I'm not struggling with anything. I'm still waiting for this huge list of locked up people you say there are. And no comment about the DNC involvement with Russia.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:17 amYes, he lied about the contacts between the trump campaign and the russkies. You seem to be struggling with the concept that the coverup is the crime.PopcornSutton wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:55 pmOh boy, he served 12 days and is out on probation of sorts. He lied, he brought it on himself. Cohen did the same thing. Where are the people that were caught, convicted of an actual crime and went to jail? At this point, I believe you have no objectivity at all, the only thing that drives you is the "never trump" syndrome. HeAnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 7:26 pmWhat? Are you saying you are so far down the delusion hole you genuinely can't determine for yourself that anyone went to prison behind the Mueller investigation? Because that is delusion to the point of insanity. George popadopolous is an example already raised of one who went to jail. There are more, but at this point I'm just trying to determine your level of sanity..PopcornSutton wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 7:09 pmFirst, name who has gone to jail. Second, if there was russian interference "of fact", charges would have been issued. I'm not taking your word just because you say it's "fact".AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:18 pmActually lots were charged and a bunch went to jail on the chump team for their coverup attempts, the Russian GRU agents were just indicted as Russia won't hand them over. The question I asked you was are you capable of recognising the established fact that there was russian interference in the 2016 election?PopcornSutton wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:53 pm If there were irrefutable proof that Trump was involved with manipulating the election results, he would not be in office. It hasn't happened. There is also records of the DNC and Russian involvement, they haven't been charged either. There is as much speculation on the democratic side as there is on the republican side. Actually I think there is more evidence against the dems involved, but again, nothing has happened. Nobody has been charged, nobody is in jail, and it doesn't look like there will be.
What would the media do if to weren't for churning this shit?
The Necro-Hammy Romance - aka Necro's epic dodge
Moderator: Biker
- PopcornSutton
- Shit Meme Poster
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:11 am
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
What DNC involvement with Russia? Is there some reason you cannot google 'mueller indictments' for yourself? This is not hard to locate information-PopcornSutton wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:32 amI'm not struggling with anything. I'm still waiting for this huge list of locked up people you say there are. And no comment about the DNC involvement with Russia.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:17 amYes, he lied about the contacts between the trump campaign and the russkies. You seem to be struggling with the concept that the coverup is the crime.PopcornSutton wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:55 pmOh boy, he served 12 days and is out on probation of sorts. He lied, he brought it on himself. Cohen did the same thing. Where are the people that were caught, convicted of an actual crime and went to jail? At this point, I believe you have no objectivity at all, the only thing that drives you is the "never trump" syndrome. HeAnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 7:26 pmWhat? Are you saying you are so far down the delusion hole you genuinely can't determine for yourself that anyone went to prison behind the Mueller investigation? Because that is delusion to the point of insanity. George popadopolous is an example already raised of one who went to jail. There are more, but at this point I'm just trying to determine your level of sanity..PopcornSutton wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 7:09 pmFirst, name who has gone to jail. Second, if there was russian interference "of fact", charges would have been issued. I'm not taking your word just because you say it's "fact".AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:18 pm Actually lots were charged and a bunch went to jail on the chump team for their coverup attempts, the Russian GRU agents were just indicted as Russia won't hand them over. The question I asked you was are you capable of recognising the established fact that there was russian interference in the 2016 election?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_C ... 80%932019)
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
No you are giving me what you are saying is trump campaign collusion. What did I ask for? Proof of trump himself colluding. Just do that. But no you won't because of some weird stupid going through your head. What does it matter if I admit the campaign or not, I'm not asking for the campaign. I've ran from nothing. You are the one being dodgy as fuck.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 amThat's from the first page, so really the conversation is more like this -AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 am
The russkies did interfere in your campaign, the trump campaign did collude with them in doing so. It's not a conspiracy if it's real. Would you like to go through some examples of the collusion?
necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:10 pm I'm not even saying he didn't collude, I just want the proof.
This is essentially the conversation with AH:
AH: Mueller proves trump campaign collusion, repeatedly
Me: Prove it
AH: Ok here you go
Me: waaaah! No! You have to prove trump personally did it while wearing a tutu and riding a rhinoceros! THat's what you said!
AH: umm, ok. Let's get to that after you admit I just demonstratraed trump campaign collusion as I said I would way back on page 1.
Me: waah derple can't admit that so must run away
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Giving you exactly what I said I would from the start, yes. You seem to have confused yourself by answering 'lo l ok' initially.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:50 amNo you are giving me what you are saying is trump campaign collusion. What did I ask for? Proof of trump himself colluding. Just do that. But no you won't because of some weird stupid going through your head. What does it matter if I admit the campaign or not, I'm not asking for the campaign. I've ran from nothing. You are the one being dodgy as fuck.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 amThat's from the first page, so really the conversation is more like this -AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 am
The russkies did interfere in your campaign, the trump campaign did collude with them in doing so. It's not a conspiracy if it's real. Would you like to go through some examples of the collusion?
necronomous wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:10 pm I'm not even saying he didn't collude, I just want the proof.
This is essentially the conversation with AH:
AH: Mueller proves trump campaign collusion, repeatedly
Me: Prove it
AH: Ok here you go
Me: waaaah! No! You have to prove trump personally did it while wearing a tutu and riding a rhinoceros! THat's what you said!
AH: umm, ok. Let's get to that after you admit I just demonstratraed trump campaign collusion as I said I would way back on page 1.
Me: waah derple can't admit that so must run away
If you can't admit that meeting a russian government representative offering help from the russian government constitutes collusion then there's really no point. As I've said, we can go over some examples of trump's personal involvement once you pull on your big boy pants and admit being capable of recognising collusion can actually exist. Are you denying there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign, or not?
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 amStart with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:20 pmThis also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 amStart with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Just go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:25 pmFirst I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:20 pmThis also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 amStart with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Also no one is running. Just prove what you need to prove.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:25 pmFirst I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:20 pmThis also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 amStart with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
You can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:38 pmJust go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:25 pmFirst I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:20 pmThis also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 amStart with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Why can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:43 pmYou can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:38 pmJust go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:25 pmFirst I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:20 pmThis also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 amStart with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Yes, we've established you tried to move the goalposts. Thing is though, it doesn't matter - You want to examine trump's involvement in the collusion between his campaign and the russian interference campaign right? But you refuse to admit that collusion can possibly exist and claim it isn't relevant if it does. This makes you look very stupid, and that is something I enjoy.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:53 pmWhy can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:43 pmYou can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:38 pmJust go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:25 pmFirst I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:20 pmThis also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:35 am Start with an easy one shall we? His son, son in law and campaign manager took a meeting with someone claiming to represent the Russian government and wanting to help with the campaign.
Why are you so terrified of admitting the campaign collusion?
- VinceBordenIII
- Loves swimmin' with bowlegged women!
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:03 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:24 pm Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
I never tried to move the goal post. I asked prove Trump. That's ALL I've asked. But you need me to admit things about shit I didn't ask for. I don't refuse to admit his campaign colluded on anything, I don't admit they did either, but that's NOT what I asked. Not once. No goal post moved. No different expectations other than that. Just that. Don't need to or not to admit to anything else. Just respond to the question I originally asked. Prove Trump. So if you can't do so after this, don't even worry about it, you will have given me my answer, by running away from the ONLY question I have asked.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 1:01 pmYes, we've established you tried to move the goalposts. Thing is though, it doesn't matter - You want to examine trump's involvement in the collusion between his campaign and the russian interference campaign right? But you refuse to admit that collusion can possibly exist and claim it isn't relevant if it does. This makes you look very stupid, and that is something I enjoy.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:53 pmWhy can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:43 pmYou can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:38 pmJust go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:25 pmFirst I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:20 pm This also on page 2. See where I asked for trump collusion and you went somewhere else. You seemed to have gotten on your high horse too soon to prove how smart you are by attempting to prove something that wasn't asked for. So you can answer the question I asked( which you haven't) or you can do whatever the hell it is you're doing now. Have fun.
Why are you so terrified of admitting the campaign collusion?
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:59 pmI am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:24 pm Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
You're asking me to take you through the evidence and refusing to admit you can see the evidence. In order to recognise participation in collusion you will need to be able to recognise collusion actually occurred. I'm assuming you actually can recognise collusion occurred or you wouldn't be so terrified of answering.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:30 pmI never tried to move the goal post. I asked prove Trump. That's ALL I've asked. But you need me to admit things about shit I didn't ask for. I don't refuse to admit his campaign colluded on anything, I don't admit they did either, but that's NOT what I asked. Not once. No goal post moved. No different expectations other than that. Just that. Don't need to or not to admit to anything else. Just respond to the question I originally asked. Prove Trump. So if you can't do so after this, don't even worry about it, you will have given me my answer, by running away from the ONLY question I have asked.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 1:01 pmYes, we've established you tried to move the goalposts. Thing is though, it doesn't matter - You want to examine trump's involvement in the collusion between his campaign and the russian interference campaign right? But you refuse to admit that collusion can possibly exist and claim it isn't relevant if it does. This makes you look very stupid, and that is something I enjoy.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:53 pmWhy can't you admit that's not what I asked for? You can run away all you like or you can admit I didn't ask for that. If you are going to deny I asked for something different than what I asked, then why pretend you are capable of answering it at all.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:43 pmYou can run away whenever you like, or you could admit to being capable of recognising collusion occurred, then we can move on to trump's involvement in collusion you have admitted occurred. If you are going to deny meeting someone claiming to be from the russian government and wanting to help is colluding with their interference, then why pretend you are capable of considering collusion at all?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:38 pmJust go. I don't need to admit anything. Nothing is stopping you. Just go already. The only thing that's stopping you is you.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:25 pm First I am establishing there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian interference campaign, which is precisely what I said I would do from the start, then I will move on to Trump's personal involvement with established examples of collusion. If you can't admit the blatant proven campaign collusion why pretend you want to look at Trump's involvement in it? Face it, the fact that you are running away from the question 'does meeting someone from the russian government offering help from the russians in the campaign constitute collusion' is really the end of any pretence of a discussion here.
Why are you so terrified of admitting the campaign collusion?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:33 pmWhy do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:59 pmI am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:24 pm Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:25 pmSo you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:33 pmWhy do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:59 pmI am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:24 pm Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 pmOk. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:25 pmSo you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:33 pmWhy do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:59 pmI am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:24 pm Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
You've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:46 pmYou're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 pmOk. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:25 pmSo you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:33 pmWhy do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:59 pmI am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:24 pm Why don’t you just make your case, without spending countless pages explaining that you will make your case?
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Step 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:10 pmYou've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:46 pmYou're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 pmOk. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:25 pmSo you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:33 pmWhy do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:59 pm I am making my case, it starts with admitting that there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian interference campaign. If he can't acknowledge that there's no point saying anything else, it's like trying to teach calculus to someone who can't add 2 and 2.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Because I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:21 pmStep 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:10 pmYou've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:46 pmYou're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 pmOk. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:25 pmSo you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 3:33 pm Why do I have to admit it? Just go on with your explanation. I don't need to say anything for you to "prove" your point. Just go. No one is stopping you. All your digs that are totally unnecessary just make you look like a fucking moron. But please continue with your no answer.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
I'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:32 pmBecause I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:21 pmStep 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:10 pmYou've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:46 pmYou're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 pmOk. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:25 pm So you can't weasel out of it later. Not much point showing trump's participation in the trump tower debacle if you can't admit it was an example of collusion. Grow up.
- necronomous
- Official UJR Trolling Czar
- Posts: 7982
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:42 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
Ok so nothingAnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:35 pmI'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:32 pmBecause I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:21 pmStep 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:10 pmYou've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:46 pmYou're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:40 pm Ok. So you have no proof. Way to run away. Run along now.
- AnalHamster
- Doctor Chaser
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:46 pm
Re: Democrat/Socialist Movement-Have We Arrived?
I'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:51 pmOk so nothingAnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:35 pmI'll tell you his involvement with that particular example, then move on to some other examples, all you have to do is admit you can grasp the trump tower meeting constituted collusion. If you can't admit meeting a russian government representative to get help with the campaign constitutes collusion with the interference you aren't going to accept anything ever could be. Man up.necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:32 pmBecause I didn't ask about that. I asked how did trump collude. So for me, it just part of your argument that will lead to what he may or may not have done. So just continue. I'm listening.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:21 pmStep 1 is getting you to admit you can recognise the collusion that has occurred, then we will explore Trump's personal role in it. Why are you so scared of admitting the trump tower meeting was to collude?necronomous wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:10 pmYou've provided no proof Trump colluded that I could or could not admit to. Run along.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:46 pm You're incapable of looking at the proof, hence your inability to admit collusion happened at all.