Where all the MAGAt Trumpeteers and Lie-brul communists to post their wearisome screeds.
The board admins are not responsible for any items posted from Biker's FaceBook feed.
Anyone posting Ben Garrison political cartoons gets a three-day vacation.
Biker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 12, 2026 3:29 pm
1. Deny voter fraud happens
2. Admit that there is voter fraud but not on the scale that it impacts elections (We are here)
3. Acknowledge that there is widespead fraud
4. Say that Republicans do it too
Never said one or three. What republicans do is use the myth of widespread voter fraud to attempt widespread voter suppression.
You understand chump is lying about 2020, right?
Maybe, but no one who is reasonable can say that mail in ballots are 100% secure
Why not?
Because there is no way to ensure that the ballot was completed by the person it claims.
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
Signatures can be forged very easily.
Why do you not want to protect the sanctity of our elections? (I know the answer)
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
How much does your signature match between what it looks like in the tiny strip on the back of a credit card as opposed to scrawled over a large blank piece of paper? The signature on my driver licence barely matches much with what I write on a restaurant receipt.
And who's making the judgment on what's a match? Actual trained forensic document examiners, or "Joe the van driver, he can tell and stuff!"?
edit: fuck it, I ain't editing that.
If you can't be a good example, you can still serve as a horrible warning.
“All mushrooms are edible. Some even more than once!”
これを グーグル 翻訳に登録してくれておめでとう、バカ。
Biker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2026 2:22 pm
Signatures have to match how much more proof do you need
How much does your signature match between what it looks like in the tiny strip on the back of a credit card as opposed to scrawled over a large blank piece of paper? The signature on my driver licence barely matches much with what I write on a restaurant receipt.
And who's making the judgment on what's a match? Actual trained forensic document examiners, or "Joe the van driver, he can tell and stuff!"?
as much as I agree with your logic here, you are arguing with Who, not Biker.
Looking at the seven closest states, we find for instance that in Arizona, Heritage had to go back 25 years, over which there were 36 elections held and 42,626,379 ballots cast, in order to come up with 36 cases of fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome was altered by ballot fraud throughout that time period. In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. As the table indicates, this is the case with all the other states where the vote is likely to be close. There were a handful of reported cases of fraud amongst millions and millions of ballots cast, and none of them shifted the election outcome.
I don't expect the little bitch to acknowledge the facts on this subject this time around either. Cowardly disingenuous traitor doesn't have the stones for it.
Looking at the seven closest states, we find for instance that in Arizona, Heritage had to go back 25 years, over which there were 36 elections held and 42,626,379 ballots cast, in order to come up with 36 cases of fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome was altered by ballot fraud throughout that time period. In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. As the table indicates, this is the case with all the other states where the vote is likely to be close. There were a handful of reported cases of fraud amongst millions and millions of ballots cast, and none of them shifted the election outcome.
I don't expect the little bitch to acknowledge the facts on this subject this time around either. Cowardly disingenuous traitor doesn't have the stones for it.
Add 6600 now to the 39 case, fuckwit. Do you even read your own citations?
Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2026 5:15 pm
Add 6600 now to the 39 case, fuckwit. Do you even read your own citations?
State did their constitutional job and caught the error, no need for fascist federal government under your boy's direction to take over elections to purge citizens from voting like they do from living. Wanna address the fact that even Heritage cites a miniscule amount of voter fraud happening, or is this another disingenuous talking point from the little bitch?
Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2026 6:20 pm
Cool, but it happened, at its more than the 39 that the neocons reported
dot wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2026 6:16 pm
no need for fascist federal government under your boy's direction to take over elections to purge citizens from voting like they do from living. Wanna address the fact that even Heritage cites a miniscule amount of voter fraud happening, or is this another disingenuous talking point from the little bitch?
Still not gonna address facts, especially when a lot of that caught voter fraud was your side committing it? No? Got it, still a little bitch that you are.
Biker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2026 6:20 pm
Cool, but it happened, at its more than the 39 that the neocons reported
dot wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2026 6:16 pm
no need for fascist federal government under your boy's direction to take over elections to purge citizens from voting like they do from living. Wanna address the fact that even Heritage cites a miniscule amount of voter fraud happening, or is this another disingenuous talking point from the little bitch?
Still not gonna address facts, especially when a lot of that caught voter fraud was your side committing it? No? Got it, still a little bitch that you are.
You stated an opinion, not a face, ese. And its not miniscule, as we have seen. Article after article after article
Tell us, are you like Who and think the HB laptop isnt real either?
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2026 5:33 pm
Where are you reading 6600?
The governor admitted that 6600 illegals were registered to vote. Thats fraud
Ah , you are ignoring the article and referring to the error made by the government in new Jersey, that was then caught and corrected.
How many of them voted again?
We dont know how many voted. Maybe all, maybe none, maybe 25%, 50%? No clue, but voter fraud is voter fraud and to suggest it doesnt happen or only happens on a small scale is completely wrong and dishonest. But again, youre all about being disingenuous
AnalHamster wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2026 5:33 pm
Where are you reading 6600?
The governor admitted that 6600 illegals were registered to vote. Thats fraud
Ah , you are ignoring the article and referring to the error made by the government in new Jersey, that was then caught and corrected.
How many of them voted again?
We dont know how many voted. Maybe all, maybe none, maybe 25%, 50%? No clue, but voter fraud is voter fraud and to suggest it doesnt happen or only happens on a small scale is completely wrong and dishonest. But again, youre all about being disingenuous
Having the government accidentally register someone is voter fraud?
The answer was around 400, due to government error not the fault of the people who voted. What election in new Jersey was swayed by 400 votes again?
Yes there is voter fraud, the point is on a minuscule scale. Chumpy has put the full weight of government into trying to find evidence and failed, because there isn't any. Chump just wants to defend his fragile ego over listing 2020 and suppress legal votes to try to steal the next election. Naturally you support him because however much you say you don't support the Iran war you'll vote to continue it. Spineless republicans are what is letting him get away with this shit.
