, too. i hate people that are firmly on one side or the other. its not that simple.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:26 pm
by B-Tender
Image

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:32 pm
by CaptQuint
Image

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:47 pm
by QillerDaemon
Florida may be "green" for those statutes, but it's questionable how much help they really are in controlling any actual trafficking. Despite them, the tourist district of Orlando is considered one of the very worst areas (some say the very worst) for human trafficking, and the traffickers basically simply disregard the laws against such trade. Not far behind is the Kissimmee tourist area east of Disneyworld. The cops are out-numbered against this business.
Biker wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:03 pm Image

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:10 pm
by CaptQuint
Image

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:26 pm
by Animal
that's weird. if i had been on that flight, i would now be a member of the mile high club.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:07 pm
by HighNDry
Flumper wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:26 pm that's weird. if i had been on that flight, i would now be a member of the mile high club.
Jesus Christ. What a whore. And to think, that’s someone’s daughter.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:29 pm
by Stapes
She got 6 months in jail for her little tirade...lol



A 20-year-old British woman said her intense fear of flying made her get so hammered that she tried browbeating male passengers into joining the “mile high club” and attacked crew members, biting a flight attendant and an anesthesiologist who was on board.

That defense wasn’t enough to keep her out of jail after a courtroom in England heard details of what witnesses called a four-hour rampage and an anesthesiologist said was worse than anything he’d ever seen in a hospital emergency room.
The ruckus started when an already drunk Demi Burton, 20, boarded the eight-hour Etihad Airways flight from Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, to Manchester, England, last May 9. She was traveling from Australia, where she had just spent three months visiting relatives, according to The Telegraph.
She’ll now spend twice that amount of time in jail.

The inebriated Burton proceeded to order and guzzle red wine until cabin crew refused her service, witnesses said in her trial. At 30,000 feet, she “shocked two men by making crude comments about them having mid-air sex,” the Manchester Evening News reported.

“It appears she was drunk before getting on the flight and she started making a number of inappropriate sexual comments to a number of male passengers on the flight,” prosecutor Claire Brocklebank said, according to The Telegraph. “Two in particular remember hearing comments, and at first they laughed it off but it then became more and more increasingly inappropriate, and she asked them to join the mile high club.”
But Burton didn’t get the hint.

“Both tried to end conversation with her, but she carried on,” Brocklebank continued. “One said he felt quite shocked by her comments, and people around her started to ask her to be quiet as others could hear.”

hat’s what got her cut off, at the request of a passenger. However, it didn’t quite take. After being refused two red wines from one flight attendant, she approached another who had not yet been given the message, so was served the wine, Brocklebank said.
“Ten minutes later she was asking for more and was shouting, and the decision was made it would not be appropriate to allow this particular passenger anymore alcohol,” Brocklebank said.

When the crew said her drinking time was over, Burton then went “berserk,” witnesses told the Evening News, “as 259 passengers looked on.”
So began a four-hour rampage that required six people – passengers and crew – to restrain her, Brocklebank told the court, according to the Manchester Evening News. Burton headbutted people severely enough to bruise them, and bit two others
. One was an anesthesiologist who said her behavior rivaled anything he’d see in the A&E, the British version of the E.R. The other biting victim was a flight attendant.
Burton was arrested upon landing.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:29 pm
by Animal
HighNDry wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:07 pm
Flumper wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:26 pm that's weird. if i had been on that flight, i would now be a member of the mile high club.
Jesus Christ. What a whore. And to think, that’s someone’s daughter.
i'm gonna bet that someone is very very rich.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:32 pm
by Stapes
At least she is contrite and learned her lesson.



Image

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:35 pm
by HighNDry
Flumper wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:29 pm
HighNDry wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 6:07 pm
Flumper wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:26 pm that's weird. if i had been on that flight, i would now be a member of the mile high club.
Jesus Christ. What a whore. And to think, that’s someone’s daughter.
i'm gonna bet that someone is very very rich.
Bailing out drunk sluts ain’t cheap.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 7:10 pm
by beagleboy
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:26 pm Leonard DiCaprio
If I were him I'd do the exact same thing.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 8:44 pm
by B-Tender
beagleboy wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 7:10 pm
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:26 pm Leonard DiCaprio
If I were him I'd do the exact same thing.
No judgment here. I prefer 28-35 yr old women myself. To each their own.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:19 pm
by Blast
B-Tender wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 8:44 pm
beagleboy wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 7:10 pm
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:26 pm Leonard DiCaprio
If I were him I'd do the exact same thing.
No judgment here. I prefer 28-35 yr old women myself. To each their own.
Every time I set a damn age limit it gets busted. My top end had been 48

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:22 pm
by Animal
Blast wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:19 pm
Every time I set a damn age limit it gets busted. My top end had been 48
look at the upside. menopause will start working in your favor.

Re: Post nothing for good reason (NSFW)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:46 pm
by B-Tender
Blast wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:19 pm
B-Tender wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 8:44 pm
beagleboy wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 7:10 pm
B-Tender wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:26 pm Leonard DiCaprio
If I were him I'd do the exact same thing.
No judgment here. I prefer 28-35 yr old women myself. To each their own.
Every time I set a damn age limit it gets busted. My top end had been 48
Oh I go older, I just meant I found the sweet spot for me to be 28-35. Personality wise I probably do better with women 35-45.