TDS totally not happening

[dot]

Anyone wanna guess why the right is not being very forthcoming on their sources? Lemme give the hack a hint, Biker isn't browsing courtlistener.com for news sources to post. But hey, you get a point for one of you finally being brave enough to link the quoted article. Let us know when you're ready to tackle the bias of the source next.

[saltydog]

Anyone wanna guess why the right is not being very forthcoming on their sources? Lemme give the hack a hint, Biker isn't browsing courtlistener.com for news sources to post. But hey, you get a point for one of you finally being brave enough to link the quoted article. Let us know when you're ready to tackle the bias of the source next.

Their gullibility to swallow anything that justifies their MAGA infected stances has no bounds.

[Biker]

My word, you two are reaching Ricky level stupidity.

[dot]

Aw, hiding your source didn't work out this time for you. Sorry for that, you could always do better and use reliable non partisan reporting. But you elected to go with Nah.

[Biker]

Why would I hide a primary source that buttresses my premise? It’s almost as if you’ve never written a research paper

[dot]

Cheez doesn't like people who are dishonest. Sorry for your imminent falling out too.

[CHEEZY17]

Cheez doesn't like people who are dishonest. Sorry for your imminent falling out too.

Dude, the source is literally in the article and then Biker even posted it. You just cant stand when youre wrong.

[dot]

The source is the article. Post #1. You do understand how threads start right? Unless you truly believe Biker dredges courtlistener.com for subject material, and then goes out and finds a media outlet that wrote about it, but you wouldn't want to be disingenuous right, hack? It still boils down to posting a Federalist propaganda article and refusing to identify it.

[Reservoir Dog]

The source is the article. Post #1. You do understand how threads start right? Unless you truly believe Biker dredges courtlistener.com for subject material, and then goes out and finds a media outlet that wrote about it, but you wouldn't want to be disingenuous right, hack? It still boils down to posting a Federalist propaganda article and refusing to identify it.

His "primary" source is a press application for access to highly redacted records.

[dot]

His "primary" source is a press application for access to highly redacted records.

Like how he had the Boeing CEO on speed dial, right?

Fun fact, it looks like someone went and purged a lot of his posts on that thread. Now what possible reason could there have been for that?

[Biker]

His "primary" source is a press application for access to highly redacted records.

Like how he had the Boeing CEO on speed dial, right?

Fun fact, it looks like someone went and purged a lot of his posts on that thread. Now what possible reason could there have been for that?

Still waiting for the official report BTW

[dot]

Sure you are.

[saltydog]

[dot]

So what officially are the rules on necro'ing a thread? Cause that was a fascinating reread, and with the final report being out now despite Biker patiently still waiting for it, it would serve to post there. Or I can bring it here so as not to revive a dead thread where a bet was welched and attempted to be expunged from the history books.