Page 3 of 3
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
by Biker
Who wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 12:13 am
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:29 pm
Who wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:28 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:18 pm
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 3:34 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 3:29 pm
1. Deny voter fraud happens
2. Admit that there is voter fraud but not on the scale that it impacts elections
(We are here)
3. Acknowledge that there is widespead fraud
4. Say that Republicans do it too
Never said one or three. What republicans do is use the myth of widespread voter fraud to attempt widespread voter suppression.
You understand chump is lying about 2020, right?
Maybe, but no one who is reasonable can say that mail in ballots are 100% secure
Why not?
Because there is no way to ensure that the ballot was completed by the person it claims.
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
Signatures can be forged very easily.
Why do you not want to protect the sanctity of our elections? (I know the answer)
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 3:10 pm
by Who
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
Who wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 12:13 am
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:29 pm
Who wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:28 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:18 pm
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 3:34 pm
Never said one or three. What republicans do is use the myth of widespread voter fraud to attempt widespread voter suppression.
You understand chump is lying about 2020, right?
Maybe, but no one who is reasonable can say that mail in ballots are 100% secure
Why not?
Because there is no way to ensure that the ballot was completed by the person it claims.
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
Signatures can be forged very easily.
Why do you not want to protect the sanctity of our elections? (I know the answer)
Why do you want to suppress people voting?
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 3:13 pm
by Biker
Who wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 3:10 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
Who wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 12:13 am
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:29 pm
Who wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:28 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:18 pm
Maybe, but no one who is reasonable can say that mail in ballots are 100% secure
Why not?
Because there is no way to ensure that the ballot was completed by the person it claims.
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
Signatures can be forged very easily.
Why do you not want to protect the sanctity of our elections? (I know the answer)
Why do you want to suppress people voting?
How would I be suppressing? Specifics will do
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 4:06 pm
by Who
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 3:13 pm
Who wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 3:10 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
Who wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 12:13 am
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:29 pm
Who wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:28 pm
Why not?
Because there is no way to ensure that the ballot was completed by the person it claims.
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
Signatures can be forged very easily.
Why do you not want to protect the sanctity of our elections? (I know the answer)
Why do you want to suppress people voting?
How would I be suppressing? Specifics will do
By blocking absentee ballots
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 5:06 pm
by QillerDaemon
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
How much does your signature match between what it looks like in the tiny strip on the back of a credit card as opposed to scrawled over a large blank piece of paper? The signature on my driver licence barely matches much with what I write on a restaurant receipt.
And who's making the judgment on what's a match? Actual trained forensic document examiners, or "Joe the van driver, he can tell and stuff!"?
edit: fuck it, I ain't editing that.
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 5:11 pm
by Animal
QillerDaemon wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 5:06 pm
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
How much does your signature match between what it looks like in the tiny strip on the back of a credit card as opposed to scrawled over a large blank piece of paper? The signature on my driver licence barely matches much with what I write on a restaurant receipt.
And who's making the judgment on what's a match? Actual trained forensic document examiners, or "Joe the van driver, he can tell and stuff!"?
as much as I agree with your logic here, you are arguing with Who, not Biker.
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 5:12 pm
by Animal
Who wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 12:13 am
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:29 pm
Because there is no way to ensure that the ballot was completed by the person it claims.
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
...
Re: More voter fraud just not happening
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2026 9:01 pm
by CHEEZY17
I'm sure the signature checkers are all fine folks.
