For all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul socialists to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison political cartoons gets a three-day vacation.
that literally has to be the case in Italy. Their death toll can't be 10% of the infected population. I honestly believe that every country has the same percentage of deaths (statistically), so anyone showing anything over 1.5% has a very large population that had VERY minor symptoms.
The plus is that there are a shit ton of people that could give plasma to treat very sick patients, PLUS a shit ton of people that can go back to work who are now immune.
The minus is that the death rate from this epidemic is MUCH lower than all the fear mongers were telling us.
that literally has to be the case in Italy. Their death toll can't be 10% of the infected population. I honestly believe that every country has the same percentage of deaths (statistically), so anyone showing anything over 1.5% has a very large population that had VERY minor symptoms.
The plus is that there are a shit ton of people that could give plasma to treat very sick patients, PLUS a shit ton of people that can go back to work who are now immune.
The minus is that the death rate from this epidemic is MUCH lower than all the fear mongers were telling us.
Flumper wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 3:46 pm
How in the fucking fuck did France go from 2,100 new cases on Thursday to 23,000 new cases on Friday? What in the ever loving fuck?
this is why tracking data is so fucking futile when everyone makes up their own rules.
French coronavirus cases jump above China's after including nursing home tally
Flumper wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 3:46 pm
How in the fucking fuck did France go from 2,100 new cases on Thursday to 23,000 new cases on Friday? What in the ever loving fuck?
this is why tracking data is so fucking futile when everyone makes up their own rules.
French coronavirus cases jump above China's after including nursing home tally
CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:26 pm
Ah, James Woods world renown nutjob
I cant blame you for not listening to her but she was talking about the federal government can never do too much during a crisis. 3 months ago she was bitching about Trump being a dictator.
Think about it.
What is the purpose of a Federal Government?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:26 pm
Ah, James Woods world renown nutjob
I cant blame you for not listening to her but she was talking about the federal government can never do too much during a crisis. 3 months ago she was bitching about Trump being a dictator.
Think about it.
You don't think situations should determine when we have more, or less government? For instance, after 5 years of economic growth we should have been getting away from QE and ultra low interest rates?
CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:26 pm
Ah, James Woods world renown nutjob
I cant blame you for not listening to her but she was talking about the federal government can never do too much during a crisis. 3 months ago she was bitching about Trump being a dictator.
Think about it.
You don't think situations should determine when we have more, or less government? For instance, after 5 years of economic growth we should have been getting away from QE and ultra low interest rates?
The government does not control the Federal Reserve
Does Trump know that?
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:26 pm
Ah, James Woods world renown nutjob
I cant blame you for not listening to her but she was talking about the federal government can never do too much during a crisis. 3 months ago she was bitching about Trump being a dictator.
Think about it.
You don't think situations should determine when we have more, or less government? For instance, after 5 years of economic growth we should have been getting away from QE and ultra low interest rates?
The government does not control the Federal Reserve
Answer the first question first please. Secondly, you don't think the President has influence on the Fed Reserve?
Biker wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:44 pm
Guys, we're veering into waters that are very political. We should request permission from RD to discuss government philosophy
Any damn fool can navigate the world sober. It takes a really good sailor to do it drunk
“I have never had a situation where a member of the [Obama] administration has tried in any way to pressure me for any reason about the stance of monetary policy,” Yellen said.
that literally has to be the case in Italy. Their death toll can't be 10% of the infected population. I honestly believe that every country has the same percentage of deaths (statistically), so anyone showing anything over 1.5% has a very large population that had VERY minor symptoms.
The plus is that there are a shit ton of people that could give plasma to treat very sick patients, PLUS a shit ton of people that can go back to work who are now immune.
The minus is that the death rate from this epidemic is MUCH lower than all the fear mongers were telling us.
We can't even make enough tests for people showing symptoms, it'll be a while before they're testing for antibodies. Though it sure would be useful, both for getting back to normal, and finding out more about this disease.
CaptQuint wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:26 pm
Ah, James Woods world renown nutjob
I cant blame you for not listening to her but she was talking about the federal government can never do too much during a crisis. 3 months ago she was bitching about Trump being a dictator.
Think about it.
You don't think situations should determine when we have more, or less government? For instance, after 5 years of economic growth we should have been getting away from QE and ultra low interest rates?
The government does not control the Federal Reserve
Answer the first question first please. Secondly, you don't think the President has influence on the Fed Reserve?
Of course rates shouldve been raised, And yeah, Im sure Obama and Trump pressured the chairman to not raise them
The first question was, don't you think governments should let current situations determine how much they are involved? Secondly, don't worry about RD. He's weak right now, and won't be a threat unless he coughs at us.
You don't think situations should determine when we have more, or less government? For instance, after 5 years of economic growth we should have been getting away from QE and ultra low interest rates?
The government does not control the Federal Reserve
Answer the first question first please. Secondly, you don't think the President has influence on the Fed Reserve?
Of course rates shouldve been raised, And yeah, Im sure Obama and Trump pressured the chairman to not raise them
The first question was, don't you think governments should let current situations determine how much they are involved? Secondly, don't worry about RD. He's weak right now, and won't be a threat unless he coughs at us.
No, I think governments should be limited to what their binding documents state. If they deem a situation to be a national emergency, then declare martial law and be done with it
If you give someone only one tool, and it's a hammer, everything will be beat to shit.