UJ's Hamster Died. We're All That's Left...
https://ujrefugees.net/
Keep up.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:04 pmSweet. So you're read it? Quit stalling and fill us in!VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:48 pmwho would of thunkVisionaryEric wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:09 pm Barr is going to cock up his report, regardless of the conclusion.
With what? That the Dims are upset? Shocker!VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:09 pmKeep up.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:04 pmSweet. So you're read it? Quit stalling and fill us in!VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:48 pmwho would of thunkVisionaryEric wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:09 pm Barr is going to cock up his report, regardless of the conclusion.
Is not a surprise to anyone that you don't have the mental capability do process news from other sources than Breitbart and Fox. The absolute worst of the sheeple fake news.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:58 amWith what? That the Dims are upset? Shocker!VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:09 pmKeep up.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:04 pmSweet. So you're read it? Quit stalling and fill us in!VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:48 pmwho would of thunkVisionaryEric wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:09 pm Barr is going to cock up his report, regardless of the conclusion.
That the New York Times and WaPo have "Anonymous Sources" that say the report is damaging? Shocker! Hopefully these sources are better than the sources that fed them a bunch of wrong info the past 2 years that they later had to grudgingly correct.
That the DOJ is working on it now to release in full what they legally can?
That you havent seen it?
What exactly am I not up to speed on?
So you don't know shit. When pressed you provide nothing. No details; only what you've been told. It's clear you're simply full of bluster and shit. Ill ask for the 3rd time: What exact evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? Be specific you pussy.VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:31 pmThat Barr fucked up his summary.
Do I need to close caption this for you?
If you're not aware already, it doesn't help if I shove it down your throat either. You're always going to be a sheep.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 7:38 pmSo you don't know shit. When pressed you provide nothing. No details; only what you've been told. It's clear you're simply full of bluster and shit. Ill ask for the 3rd time: What exact evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? Be specific you pussy.VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:31 pmThat Barr fucked up his summary.
Do I need to close caption this for you?
"Anonymous sources say" whatever they want to. The AG is now reviewing the doc page by page - with Mueller or some of his staff - to determine what can be released. This is what he said he was going to do in his so-called summary. So what everyone is worked up about, I have no idea?VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:15 pmIf you're not aware already, it doesn't help if I shove it down your throat either. You're always going to be a sheep.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 7:38 pmSo you don't know shit. When pressed you provide nothing. No details; only what you've been told. It's clear you're simply full of bluster and shit. Ill ask for the 3rd time: What exact evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? Be specific you pussy.VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:31 pmThat Barr fucked up his summary.
Do I need to close caption this for you?
Of course you have no idea. That's the point.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:23 pm"Anonymous sources say" whatever they want to. The AG is now reviewing the doc page by page - with Mueller or some of his staff - to determine what can be released. This is what he said he was going to do in his so-called summary. So what everyone is worked up about, I have no idea?VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:15 pmIf you're not aware already, it doesn't help if I shove it down your throat either. You're always going to be a sheep.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 7:38 pmSo you don't know shit. When pressed you provide nothing. No details; only what you've been told. It's clear you're simply full of bluster and shit. Ill ask for the 3rd time: What exact evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? Be specific you pussy.VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:31 pmThat Barr fucked up his summary.
Do I need to close caption this for you?
Hey oh great intelligently superior one... it's intellectually superior.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:09 amSorry, don't don't the vernacular of this younger generation. By "punk" if you mean intelligently superior, then yes. Like me Newton over you Neanderthal.megman wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 11:41 pmYou act like a punk. Must be true...WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 11:18 pmDoes your pea brain really believe I'm 27 years old? I heard it on the internet, Must be true. Jeez. Watch more, post less.Highlander wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 7:14 pmHow dare you question the 27 year old superior intelligence.AnalHamster wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 4:45 pmYou're pretending you can't see the question because you can't answer it. If you had half a brain that would make you question your position.WestTexasCrude wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2019 3:12 am And now we see the British Wood Thrush in it's natural habitat. Skittish to the point of invisibility. Confronted with AH's continuing BS, just wants to go extinct. Knows you can't fix stupid.
Thanks again for proving you're a pussy. I can keep asking and you can keep making yourself look foolish. I know you think you are looking big and bad but you are not fooling anyone. You are being exposed yet again (how many times now?) for what you truly are: A giant pussy. I'll ask again for the 4th time: what specific evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? This should be pretty easy, right? Answer the question you giant fucking pussy. It should tell you something about your position that you can't defend it. Pussy.VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:15 pmIf you're not aware already, it doesn't help if I shove it down your throat either. You're always going to be a sheep.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 7:38 pmSo you don't know shit. When pressed you provide nothing. No details; only what you've been told. It's clear you're simply full of bluster and shit. Ill ask for the 3rd time: What exact evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? Be specific you pussy.VisionaryEric wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:31 pmThat Barr fucked up his summary.
Do I need to close caption this for you?
if i could intervene here a second. it seems the two of you are getting upset with each other. so far, the only thing the AG has released is that there will be no further indictments and there was no collusion between trump and the russians during the election. anything else that he is going to put into the redacted version of the mueller report is unknown to anyone at this time. its only speculation that he will either (a) remove names that are unimportant to the reports findings, or (b) that he will cut and paste it into an edited version that hides activity by trump that yield bread crumbs to further investigations that might lead to impeachment. Thanks. I love yall.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:59 pm Thanks again for proving you're a pussy. I can keep asking and you can keep making yourself look foolish. I know you think you are looking big and bad but you are not fooling anyone. You are being exposed yet again (how many times now?) for what you truly are: A giant pussy. I'll ask again for the 4th time: what specific evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? This should be pretty easy, right? Answer the question you giant fucking pussy. It should tell you something about your position that you can't defend it. Pussy.
Exactly, but hes too much of a pussy to admit that none of those = "fucked up the summary".Flumper wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:05 pmif i could intervene here a second. it seems the two of you are getting upset with each other. so far, the only thing the AG has released is that there will be no further indictments and there was no collusion between trump and the russians during the election. anything else that he is going to put into the redacted version of the mueller report is unknown to anyone at this time. its only speculation that he will either (a) remove names that are unimportant to the reports findings, or (b) that he will cut and paste it into an edited version that hides activity by trump that yield bread crumbs to further investigations that might lead to impeachment. Thanks. I love yall.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:59 pm Thanks again for proving you're a pussy. I can keep asking and you can keep making yourself look foolish. I know you think you are looking big and bad but you are not fooling anyone. You are being exposed yet again (how many times now?) for what you truly are: A giant pussy. I'll ask again for the 4th time: what specific evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? This should be pretty easy, right? Answer the question you giant fucking pussy. It should tell you something about your position that you can't defend it. Pussy.
Nope, it states that there was no collusion between trump and the Russian Government.Flumper wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:05 pmif i could intervene here a second. it seems the two of you are getting upset with each other. so far, the only thing the AG has released is that there will be no further indictments and there was no collusion between trump and the russians during the election. anything else that he is going to put into the redacted version of the mueller report is unknown to anyone at this time. its only speculation that he will either (a) remove names that are unimportant to the reports findings, or (b) that he will cut and paste it into an edited version that hides activity by trump that yield bread crumbs to further investigations that might lead to impeachment. Thanks. I love yall.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:59 pm Thanks again for proving you're a pussy. I can keep asking and you can keep making yourself look foolish. I know you think you are looking big and bad but you are not fooling anyone. You are being exposed yet again (how many times now?) for what you truly are: A giant pussy. I'll ask again for the 4th time: what specific evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? This should be pretty easy, right? Answer the question you giant fucking pussy. It should tell you something about your position that you can't defend it. Pussy.
Still no charges. So...CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:10 pmNope, it states that there was no collusion between trump and the Russian Government.Flumper wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:05 pmif i could intervene here a second. it seems the two of you are getting upset with each other. so far, the only thing the AG has released is that there will be no further indictments and there was no collusion between trump and the russians during the election. anything else that he is going to put into the redacted version of the mueller report is unknown to anyone at this time. its only speculation that he will either (a) remove names that are unimportant to the reports findings, or (b) that he will cut and paste it into an edited version that hides activity by trump that yield bread crumbs to further investigations that might lead to impeachment. Thanks. I love yall.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:59 pm Thanks again for proving you're a pussy. I can keep asking and you can keep making yourself look foolish. I know you think you are looking big and bad but you are not fooling anyone. You are being exposed yet again (how many times now?) for what you truly are: A giant pussy. I'll ask again for the 4th time: what specific evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? This should be pretty easy, right? Answer the question you giant fucking pussy. It should tell you something about your position that you can't defend it. Pussy.
Nixon was never chargedVinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 11:09 pmStill no charges. So...CaptQuint wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:10 pmNope, it states that there was no collusion between trump and the Russian Government.Flumper wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:05 pmif i could intervene here a second. it seems the two of you are getting upset with each other. so far, the only thing the AG has released is that there will be no further indictments and there was no collusion between trump and the russians during the election. anything else that he is going to put into the redacted version of the mueller report is unknown to anyone at this time. its only speculation that he will either (a) remove names that are unimportant to the reports findings, or (b) that he will cut and paste it into an edited version that hides activity by trump that yield bread crumbs to further investigations that might lead to impeachment. Thanks. I love yall.CHEEZY17 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:59 pm Thanks again for proving you're a pussy. I can keep asking and you can keep making yourself look foolish. I know you think you are looking big and bad but you are not fooling anyone. You are being exposed yet again (how many times now?) for what you truly are: A giant pussy. I'll ask again for the 4th time: what specific evidence do you have that he "fucked up the summary"? This should be pretty easy, right? Answer the question you giant fucking pussy. It should tell you something about your position that you can't defend it. Pussy.
yeah, well i think that was pretty much assumed by everyone at that point.
I promise you, when Trump is out of office, the Democrats will lose interest. Why? Because this is all politics. They know now - those who didn't already - that he never colluded with the Russians. But it serves their purpose to get the plebs worked up about it. However, they are having some debate as to whether this is a good strategy, or if it will backfire.
Are you serious? Just finding a member of his campaign that wasn't meeting Russians is nearly impossible. Barr's summary said they did not establish that Trump's campaign conspired with The Russian Government.VinceBordenIII wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2019 3:47 pmI promise you, when Trump is out of office, the Democrats will lose interest. Why? Because this is all politics. They know now - those who didn't already - that he never colluded with the Russians. But it serves their purpose to get the plebs worked up about it. However, they are having some debate as to whether this is a good strategy, or if it will backfire.